Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #10355

Re: datatype for bit flags

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:00:25 -0500
Message-ID <4E73C6FB.617C@mindspring.com> (permalink)
Date Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:00:27 -0400
From pete <pfiland@mindspring.com>
Reply-To pfiland@mindspring.com
Organization PF
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: datatype for bit flags
References <j4s877$2a0$1@dont-email.me> <87k4994fkd.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> <930e767b-26f0-4123-836d-64dac1f47cfb@d2g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <slrnj77ddt.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Lines 9
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 4.156.228.129
X-Trace sv3-3SHjo/VBWjQD4d71Dw4WnK504NLotZg7tlCnZDeNIKlqLtANvHcCLoHgavoNLbRoznGWXu9UIg4eS8Z!HaBfkX3vFzYNAuke5hlp8W1wjRo5C7CX27TD2AYvF3BUK04HSgqV+aQgWa+2wPq2ARYr0WOfnCrf!rpTtKZw0g8U=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1370
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:10355 comp.lang.c++:10204

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Jorgen Grahn wrote:
 
> In this case the problem didn't call for signedness, so I'd use
> 'unsigned'.

(unsigned) would also be my default choice for bitwise operations.

-- 
pete

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

datatype for bit flags Gr <g@g.com> - 2011-09-15 12:37 +0530
  Re: datatype for bit flags jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-15 09:26 +0200
    Re: datatype for bit flags Gr <g@g.com> - 2011-09-15 13:33 +0530
      Re: datatype for bit flags jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-15 10:12 +0200
  Re: datatype for bit flags Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-09-15 01:06 -0700
  Re: datatype for bit flags "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-15 10:56 +0100
    Re: datatype for bit flags Gr <g@g.com> - 2011-09-15 17:24 +0530
  Re: datatype for bit flags Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-09-16 01:16 +0300
    Re: datatype for bit flags Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-09-16 04:59 -0700
      Re: datatype for bit flags Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-16 20:46 +0000
        Re: datatype for bit flags pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-16 18:00 -0400
        Re: datatype for bit flags Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-09-18 05:00 -0700
          Re: datatype for bit flags Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-09-18 13:36 +0000
      Re: datatype for bit flags "Tony" <nospamme@ever.net> - 2011-09-16 16:47 -0500
        Re: datatype for bit flags pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-16 18:35 -0400
          Re: datatype for bit flags Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-16 16:25 -0700
            Re: datatype for bit flags pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-17 02:35 -0400
              Re: datatype for bit flags Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-17 14:42 -0700
          Re: datatype for bit flags "Tony" <nospamme@ever.net> - 2011-09-16 19:27 -0500
  Re: datatype for bit flags hanukas <jukka@liimatta.org> - 2011-09-23 03:56 -0700

csiph-web