Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: evaluate a generic swap function |
| Date | 2011-09-23 16:43 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4E7CEF78.8020502@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <11027611.3262.1316798819548.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqjc18> <0.cd4cbe9b01c698079f35.20110923183607BST.87y5xfw48o.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <2208063.1130.1316800191576.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqih9> <0.b6bffa64cc312244356e.20110923201821BST.87hb43vzib.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <2158111.1838.1316807699210.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqjw35> |
On 09/23/2011 03:54 PM, Nelu wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 3:18:20 PM UTC-4, Ben Bacarisse wrote: ... >> It is a rare program that has to worry about the allocation of an >> automatic array. The CPU cost is often zero. Since a swap that uses an >> auto buffer is entirely portable and is likely as efficient as one that >> uses non-portable thread local storage or possibly problematic static >> storage, it's the way I'd go every time. > > That makes sense. In the DOS days the stack size was a limiting factor, I think. Is the size of the automatic array subject to implementation or are there minimal requirements imposed by the standard? The C standard never even mentions the stack, and can be implemented on machines without a hardware stack. Even on platforms where there is a stack, the C standard imposes no requirements from which you can infer a minimum size for that stack.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
evaluate a generic swap function Stanley Rice <heconghui@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 06:51 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-20 16:01 +0200
Re: evaluate a generic swap function jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-09-20 14:29 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-20 21:13 +0200
Re: evaluate a generic swap function jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-09-20 20:30 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-20 17:05 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-09-21 15:45 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-09-21 09:33 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-21 19:17 +0200
Re: evaluate a generic swap function gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-09-21 17:34 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Jack Foot <foot@dev.null.invalid> - 2011-09-21 18:12 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-09-20 07:33 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function ImpalerCore <jadill33@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 08:26 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-20 23:10 -0400
Re: evaluate a generic swap function "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-20 22:20 +0100
Re: evaluate a generic swap function jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-20 23:23 +0200
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-20 23:07 +0100
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-09-20 21:15 -0400
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-09-21 03:17 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 02:40 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-09-23 01:46 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 10:26 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-23 18:36 +0100
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 10:49 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-23 20:18 +0100
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 12:54 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-09-23 16:43 -0400
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 13:49 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-09-23 17:44 -0400
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 18:04 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-24 13:52 -0800
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-23 21:46 +0100
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 13:59 -0700
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-09-26 22:59 +0000
Re: evaluate a generic swap function pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-23 18:19 -0400
Re: evaluate a generic swap function Nelu <tandauioan@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 16:36 -0700
csiph-web