Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? |
| Date | 2012-03-27 15:32 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4F7215D1.3080208@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <4f71cf85$0$21948$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <0.64ccc68ce1fe7a16cc7d.20120327172357BST.878vimnhb6.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0.5a4e1aeae0758d15ba6c.20120327201205BST.87398too3e.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
On 03/27/2012 03:12 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: > >> Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> writes: > <snip> >>> As an aside of the aside, I do not understand the third option in >>> the constraint, and it has been removed in N1570. >> >> It makes sense to remove it. > > No it didn't! This part of my reply was nonsense. It's perfectly > possible to well-define relative comparisons between pointers to > incomplete types. > > It's good to see that the change is just due to a change in terminology. Could you explain the change in terminology? I thought about the possibility that something like that was involved, but I didn't notice anything relevant.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 16:32 +0200
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Harald van Dijk <haraldvdijk@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 09:09 -0700
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-27 12:15 -0400
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 18:54 +0200
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-03-27 17:23 +0100
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-03-27 20:12 +0100
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-27 15:32 -0400
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Harald van Dijk <haraldvdijk@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-27 16:11 -0400
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-27 10:32 -0700
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 15:08 +0200
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2012-03-28 09:07 +0200
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 16:15 +0200
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-03-28 14:26 +0000
Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Peter Nilsson <airia@acay.com.au> - 2012-03-27 23:22 -0700
csiph-web