Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | asit <lipun4u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-07-31 13:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-08-01 18:39 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
singleton design asit <lipun4u@gmail.com> - 2011-07-31 13:22 -0700
Re: singleton design Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-07-31 22:29 +0200
Re: singleton design Lasse Reichstein Nielsen <lrn.unread@gmail.com> - 2011-08-01 18:39 +0200
| From | asit <lipun4u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-31 13:22 -0700 |
| Subject | singleton design |
| Message-ID | <320ced85-f297-49bd-80a1-4c3f23aee7ba@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
I want to design a singleton class. here the rule is to make the constructor private. That's okey. What about copy constructor and assignment operator. If I make it private, certain things like copying and assigning will lead to compiler error. How can I handle them ??
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-31 22:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <4e35bb1c$0$30717$5fc3050@news.tiscali.nl> |
| In reply to | #8363 |
Op 31-Jul-11 22:22, asit schreef: > I want to design a singleton class. here the rule is to make the > constructor private. That's okey. What about copy constructor > and assignment operator. If I make it private, certain things > like copying and assigning will lead to compiler error. > How can I handle them ?? It wouldn't be really a singleton if you could copy it, nor would it make sense to support assignment if only one can exist, would it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lasse Reichstein Nielsen <lrn.unread@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-08-01 18:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vcuhjdb6.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #8363 |
asit <lipun4u@gmail.com> writes: > I want to design a singleton class. Ick. Please reconsider. There is usually no good reason to enforce that there is only one instance of a class. Modelling-wise it might make sense to only actually create one instance, but using the singleton (anti-)pattern tends to bite you if you want to test either the class itself or classes depending on it. > here the rule is to make the constructor private. That's okey. What > about copy constructor and assignment operator. If I make it > private, certain things like copying and assigning will lead to > compiler error. How can I handle them ?? If you want to only have one copy, you don't want to have assignment or copying creating more than one instance. If the object is immutable, it might not make any difference, but it still prevents it from being a singleton. You should only pass the object around by reference or pointer. /L -- Lasse Reichstein Holst Nielsen DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html> 'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web