Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Redundant return() |
| Date | 2012-05-15 18:39 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4FB2DB30.30109@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <27375124.1151.1337067212163.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbip22> <return-20120515095002@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <jotj8p$2j5$1@dont-email.me> <joujll$pv1$1@dont-email.me> <a1g3dgFd96U7@mid.individual.net> |
On 05/15/2012 06:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 05/16/12 09:58 AM, BartC wrote:
>> "James Kuyper"<jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:jotj8p$2j5$1@dont-email.me...
...
>>> The relevant issue isn't speed, but ease of comprehension. Supporters of
>>> "single exit" claim it's easier to comprehend; my personal experience is
>>> that early-return is easier.
>>
>> Yes. Easier in that there is then a choice.
>>
>> I can't see the problem with multiple returns. No matter how many returns
>> there are in one function, the next statement executed will always be the
>> one falling the original call. That's not much different from 'single exit'.
>
> Clean-up is always the elephant in the room with multiple returns in C.
> Hence the proliferation of goto spaghetti. I for one prefer early
> return on precondition tests, but once a function allocates a resource
> or changes a state, there should only be one.
I'm in perfect agreement here. If I allocate memory, I normally use the
following structure where possible (there's obviously situations in
which it's NOT possible):
retval = SUCCESS;
p = malloc(count * sizeof *p);
if (p == NULL)
{
// error handling
return ERROR1;
}
else
{
// Normal processing. 'return' prohibited in this block.
if(error condition)
{
// other error handling
retval = ERROR2;
}
free(p);
}
return retval;
I handle fopen() and fclose() similarly, and any other similar book-end
functions (the libraries I use have quite a few book-end pairs).
This approach doesn't scale well when many different resources need to
be managed simultaneously, in which case more complicated approaches are
needed.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Redundant return() pembed2012 <once@was.enough.invalid> - 2012-05-12 21:41 +0000
Re: Redundant return() pembed2012 <once@was.enough.invalid> - 2012-05-12 21:56 +0000
Re: Redundant return() Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-05-12 17:07 -0600
Re: Redundant return() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-12 18:46 -0400
Re: Redundant return() Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-12 20:10 -0400
Re: Redundant return() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-12 21:29 -0400
Re: Redundant return() Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-05-12 15:49 -0700
Re: Redundant return() pembed2012 <once@was.enough.invalid> - 2012-05-14 16:40 +0000
Re: Redundant return() Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-05-14 17:57 +0100
Re: Redundant return() nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-15 00:33 -0700
Re: Redundant return() nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-15 03:03 -0700
Re: Redundant return() nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-15 03:26 -0700
Re: Redundant return() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-15 08:51 -0400
Re: Redundant return() "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-15 12:20 +0100
Re: Redundant return() Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-16 07:59 +1200
Re: Redundant return() Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-05-15 20:08 +0000
Re: Redundant return() Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-16 08:18 +1200
Re: Redundant return() Lanarcam <lanarcam1@yahoo.fr> - 2012-05-15 22:48 +0200
Re: Redundant return() Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-16 09:56 +1200
Re: Redundant return() "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-15 22:59 +0100
Re: Redundant return() Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-16 10:16 +1200
Re: Redundant return() "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-16 09:29 +0100
Re: Redundant return() Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-05-15 07:51 -0400
Re: Redundant return() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-15 08:47 -0400
Re: Redundant return() Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-16 08:01 +1200
Re: Redundant return() "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-05-15 22:58 +0100
Re: Redundant return() Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-05-16 10:24 +1200
Re: Redundant return() James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-05-15 18:39 -0400
Re: Redundant return() nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com - 2012-05-16 02:45 -0700
Re: Redundant return() Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-05-16 13:34 +0200
csiph-web