Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <4FB34489.5020306@loria.fr> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-05-16 08:09 +0200 |
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Remving an element from Queue |
| References | (7 earlier) <lr13r7lq6ilf70ldvrp5c6om9suc9345i7@4ax.com> <m7va89-ctp.ln1@jones.homeip.net> <0sm5r7t5pafpft5me4f5hiadmjghhhdfdr@4ax.com> <jov5ec$rul$1@dont-email.me> <lu76r7pm9u9u3gf7cds29lu3uaolvfcaqs@4ax.com> |
| Organization | Guest of ProXad - France |
Am 16.05.2012 05:38, schrieb Barry Schwarz: > That is not what the standard says - "The calloc function allocates > space for an array of nmemb objects, each of whose size is size. The > space is initialized to all bits zero." Note the additional > requirement that the entire allocated space be considered a single > array. size_t must be able to hold the size in bytes of the largest > possible object, including aggregates such as arrays. When a*b is > mathematically larger then SIZE_MAX, a "successful" call to calloc > would violate this requirement. Therefore, calloc should be required > to return NULL in this case, which is what I said in the part you > snipped. I can't find any text in the standard about size_t that requires this. The only requirement is that the type must be able to hold the value of the sizeof operator. This restricts the possible size only for objects to which that operator applies, in particular it constrains the possible size of VLA (as a function of the size of the base type). But since objects allocated by the "alloc" family of functions are not subject to the sizeof operator, this restriction doesn't seem to apply. To me, the only implicit bound for calloc seems to be (SIZE_MAX + 1)*(SIZE_MAX + 1)-1 Jens
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Remving an element from Queue arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2012-05-08 08:09 +0000
Re: Remving an element from Queue Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-08 08:01 -0400
Re: Remving an element from Queue arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2012-05-09 05:43 +0000
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-08 23:21 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2012-05-09 09:27 +0000
Re: Remving an element from Queue James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-09 07:54 -0400
Re: Remving an element from Queue arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2012-05-09 13:18 +0000
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-09 10:59 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue arnuld <arnuld.mizong@gmail.com> - 2012-05-10 05:26 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-11 00:11 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-14 15:53 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-05-15 17:42 -0400
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-15 23:03 -0400
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-15 20:38 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-05-16 08:09 +0200
Re: Remving an element from Queue James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-16 07:18 -0400
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-16 16:30 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-17 09:09 -0400
Re: Remving an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-17 11:48 -0700
Re: Removing an element from Queue James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-17 15:38 -0400
Re: Removing an element from Queue Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-17 15:21 -0700
Re: Removing an element from Queue James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-17 19:08 -0400
Re: Removing an element from Queue Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-19 09:05 -0700
Re: Removing an element from Queue lawrence.jones@siemens.com - 2012-05-20 15:10 -0400
Re: Removing an element from Queue Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-21 09:00 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-19 08:49 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-05-17 12:36 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-08 05:09 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-08 14:03 +0100
Re: Remving an element from Queue nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-09 00:01 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-09 00:03 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-09 10:37 +0100
Re: Remving an element from Queue nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-09 03:05 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2012-05-09 09:44 +0000
Re: Remving an element from Queue Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-08 06:07 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue Mark Bluemel <mark.bluemel@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-08 06:35 -0700
Re: Remving an element from Queue Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2012-05-08 20:50 +0200
Re: Remving an element from Queue 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-11 00:39 -0700
csiph-web