Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 11 May 2011 08:42:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4DCA9233.1D4C@mindspring.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Wed, 11 May 2011 09:42:11 -0400 |
| From | pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-To | pfiland@mindspring.com |
| Organization | PF |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? |
| References | <e3632e70-5adf-4f04-807a-30634a5fc405@s41g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <78ab67fd-3a5e-49f2-8179-9501f22cbe26@n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <slrnisjaum.1rgs.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net> <936e1159-697f-4f9f-9b20-c1ec8fdf9364@35g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 40 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 4.154.223.42 |
| X-Trace | sv3-rJSs7b1209CH1gmULrnHKFSJkvxNDHR4qKe9X77fV1UIkEtFCJi47giR17QveWNBpCwYPNJWg8tKvjT!DvDsGnRbPhOdh0X0CCPIViurdLwhxawC9NFFUVK7NXldCW4fpDq7LIYhMT+0AhwuZMbt2fFv7Ud6!zahMIuFeiw== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2692 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:3751 |
Show key headers only | View raw
luser- -droog wrote:
>
> On May 10, 4:22 pm, Seebs <usenet-nos...@seebs.net> wrote:
> > On 2011-05-10, Kleuskes & Moos <kleu...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > {
> > > /* Some comment */
> > > including one too few "{" and "}"
> > > }
> > > I'm sure you'll make a lot less errors. Braces are so important in
> > > determining the structure of a C program, they deserve their own line.
> >
> > This is not 1TBS. Therefore it's wrong.
> >
> > Here's the thing: Brace styles are all viable. Any of them will work.
> > But it's VERY useful to have everyone use the same style.
> >
> > There is no way to pick a standard except by appeal to authority. Therefore,
> > use the brace style from K&R. That's the closest we'll ever have to a
> > proper authority.
> >
> > > And don't try to tell me that whitespace costs money, since that's
> > > only valid on paper.
> >
> > It's not money, it's visual real estate. I can only see so many lines
> > at a time. Seeing a few more lines of code at a time is a pretty noticeable
> > payoff.
> >
>
> Strongly agree. I do most of my work on 9-inch notebook screen.
> To get more than 25 or so lines, I'd have to make the font smaller
> and harder to read.
I'm on the other side of that.
I don't write programs that fit on a screen anymore,
so my preference is for what does show up on screen
to be as legible as possible.
--
pete
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? David Mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 09:00 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Tom St Denis <tom@iahu.ca> - 2011-05-10 10:08 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-05-10 10:30 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? David Mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 15:54 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? David Mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 15:56 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-10 17:41 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-05-10 21:07 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-05-10 19:32 -0400
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-05-10 23:32 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-05-11 11:49 -0400
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-05-11 14:19 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-10 10:37 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-10 13:34 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-10 21:22 +0000
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-10 16:00 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-11 03:16 +0000
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-11 12:32 +1200
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-10 17:56 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2011-05-10 21:09 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-11 16:14 +1200
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-05-10 21:19 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-11 16:26 +1200
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-05-11 07:10 +0100
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-11 20:50 +1200
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-05-11 18:53 +0100
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-05-11 11:23 -0400
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-11 05:30 +0000
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Jonathan Leffler <jleffler@earthlink.net> - 2011-05-10 21:26 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-11 08:07 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-11 06:04 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-05-11 09:42 -0400
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-10 17:34 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? David Mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 08:44 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-12 13:41 -0400
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net> - 2011-05-12 12:08 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2011-05-12 15:28 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-12 11:49 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? David Mathog <dmathog@gmail.com> - 2011-05-13 08:56 -0700
Re: compiler switch to indicate "end of function"? "robertwessel2@yahoo.com" <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-14 00:03 -0700
csiph-web