Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #394819
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? |
| Date | 2025-10-27 22:33 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20251027223319.00006ea9@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <20251024173549.00002111@yahoo.com> <10dg5kb$2m3c5$2@dont-email.me> <10dnf4o$2a744$1@dont-email.me> <10dnmd5$pgig$1@dont-email.me> <10doec7$2a744$2@dont-email.me> |
On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:41:11 -0400 James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: > On 2025-10-27 07:52, Janis Papanagnou wrote: > > On 27.10.2025 10:48, James Kuyper wrote: > >> On 2025-10-24 11:22, Janis Papanagnou wrote: > >>> On 24.10.2025 16:35, Michael S wrote: > >> ...>> Actually, the number of calls in naive recursive variant = > >> 2*FIB(N)-1. > >>>> So, O(1.618**n) - a little less bad than your suggestion. > >>> > >>> It's new to me that O-complexities would be written with > >>> decimals. > >> > >> Complexities are determined by the highest power of the relevant > >> parameter; that power needn't be integral, though it usually is. > >> I'd be interested in the derivation of that result. > > My apologies. For some reason I read that at N^1.618, not 1.618^N. IMHO, you don't have to apologize. Janis's arguamnet make no sense inboth cases. Will A1+B1*pow(N, 2) always outpace A2+B2*pow(N, 1.618) when N is big enough ? Yes, it will. Will A1+B1*pow(2, N) always outpace A2+B2*pow(1.618, N) when N is big enough ? Yes, it will.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-09-30 17:54 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-09-30 18:04 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-01 00:15 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-09-30 16:12 +0000
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-01 00:07 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-10-01 10:05 +0100
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-01 19:01 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-01 19:08 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-10-02 00:48 +0100
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-02 05:25 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-10-03 15:09 +0100
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-03 16:47 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-10-01 00:02 +0100
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-10-01 01:22 +0000
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-23 00:37 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-10-22 23:36 +0000
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2025-10-24 09:53 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-24 15:36 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-24 17:35 +0300
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-24 17:22 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-10-24 17:14 +0000
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-24 20:31 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-10-24 23:59 +0000
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-10-27 05:48 -0400
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-10-27 12:52 +0100
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-10-27 14:41 -0400
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-10-27 22:33 +0200
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-10-27 16:52 -0400
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-10-27 21:03 +0000
Re: Optimization of cascading recursions in "C" compilers? antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-10-28 01:58 +0000
csiph-web