Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:49:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4F727C20.5A49@mindspring.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:49:04 -0500 |
| From | pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-To | pfiland@mindspring.com |
| Organization | PF |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Odd benchmark behavior |
| References | <9talg3F84gU1@mid.individual.net> <4f70351c$0$1385$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <4f703bfa$0$1386$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <4f71688a$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> <4f716921$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 19 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 4.154.223.207 |
| X-Trace | sv3-wuaOO+ZocdzsIGuramTo7aHX7mouP3NVoZxBiWeg615HBO8UV73hp0fbo5OsDjRR/TdPiVQV+Zsbv6s!lRQqJ1EpzNc/rJuFAvzZRiCY9qYT52TH+t9pYSuKuC2aWeCpfa8/W4bgvlf2awl2JqxRnWA0UwSg!7JtiOlYtPi8= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1606 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1747 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:19092 |
Show key headers only | View raw
io_x wrote:
>
> "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:4f71688a$0$1383$4fafbaef@reader2.news.tin.it...
>
> there is someone that know if (unsigned) sqrt(9.0) can be
> follow the C standard the unsigned 2???
> Thank you
You could do it this way instead:
la:
v = p;
for (i = ((1 == v) + v) / 2; v > i; i = (p / v + v) / 2) {
v = i;
}
--
pete
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Odd benchmark behavior Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2012-03-26 07:51 +0000
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-03-26 11:26 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-03-26 10:40 +0100
Re: Odd benchmark behavior gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 03:37 -0700
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-03-26 14:13 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-03-26 11:55 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-03-27 09:17 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-03-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "Scott Fluhrer" <sfluhrer@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-03-27 13:39 -0400
Re: Odd benchmark behavior pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-03-27 21:49 -0500
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-04-05 12:18 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-04-05 06:48 -0400
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-04-05 14:12 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-04-05 09:03 -0400
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-04-05 16:18 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-04-07 13:26 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-04-06 09:31 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-03-27 19:01 +0200
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-03-26 10:36 +0100
Re: Odd benchmark behavior Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2012-03-26 10:02 +0000
Re: Odd benchmark behavior Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-03-26 22:58 +1300
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-03-26 15:16 +0100
Re: Odd benchmark behavior Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2012-03-27 06:20 +0000
Re: Odd benchmark behavior "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-03-27 10:13 +0100
Re: Odd benchmark behavior Nils M Holm <news2009@t3x.org> - 2012-03-27 11:59 +0000
csiph-web