Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #19089

Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold?

From James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold?
Date 2012-03-27 15:32 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <4F7215D1.3080208@verizon.net> (permalink)
References <4f71cf85$0$21948$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <0.64ccc68ce1fe7a16cc7d.20120327172357BST.878vimnhb6.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0.5a4e1aeae0758d15ba6c.20120327201205BST.87398too3e.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/27/2012 03:12 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes:
> 
>> Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> writes:
> <snip>
>>> As an aside of the aside, I do not understand the third option in
>>> the constraint, and it has been removed in N1570.
>>
>> It makes sense to remove it.
> 
> No it didn't!  This part of my reply was nonsense.  It's perfectly
> possible to well-define relative comparisons between pointers to
> incomplete types.
> 
> It's good to see that the change is just due to a change in terminology.

Could you explain the change in terminology? I thought about the
possibility that something like that was involved, but I didn't notice
anything relevant.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 16:32 +0200
  Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Harald van Dijk <haraldvdijk@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 09:09 -0700
  Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-27 12:15 -0400
    Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 18:54 +0200
  Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-03-27 17:23 +0100
    Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-03-27 20:12 +0100
      Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-27 15:32 -0400
        Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Harald van Dijk <haraldvdijk@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 12:47 -0700
          Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-27 16:11 -0400
  Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-27 10:32 -0700
    Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 15:08 +0200
  Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2012-03-28 09:07 +0200
    Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Francois Grieu <fgrieu@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 16:15 +0200
      Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-03-28 14:26 +0000
  Re: does 0<(unsigned short)0x8000 hold? Peter Nilsson <airia@acay.com.au> - 2012-03-27 23:22 -0700

csiph-web