Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Clang vs. GCC: Compare & Contrast? |
| Date | 2012-03-23 18:51 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20120323113102.507@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | <20372250.150.1332525190660.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcuk5> |
On 2012-03-23, haziz <hsaziz@gmail.com> wrote: > Any advantages or disadvantages to using clang, as opposed to GCC, for > developing in C on Linux? In my case this would be used for student level > programs, not production, though you are free to discuss that as well. The most educational thing is to compile your homework programs with as many compilers as you can get your hands on without spending an unreasonable time. Run your student programs through clang as well as gcc and study their diagnostics. It's like going to two doctors to get a second opinion.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Clang vs. GCC: Compare & Contrast? haziz <hsaziz@gmail.com> - 2012-03-23 10:53 -0700 Re: Clang vs. GCC: Compare & Contrast? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-03-23 18:32 +0000 Re: Clang vs. GCC: Compare & Contrast? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-03-23 18:51 +0000 Re: Clang vs. GCC: Compare & Contrast? Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-03-24 00:27 +0100
csiph-web