Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4FC27072.638B@mindspring.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Sun, 27 May 2012 14:20:34 -0400 |
| From | pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-To | pfiland@mindspring.com |
| Organization | PF |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. |
| References | <d8247fad-17c7-4105-82c1-364f00dac222@p27g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <jptq6q$27g$1@dont-email.me> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 27 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 4.154.221.107 |
| X-Trace | sv3-KulJgwrIyJWLUgv5m82tUyeLNVFmoUAV5rVA+oTSy0hW681ZIdD9Iy7gfnxTQeWzIK1JcQpGvw2K5GK!3bZ9PuSWPi5P9e5b5T4HNC/C72wprP60c1CZdxEvVpLxh/EMYjwQrYEyKG2AaToLgOwb61ziUn+o!teQFJ3zDfBE= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1908 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:21420 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Eric Sosman wrote: > > On 5/27/2012 1:30 PM, John Reye wrote: > > Hi! > > > > In writing code I often find numerous ways of expressing the same > > thing. > > I have some questions of "style" and "optimization" that I'd like to > > ask. > > [...] > > (*) - what do you think? > > I think this is Question 20.14 on the comp.lang.c Frequently > Asked Questions (FAQ) page, <http://www.c-faq.com/>. I think John Reye's question was more about whether to use a const qualified variable (pst) in a function to hold the sum of two variables (st + i), when the sum was going to be used frequently and the values of the two variables were not going to change within the function. I would be inclined to use a const qualified variable in such a case. -- pete
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-27 10:30 -0700
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. John Reye <jononanon@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-27 10:35 -0700
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 14:11 -0400
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-27 14:01 -0400
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-05-27 14:20 -0400
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-05-27 22:03 +0200
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2012-05-28 14:54 +0200
Re: Array addressing styles: arr[i].d[j] versus pArr->d[j], etc. Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-31 13:09 -0700
csiph-web