Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #84323 > unrolled thread

Wikipedia

Started byBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
First post2022-05-29 02:59 +0200
Last post2022-06-01 18:39 +0200
Articles 20 on this page of 157 — 19 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++

Contents

  Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 02:59 +0200
    Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-29 05:46 +0000
      Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 08:03 +0200
        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 08:34 +0200
        Re: Wikipedia Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-05-29 01:36 -0700
          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 10:37 +0200
            Re: Wikipedia Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-05-29 02:09 -0700
              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 11:16 +0200
                Re: Wikipedia Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-05-29 03:08 -0700
                  Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 12:44 +0200
                Re: Wikipedia Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-05-29 16:05 +0300
                  Re: Wikipedia Freethinker <freethinker@mymail.com> - 2022-05-29 15:19 +0200
                  Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 15:27 +0200
                    Re: Wikipedia Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-05-29 17:26 +0100
                      Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 19:18 +0200
                      Re: Wikipedia scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-05-29 17:49 +0000
                      Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-05-30 00:25 +0200
                        Re: Wikipedia Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2022-06-04 13:00 -0400
                          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-04 19:19 +0200
              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 11:48 +0200
            Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-30 06:06 +0000
              Re: Wikipedia Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2022-06-04 13:02 -0400
      Re: Wikipedia Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-05-29 17:18 +0100
        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-29 18:22 +0200
          Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-30 06:08 +0000
            Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 04:41 +0200
        Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-05-30 06:06 +0000
    Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-30 19:31 +0100
    Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-30 19:52 +0100
      Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-05-31 14:34 +0200
        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 15:15 +0200
          Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-31 18:00 +0100
            Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 19:06 +0200
              Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-31 18:43 +0100
                Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 19:48 +0200
                  Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 09:26 +0200
                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 09:44 +0200
                      Re: Wikipedia Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-06-01 01:47 -0700
                        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 13:53 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 17:05 +0200
                            Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 17:06 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-02 04:57 +0000
                            Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 07:43 +0200
                              Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-02 08:53 +0000
                                Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 12:56 +0200
                                  Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-02 12:46 +0000
                                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 14:56 +0200
                                      Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:14 +0000
                                        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 06:19 +0200
                                          Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:26 +0000
                                          Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-06-03 14:22 +0100
                                            Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 15:34 +0200
                                            Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 07:24 -0700
                                              Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 14:56 +0000
                                                Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 08:06 -0700
                                                  Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-03 17:30 +0200
                                                    Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 10:37 -0700
                                                      Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-03 20:33 +0200
                                                        Re: Wikipedia scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-06-03 18:59 +0000
                                                          Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 12:35 -0700
                                                          Re: Wikipedia Freethinker <freethinker@mymail.com> - 2022-06-03 23:42 +0200
                                                            Re: Wikipedia Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-06-04 08:10 +0000
                                                        Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 11:59 -0700
                                                          Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-04 15:27 +0200
                                                  Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-04 15:31 +0000
                                              Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-06-03 17:02 +0200
                                                Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 08:11 -0700
                                              Re: Wikipedia "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 14:23 -0700
                                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 14:58 +0200
                                    Re: Wikipedia Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-06-04 08:00 -0700
                                  Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-02 16:00 +0200
                                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 16:09 +0200
                                      Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 16:14 +0200
                                  Re: Wikipedia Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2022-06-04 13:20 -0400
                                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-04 19:23 +0200
                                Re: Wikipedia Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 04:40 -0700
                                  Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 14:00 +0200
                                    Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-02 12:47 +0000
                                      Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 14:59 +0200
                                        Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:17 +0000
                                          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 06:20 +0200
                                            Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:27 +0000
                                  Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-02 16:13 +0200
                                    Re: Wikipedia Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 10:09 -0700
                                      Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-02 22:35 +0200
                                        Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:22 +0000
                                          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 06:23 +0200
                                            Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:28 +0000
                                              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 06:35 +0200
                                                Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 05:22 +0000
                                                  Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 07:23 +0200
                                                    Re: Wikipedia "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 22:25 -0700
                                                      Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 07:28 +0200
                                                        Re: Wikipedia "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-06-02 22:31 -0700
                                                          Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 06:22 +0000
                                                            Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 08:38 +0200
                                                              Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 10:14 +0000
                                                      Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 06:32 -0700
                                                        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 15:35 +0200
                                                        Re: Wikipedia "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2022-06-03 14:12 -0700
                                          Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-03 10:31 +0200
                                Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-06-02 19:12 +0200
                                Re: Wikipedia Popping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2022-06-04 13:09 -0400
                            Re: Wikipedia Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-02 17:54 +0100
                              Re: Wikipedia Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-06-02 20:40 +0300
                                Re: Wikipedia Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-06-02 18:50 +0100
                              Re: Wikipedia Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-06-03 04:25 +0000
                        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 14:21 +0200
                        Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 06:17 -0700
                          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 15:34 +0200
                            Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 07:13 -0700
                              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 16:55 +0200
                      Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 16:29 +0200
                        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 16:56 +0200
                        Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 07:58 -0700
                          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 17:07 +0200
                            Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 17:50 +0200
                              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 18:11 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 17:41 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-06-01 17:42 +0200
                            Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 09:12 -0700
                              Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-06-01 18:35 +0200
                                Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 18:36 +0200
                                  Re: Wikipedia Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-06-01 18:59 +0200
                                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 19:04 +0200
                                Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 10:04 -0700
                                Re: Wikipedia Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-06-07 08:28 -0700
                              Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 21:22 +0200
                                Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 13:43 -0700
                                  Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-02 10:07 +0200
                            Re: Wikipedia Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-06-07 08:21 -0700
                              Re: Wikipedia "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2022-06-10 07:18 -0700
                Re: Wikipedia muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-05-31 18:34 +0000
                  Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-31 19:37 +0100
                    Re: Wikipedia muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-05-31 18:42 +0000
                      Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-31 20:00 +0100
                        Re: Wikipedia muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-05-31 19:19 +0000
                          Re: Wikipedia Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-31 20:28 +0100
                            Re: Wikipedia muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-06-01 18:07 +0000
                              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 20:28 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-05-31 19:37 +0000
                            Re: Wikipedia Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-05-31 21:27 +0100
                          Re: "std::" (was: Wikipedia) Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-05-31 21:17 +0100
                            Re: "std::" (was: Wikipedia) Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 06:33 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 09:34 +0200
                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 05:40 +0200
        Re: Wikipedia Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> - 2022-05-31 17:18 +0100
          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-05-31 18:25 +0200
            Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 09:38 +0200
              Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 09:46 +0200
                Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 10:16 +0200
                  Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 10:21 +0200
                  Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 17:13 +0200
                    Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 17:15 +0200
                      Re: Wikipedia David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-06-01 18:12 +0200
                        Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 18:18 +0200
                          Re: Wikipedia Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-06-01 18:39 +0200

Page 1 of 8  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

#84323 — Wikipedia

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 02:59 +0200
SubjectWikipedia
Message-ID<t6ugh5$5tc$1@dont-email.me>
I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject
arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process.

	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code

With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside.
Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the
text that comes along the source code a smarter english.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#84325

FromJuha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid>
Date2022-05-29 05:46 +0000
Message-ID<t6v1aq$9tl$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#84323
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject
> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process.
> 
>        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code
> 
> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside.
> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the
> text that comes along the source code a smarter english.

If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the
"using namespace std" bullshit out of it.

If you want to use it in your own code, fine. If you want to use it in
code you post here, fine (expect to be mocked by me). But keep that
bullshit out of code you post to educational websites.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84326

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 08:03 +0200
Message-ID<t6v2bh$uth$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84325
Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen:
> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject
>> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process.
>>
>>         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code
>>
>> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside.
>> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the
>> text that comes along the source code a smarter english.
> 
> If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the
> "using namespace std" bullshit out of it.

Idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84327

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 08:34 +0200
Message-ID<t6v468$v7f$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84326
Am 29.05.2022 um 08:03 schrieb Bonita Montero:
> Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen:
>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject
>>> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process.
>>>
>>>         https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code
>>>
>>> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside.
>>> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the
>>> text that comes along the source code a smarter english.
>>
>> If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the
>> "using namespace std" bullshit out of it.

Hey, I've got an idea: you could make even more friends
if you urge Java-developers not to use import !!! Hrhr.

> Idiot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84332

FromÖö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee>
Date2022-05-29 01:36 -0700
Message-ID<1333333e-92a3-4a8c-8c4b-93ffed9d2af5n@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#84326
On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 09:03:44 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen: 
> > Bonita Montero <Bonita....@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject 
> >> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process. 
> >> 
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code 
> >> 
> >> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside. 
> >> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the 
> >> text that comes along the source code a smarter english. 
> > 
> > If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the 
> > "using namespace std" bullshit out of it.
> Idiot.

Stop mirroring your health issues to others, it looks sad.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84333

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 10:37 +0200
Message-ID<t6vbbq$6pe$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84332
Am 29.05.2022 um 10:36 schrieb Öö Tiib:
> On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 09:03:44 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen:
>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject
>>>> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code
>>>>
>>>> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside.
>>>> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the
>>>> text that comes along the source code a smarter english.
>>>
>>> If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the
>>> "using namespace std" bullshit out of it.
>> Idiot.
> 
> Stop mirroring your health issues to others, it looks sad.

I don't have health problems except diabetes.
But being so intolerant with others using "using"
is simlpy compulsive and a sign of mental illness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84334

FromÖö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee>
Date2022-05-29 02:09 -0700
Message-ID<0a11a8b9-5caa-4405-a566-76916f84d4aen@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#84333
On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 11:37:30 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 29.05.2022 um 10:36 schrieb Öö Tiib: 
> > On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 09:03:44 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote: 
> >> Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen: 
> >>> Bonita Montero <Bonita....@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject 
> >>>> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code 
> >>>> 
> >>>> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside. 
> >>>> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the 
> >>>> text that comes along the source code a smarter english. 
> >>> 
> >>> If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the 
> >>> "using namespace std" bullshit out of it. 
> >> Idiot. 
> > 
> > Stop mirroring your health issues to others, it looks sad.
> I don't have health problems except diabetes. 
> But being so intolerant with others using "using" 
> is simlpy compulsive and a sign of mental illness.

The "using namespace std;" is avoided in vast majority of actual C++
code-bases and explicitly banned in lot of coding standards. It is
widely considered as bad practice. The namespace contains very lot of
very common words as names so importing these to global 
namespace will cause some name clashes sooner or later.  Your
connecting that to mental health is groundless. Bringing mental
health into discussion looks like mirroring your own complications.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84335

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 11:16 +0200
Message-ID<t6vdkv$l58$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84334
Am 29.05.2022 um 11:09 schrieb Öö Tiib:
> On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 11:37:30 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Am 29.05.2022 um 10:36 schrieb Öö Tiib:
>>> On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 09:03:44 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>> Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen:
>>>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject
>>>>>> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside.
>>>>>> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the
>>>>>> text that comes along the source code a smarter english.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the
>>>>> "using namespace std" bullshit out of it.
>>>> Idiot.
>>>
>>> Stop mirroring your health issues to others, it looks sad.
>> I don't have health problems except diabetes.
>> But being so intolerant with others using "using"
>> is simlpy compulsive and a sign of mental illness.
> 
> The "using namespace std;" is avoided in vast majority of actual
> C++ code-bases and explicitly banned in lot of coding standards.

Where are the statistics ?

> It is widely considered as bad practice.

Where are the statistics ?

> The namespace contains very lot of
> very common words as names so importing these to global
> namespace will cause some name clashes sooner or later. 

The usage of std::functions is so common that no one would provide
code that has these overlappings because everyone knows what the
problems would be.

> Your connecting that to mental health is groundless.

Being so intolerant here is a certain sign of mental illnes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84337

FromÖö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee>
Date2022-05-29 03:08 -0700
Message-ID<0ae05a8a-2450-47c9-b491-bf4956bdf7ban@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#84335
On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 12:16:30 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 29.05.2022 um 11:09 schrieb Öö Tiib: 
> > On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 11:37:30 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote: 
> >> Am 29.05.2022 um 10:36 schrieb Öö Tiib: 
> >>> On Sunday, 29 May 2022 at 09:03:44 UTC+3, Bonita Montero wrote: 
> >>>> Am 29.05.2022 um 07:46 schrieb Juha Nieminen: 
> >>>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita....@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>>>> I added some lengthly code to the Wikipedia which helps to inject 
> >>>>>> arbitrary code in to a foreign Win32-process. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_injection#Sample_Code 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> With that you can easily manipulate a foreign process from inside. 
> >>>>>> Maybe you find some bugs or give the source documentation or the 
> >>>>>> text that comes along the source code a smarter english. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> If you are going to add code to wikipedia, at least keep the 
> >>>>> "using namespace std" bullshit out of it. 
> >>>> Idiot. 
> >>> 
> >>> Stop mirroring your health issues to others, it looks sad. 
> >> I don't have health problems except diabetes. 
> >> But being so intolerant with others using "using" 
> >> is simlpy compulsive and a sign of mental illness. 
> > 
> > The "using namespace std;" is avoided in vast majority of actual 
> > C++ code-bases and explicitly banned in lot of coding standards.
> 
> Where are the statistics ?
> 
> > It is widely considered as bad practice.
> 
> Where are the statistics ?

It is even hard to find any that suggest to use "using namespace std;" as
good practice. All places say that it just defeats the point of namespace
feature. About like that:
 <https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/coding-standards#using-namespace-std>
So what is the point of making statistics about clear vast majority?

> > The namespace contains very lot of 
> > very common words as names so importing these to global 
> > namespace will cause some name clashes sooner or later.
> 
> The usage of std::functions is so common that no one would provide 
> code that has these overlappings because everyone knows what the 
> problems would be.

Nonsense. People will continue using common handy names like "count",
"find", "set", "sort" etc. in their code like they always did. An asshole who
writes "using namespace std;" to make it difficult for others will be just
kicked out of team. People have work to do and do not have time for to
deal with complications cased by or to wrestle with an asshole. 

> > Your connecting that to mental health is groundless.
> Being so intolerant here is a certain sign of mental illnes.

It is not. It is just common sense. Software projects worth writing 
are already complex and involve big teams and usage of several
libraries. People can't just refactor the libraries out of blue because
an asshole decided to write  "using namespace std;". So it will not
be not tolerated and that is normal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84338

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 12:44 +0200
Message-ID<t6vipe$mj5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84337
> It is even hard to find any that suggest to use "using namespace std;" as
> good practice. All places say that it just defeats the point of namespace
> feature. About like that:
>   <https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/coding-standards#using-namespace-std>
> So what is the point of making statistics about clear vast majority?

You simply don't know that it's the majority.
And I don't know where the problem is for you that you become
so extremely upset. It's not your code in the Wikipedia and
we're not working together on a project.
It's simply: people becoming so upset about such things other
can ignore because bother them are simply mentally disordered.
You're a pathologic type of nerd.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84343

FromPaavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee>
Date2022-05-29 16:05 +0300
Message-ID<t6vr29$b9a$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84335
29.05.2022 12:16 Bonita Montero kirjutas:
> The usage of std::functions is so common that no one would provide
> code that has these overlappings because everyone knows what the
> problems would be.

I see. So here is a quick quiz for you, can you say without looking it 
up which one of those names is not defined in namespace std and can be 
used without a fear of conflicts?

atto
barrier
invocable
minus
normal
regular
sample
semiregular
showpoint
zepto

Which is another one whose presence depends on the implementation?

What about the names which will be added to the namespace std in future 
standard revisions? Can you predict these as well?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84345

FromFreethinker <freethinker@mymail.com>
Date2022-05-29 15:19 +0200
Message-ID<t6vrsc$1sfn$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#84343
On 29.05.22 15:05, Paavo Helde wrote:
> 29.05.2022 12:16 Bonita Montero kirjutas:
>> The usage of std::functions is so common that no one would provide
>> code that has these overlappings because everyone knows what the
>> problems would be.
> 
> I see. So here is a quick quiz for you, can you say without looking it 
> up which one of those names is not defined in namespace std and can be 
> used without a fear of conflicts?
> 
> atto
> barrier
> invocable
> minus
> normal
> regular
> sample
> semiregular
> showpoint
> zepto
> 
> Which is another one whose presence depends on the implementation?
> 
> What about the names which will be added to the namespace std in future 
> standard revisions? Can you predict these as well?
> 

OK, given the fact that Bonita is not adding anything meaningful to any 
conversation she (or he, who knows nowadays!?) is involved in and is in 
serious need of psychiatric help, I see two possible solutions:
- You guys edit the Wikipedia page yourselves and remove the "using" part.
- You keep arguing with Bonita, thereby possibly ending up in the same 
sanatorium (where you can continue your interesting conversation without 
pesting the newsgroup).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84347

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 15:27 +0200
Message-ID<t6vsb0$jr8$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84343
Am 29.05.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Paavo Helde:
> 29.05.2022 12:16 Bonita Montero kirjutas:
>> The usage of std::functions is so common that no one would provide
>> code that has these overlappings because everyone knows what the
>> problems would be.
> 
> I see. So here is a quick quiz for you, can you say without looking it 
> up which one of those names is not defined in namespace std and can be 
> used without a fear of conflicts?
> 
> atto
> barrier
> invocable
> minus
> normal
> regular
> sample
> semiregular
> showpoint
> zepto
> 
> Which is another one whose presence depends on the implementation?

Even the C++ Core Guidelines recomment to use using.
You're stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84357

FromManu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid>
Date2022-05-29 17:26 +0100
Message-ID<t706vl$4dt$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84347
On 29/05/2022 14:27, Bonita Montero wrote:
>
> Even the C++ Core Guidelines recomment to use using.
> You're stupid.


Best thing to do is to ignore the people who are used to criticising 
everything on these newsgroups but they themselves are not willing to do 
anything for themselves. Their only expertise is to criticise anybody 
who wants to do something unique. Apart from you, I have not heard of 
anybody here who has posted anything on Wikipedia where they will get 
scrutiny by experts from universities and industries.

Congratulations and please keep it up. You are doing something and you 
should be commended for your work.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84359

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 19:18 +0200
Message-ID<t709su$plp$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84357
Am 29.05.2022 um 18:26 schrieb Manu Raju:
> On 29/05/2022 14:27, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>
>> Even the C++ Core Guidelines recomment to use using.
>> You're stupid.
> 
> 
> Best thing to do is to ignore the people who are used to criticising
> everything on these newsgroups but they themselves are not willing to
> do anything for themselves. Their only expertise is to criticise anybody
> who wants to do something unique. Apart from you, I have not heard of
> anybody here who has posted anything on Wikipedia where they will get
> scrutiny by experts from universities and industries.

Using std::-prefixes and being absolutely intolerant with other doing
hat not is simply pathological compulsivity.
The C++ Core Guidelines are a reasonable reference which is nearly
unimpeachable in that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84363

Fromscott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
Date2022-05-29 17:49 +0000
Message-ID<SmOkK.36375$3Gzd.33498@fx96.iad>
In reply to#84357
Manu Raju <MR@invalid.invalid> writes:
>On 29/05/2022 14:27, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>
>> Even the C++ Core Guidelines recomment to use using.
>> You're stupid.
>
>
>Best thing to do is to ignore the people who are used to criticising 
>everything on these newsgroups but they themselves are not willing to do 
>anything for themselves. Their only expertise is to criticise anybody 
>who wants to do something unique. Apart from you, I have not heard of 
>anybody here who has posted anything on Wikipedia where they will get 
>scrutiny by experts from universities and industries.
>
>Congratulations and please keep it up. You are doing something and you 
>should be commended for your work.
>
>

So Bonita now has to resort to sock puppets (Manu Raju) for the
adulation she expects.  Sad.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84367

FromManfred <noname@add.invalid>
Date2022-05-30 00:25 +0200
Message-ID<t70rsg$1r2u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#84357
On 5/29/2022 6:26 PM, Manu Raju wrote:
> On 29/05/2022 14:27, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>
>> Even the C++ Core Guidelines recomment to use using.
>> You're stupid.
> 
> 
> Best thing to do is to ignore the people who are used to criticising
> everything on these newsgroups but they themselves are not willing to do
> anything for themselves. Their only expertise is to criticise anybody
> who wants to do something unique. Apart from you, I have not heard of
> anybody here who has posted anything on Wikipedia

Posting on Wikipedia does not make you an expert on anything. As you 
know yourself, anyone can write there.

  where they will get
> scrutiny by experts from universities and industries.

That's not guaranteed at all. AFAIK there is no official review panel on 
Wikipedia, is there?

> 
> Congratulations and please keep it up. You are doing something and you
> should be commended for your work.
> 
> 

No, the critique about the using directive is correct, and reliable 
reference of why it is wrong has been given.
Self presumptuous people that insist on "teaching" something can 
actually cause damage to the inexperienced reader. Nothing to praise 
about it.

Besides, as someone once wrote, there is nothing worse than someone who 
doesn't know how to play violin, but still insists on doing it.
At least, don't spread the noise.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84535

FromPopping Mad <rainbow@colition.gov>
Date2022-06-04 13:00 -0400
Message-ID<t7g35t$2ic$1@reader1.panix.com>
In reply to#84367
On 5/29/22 18:25, Manfred wrote:
> AFAIK there is no official review panel on Wikipedia, is there?


There is no expertise panel on Wikipedia at all.  It is comprised and
run by extremely neurotic, crazies who build arcane rules and even more
arcane mechanisms in the software to trigger the rules to keep normal
people and true experts from getting overly involved.  Add a touch of
antisemitism, racialism, ego mongering and that is wikipedea.

You have to have an especially pathological neurological condition to
get more than passingly involved with any aspect of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84538

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-06-04 19:19 +0200
Message-ID<t7g47c$6c8$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84535
Am 04.06.2022 um 19:00 schrieb Popping Mad:

> There is no expertise panel on Wikipedia at all.  It is comprised and
> run by extremely neurotic, crazies who build arcane rules and even more
> arcane mechanisms in the software to trigger the rules to keep normal
> people and true experts from getting overly involved.  Add a touch of
> antisemitism, racialism, ego mongering and that is wikipedea.

... says someone with the abvove name.

> You have to have an especially pathological neurological condition
> to get more than passingly involved with any aspect of it.

Yes, and removing std:: in WP is a sign of mental health.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#84336

FromBonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Date2022-05-29 11:48 +0200
Message-ID<t6vfhm$pce$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#84334
C++ Core Guidlines:
"We assume knowledge of the standard library.
For example, we use plain vector rather than std::vector".

Idiot!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 8  [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++

csiph-web