Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 27 May 2012 16:49:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4FC2A153.78AA@mindspring.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Sun, 27 May 2012 17:49:07 -0400 |
| From | pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-To | pfiland@mindspring.com |
| Organization | PF |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Open letter to Ian Collins |
| References | <jprl29$ifd$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a2dkjvF7faU2@mid.individual.net> <jpsl62$h39$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a2e8hgF7faU3@mid.individual.net> <jpsr5k$utq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <a2ea1oF7faU4@mid.individual.net> <lny5odisrc.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <4FC26A8F.5DEB@mindspring.com> <jpu2h5$16r$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jpu57n$72n$1@dont-email.me> <lntxz1ia1w.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 48 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 4.156.228.157 |
| X-Trace | sv3-KWvc9eqMcv4np+KaU1r1lroNN6ajyKCo4AyvDaMkpzirngBEYSkanC/1qFsFSNlDPVQJ8RL9Y078mNB!YHoKnLo65AkrH0EQJ8LAcOeVrpmkdBHXJH6zc7OCkTeKKHJMj/7lOEHZdHlL7kviBo5pE/xG8r6m!6FwX5RkTcx4= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2782 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:21437 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Keith Thompson wrote: > > "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > > "jacob navia" <jacob@spamsink.net> wrote in message > > news:jpu2h5$16r$1@speranza.aioe.org... > >> Le 27/05/12 19:55, pete a écrit : > >>> I think there's about a zillion combinations of (a) and (b), > >>> where (a - b) has problems. > >> > >> Sure. > >> > >> You want to say then that it is not a good idea in C to write > >> > >> a - b > >> > >> ?? > >> > >> If you think that overflow could be a problem in a comparison you can > >> write something more complicated, expressions can be of any length, it > >> is only important that they be consequent. > > > > Maybe he means there might be more problems using: > > > > (a-b<=0) > > > > than just using: > > > > (a<=b) > > > > for example. Especially when a and b are unsigned. (Assuming the way > > comparisons will be done is along the lines of that former expression.) > > My point is simply that "a - b" is not a reliable way to *compare* > two arbitrary integer values. Using a wider type is not a general > solution. > > If you *don't* think that overflow could be a problem in a > comparison, then you've probably missed something. > > The language doesn't have a built-in 3-way comparison operator, > but it does have < and >. Just use them. My prefered 3-way, to compare 2 integers, is #define COMPAR(A, B) (B > A ? -1 : B != A) -- pete
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 00:22 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-05-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 01:13 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-26 16:53 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-05-26 16:41 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-26 22:43 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-05-26 15:41 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 01:14 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins MelissA <melis@a.com> - 2012-05-27 00:52 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-05-26 20:40 -0500
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 09:32 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 07:18 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 14:24 +1200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-27 10:36 +0100
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 22:33 +1200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-27 12:25 +0100
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-28 07:17 +1200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-05-27 13:03 +0000
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 15:16 +1200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 09:30 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 20:56 +1200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 11:12 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-27 21:22 +1200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 07:15 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-27 07:49 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 13:55 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 22:24 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-27 22:09 +0100
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-05-27 14:33 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 17:49 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 17:31 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Philip Lantz <prl@canterey.us> - 2012-05-28 01:38 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-27 15:46 +0100
Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-13 21:25 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-13 21:52 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-14 04:00 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-06-14 00:04 -0400
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-27 09:42 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-28 12:39 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-28 21:44 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-05-29 09:46 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-29 10:06 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-29 10:37 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-29 10:58 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@schmitz-digital.de> - 2012-05-29 11:34 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-05-29 03:02 -0700
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-29 09:59 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-05-29 20:09 +0200
Re: Open letter to Ian Collins "Sarah Wren" <swreb@ameritech.net> - 2012-05-29 01:40 -0600
csiph-web