Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <4EF4F8A2.3070506@loria.fr> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-12-23 22:54 +0100 |
| From | Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: New C standard (was Re: warning: string length greater than '509') |
| References | <jd1jij$m7g$1@reader1.panix.com> <qmn8f7hfvorini9ba4qdjld0h3p6tkag99@4ax.com> <jd1stq$nhj$1@reader1.panix.com> <a3h9f7ds78m1vuaj2o732l2s5u9klus0fr@4ax.com> <lny5u311l0.fsf_-_@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| Organization | Guest of ProXad - France |
Am 12/23/2011 09:21 PM, schrieb Keith Thompson:
> I presume that no implementations yet support all of C2011. Are there
> implementations that support some of the new C2011 features?
gcc 4.6 has some, nothing dramatic, but AFAIR there are:
- _Static_assert
- redefinitions of typedefs
- anonymous struct or unions are supported since long.
- Some features such as _Noreturn or _Allignas could probably just
be implemented as macros to some __attribute__
my guess would be that on POSIX systems the implementation of the
library side of threads and atomics could be realized quickly.
Jens
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
warning: string length greater than '509' JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-12-23 10:01 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-12-23 11:19 +0100
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-12-23 05:49 -0500
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-12-23 13:52 +0100
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-28 03:27 -0800
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-12-28 08:16 -0500
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-12-28 13:04 -0800
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-25 16:47 -0800
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-12-23 13:04 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-12-23 09:36 -0500
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-23 04:59 -0600
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-12-23 12:41 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-12-23 13:50 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-12-23 09:14 -0500
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-23 12:27 -0600
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-12-23 19:04 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-23 16:11 -0600
New C standard (was Re: warning: string length greater than '509') Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-12-23 12:21 -0800
Re: New C standard (was Re: warning: string length greater than '509') Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2011-12-23 22:54 +0100
Re: New C standard (was Re: warning: string length greater than '509') Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-23 16:27 -0600
Re: New C standard (was Re: warning: string length greater than '509') rudolf <r.thered@gmail.com> - 2011-12-23 15:36 -0800
new edition of Harbison and Steele? Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2011-12-26 18:57 -0800
Re: new edition of Harbison and Steele? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-12-27 02:48 -0800
Re: new edition of Harbison and Steele? Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2011-12-27 11:45 -0800
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-12-24 05:42 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-24 00:47 -0600
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2011-12-24 08:51 +0000
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Stars and Midnight China Blue <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-23 03:34 -0800
Re: warning: string length greater than '509' Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-23 16:48 +0000
csiph-web