Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #69492 > unrolled thread
| Started by | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-10-30 09:58 -0700 |
| Last post | 2020-08-04 18:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 87 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-10-30 09:58 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-10-30 18:16 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-10-30 18:27 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-10-30 22:13 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-10-30 22:36 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-10-31 20:35 +1300
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-10-31 10:28 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-01 08:24 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com> - 2019-11-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-11-02 12:43 +1300
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2019-11-01 17:47 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-01 19:07 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-02 16:33 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 10:46 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-02 10:21 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 10:26 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-02 17:43 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-02 18:52 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 11:11 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-02 20:16 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com> - 2019-11-02 16:59 -0400
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-02 21:23 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 17:49 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 17:14 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-03 01:15 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-03 03:51 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2021-03-09 20:24 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-03 11:35 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-03 20:04 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2019-11-04 08:07 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-04 09:08 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-07 08:17 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-11-07 16:52 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-07 10:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-11-07 21:33 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-09 16:28 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-11 22:33 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-12 08:26 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-12 15:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-01-31 21:59 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2020-12-03 09:40 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2020-12-03 09:40 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 20:48 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-04 01:00 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-03 05:20 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-03 11:12 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-04 00:30 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-04 11:03 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-11 23:38 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-11 23:39 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-02 20:37 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-02-08 19:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-02-09 19:52 +1300
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-09 12:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-02-27 20:19 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-02-28 16:50 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 15:34 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 15:37 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-02-28 16:24 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-02-29 03:48 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 21:33 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-02-29 06:28 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 22:34 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-02-29 06:51 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-02-29 07:34 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 23:40 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-01 14:46 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-01 12:59 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-01 22:47 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2020-03-01 22:14 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-03-03 08:06 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-02 13:21 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-02 13:24 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-03 08:11 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-03 01:31 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-03 01:33 -0800
exception with distinct data members and concatenated what "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 08:24 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-12-08 10:26 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 11:00 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-12-08 13:17 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2020-12-08 22:13 +0200
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 23:38 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-02-29 06:50 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 23:32 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-08-04 18:28 -0700
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-01-31 21:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <0bd634da-13b9-403c-b4ae-d5b92b0cf432@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69726 |
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 5:55:01 PM UTC-6, Keith Thompson wrote: > > How did you install gcc10? > > I'm not very familiar with FreeBSD, but on some systems "gcc" and "g++" > are separate packages. cc1plus is the C++ frontend, invoked by the g++ > command. It's typically installed under a "libexec" directory, so g++ > can find it but it's not in your $PATH. If you installed gcc-10 with > support for C but not for C++, that could explain what you saw -- except > that the "g++10" command itself probably shouldn't have been visible. > Good answer. I'm getting back into the swing of things. Please bear with me. From Foxnews: Italian man denied Swiss citizenship for not knowing bears and wolves shared enclosure at zoo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-12-03 09:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <7ab94010-7fd3-4c17-9a63-239189311a0fn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69642 |
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:34:00 PM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > >> >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > I have this in a server: > >> >> > > >> >> > #ifdef __linux__ > >> >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> > >> >> > #else > >> >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > >> >> > #endif > >> >> > > >> >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > >> >> > >> >> Every platform that is not Linux? > >> >> > >> >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the > >> >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it > >> >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new > >> >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll > >> >> get technical answers. > >> >> > >> >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > >> >> > so this is a drag. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it > >> >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. > >> > > >> > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and > >> > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. > >> > >> Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API > >> extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from > >> that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? > >> > >> I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention > >> which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. > >> > > > > Is there anything wrong with netinet/sctp.h? If not, I suggest > > that as the home. > It's analogous to netinet/tcp.h, udp.h and so on, so I guess that's > the right place. And it's what the RFC uses in its examples (although > it doesn't say anything about that being normative). > /Jorgen > This man page: https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/sctp.7.html says netinet/sctp.h, but on my Linux Mint system, the file is still at linux/sctp.h. The biggest wart in my middle tier is courtesy of Linux. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - Enjoying programming again. https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-12-03 09:40 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b17b8040-1b6d-4f33-b0df-c3789afe68fbn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69642 |
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:34:00 PM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > >> >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > I have this in a server: > >> >> > > >> >> > #ifdef __linux__ > >> >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> > >> >> > #else > >> >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > >> >> > #endif > >> >> > > >> >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > >> >> > >> >> Every platform that is not Linux? > >> >> > >> >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the > >> >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it > >> >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new > >> >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll > >> >> get technical answers. > >> >> > >> >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > >> >> > so this is a drag. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it > >> >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. > >> > > >> > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and > >> > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. > >> > >> Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API > >> extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from > >> that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? > >> > >> I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention > >> which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. > >> > > > > Is there anything wrong with netinet/sctp.h? If not, I suggest > > that as the home. > It's analogous to netinet/tcp.h, udp.h and so on, so I guess that's > the right place. And it's what the RFC uses in its examples (although > it doesn't say anything about that being normative). > /Jorgen > This man page: https://www.man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/sctp.7.html says netinet/sctp.h, but on my Linux Mint system, the file is still at linux/sctp.h. The biggest wart in my middle tier is courtesy of Linux. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - Enjoying programming again. https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-01-18 20:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <def6a913-5f51-414b-ad29-0f6a69e225c3n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69642 |
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:34:00 PM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > >> >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > I have this in a server: > >> >> > > >> >> > #ifdef __linux__ > >> >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> > >> >> > #else > >> >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > >> >> > #endif > >> >> > > >> >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > >> >> > >> >> Every platform that is not Linux? > >> >> > >> >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the > >> >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it > >> >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new > >> >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll > >> >> get technical answers. > >> >> > >> >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > >> >> > so this is a drag. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it > >> >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. > >> > > >> > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and > >> > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. > >> > >> Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API > >> extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from > >> that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? > >> > >> I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention > >> which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. > >> > > > > Is there anything wrong with netinet/sctp.h? If not, I suggest > > that as the home. > It's analogous to netinet/tcp.h, udp.h and so on, so I guess that's > the right place. And it's what the RFC uses in its examples (although > it doesn't say anything about that being normative). > /Jorgen > I've posted about this now on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/l0cb4h/home_of_sctph/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-04 01:00 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <lnimo0584a.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| In reply to | #69529 |
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 03/11/2019 03:01, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian?
>>
>> Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins."
>
> For those that don't know who Shapiro is, but (for some reason) want to
> know, here is an introduction.
[big snip]
> Again, politics has nothing to do with anything under discussion.
Do you want more discussions of politics here? Because this is
how you get more discussions of politics here.
Somebody cited Ben Shapiro, and in response you discussed Ben Shapiro
at considerable length -- with the intent, I guess, of saying that
discussing Ben Shapiro here is in appropriate.
Please, say that it's off-topic *without* engaging in further
off-topic discussion, or just ignore it. If you insist on replying
to off-topic posts that offend you, you encourage more of them.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-03 05:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qplkic$f95$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #69520 |
> I find most of your replies to be spam. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-03 11:12 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpm96h$uvt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69520 |
On 03/11/2019 01:14, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: > > > I find most of your replies to be spam. > You are free not to like my replies or posts. You can call them insulting, argumentative, pointless, off-topic, rambling - there are plenty of reasonable complaints you could make. But one thing they are not, is spam. I have never once posted unwanted adverts for my services or software.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-04 00:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <qponjn$1ev1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #69528 |
On 11/3/2019 2:12 AM, David Brown wrote: > On 03/11/2019 01:14, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: >> >> >> I find most of your replies to be spam. >> > > You are free not to like my replies or posts. You can call them > insulting, argumentative, pointless, off-topic, rambling - there are > plenty of reasonable complaints you could make. But one thing they are > not, is spam. I have never once posted unwanted adverts for my services > or software. > > I have gotten into a very informative and polite argument with you over "race-conditions" wrt C++11. Well, you are a nice guy David Brown. :^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-04 11:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpot13$3rd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69538 |
On 04/11/2019 09:30, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 11/3/2019 2:12 AM, David Brown wrote: >> On 03/11/2019 01:14, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: >>> >>> >>> I find most of your replies to be spam. >>> >> >> You are free not to like my replies or posts. You can call them >> insulting, argumentative, pointless, off-topic, rambling - there are >> plenty of reasonable complaints you could make. But one thing they >> are not, is spam. I have never once posted unwanted adverts for my >> services or software. >> >> > > I have gotten into a very informative and polite argument with you over > "race-conditions" wrt C++11. Well, you are a nice guy David Brown. :^) I learned a number of things from that discussion, and had some of my misconceptions corrected. It was, IMHO, a good example of how Usenet threads are supposed to be (unlike this one).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-11 23:38 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <qqdngu$159i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #69541 |
On 11/4/2019 2:03 AM, David Brown wrote: > On 04/11/2019 09:30, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 11/3/2019 2:12 AM, David Brown wrote: >>> On 03/11/2019 01:14, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I find most of your replies to be spam. >>>> >>> >>> You are free not to like my replies or posts. You can call them >>> insulting, argumentative, pointless, off-topic, rambling - there are >>> plenty of reasonable complaints you could make. But one thing they >>> are not, is spam. I have never once posted unwanted adverts for my >>> services or software. >>> >>> >> >> I have gotten into a very informative and polite argument with you over >> "race-conditions" wrt C++11. Well, you are a nice guy David Brown. :^) > > I learned a number of things from that discussion, and had some of my > misconceptions corrected. It was, IMHO, a good example of how Usenet > threads are supposed to be (unlike this one). > 100% Agreed. A medium for nice correspondence... Usenet? ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-11 23:39 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <qqdnis$159i$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #69714 |
On 11/11/2019 11:38 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 11/4/2019 2:03 AM, David Brown wrote: >> On 04/11/2019 09:30, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 11/3/2019 2:12 AM, David Brown wrote: >>>> On 03/11/2019 01:14, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I find most of your replies to be spam. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are free not to like my replies or posts. You can call them >>>> insulting, argumentative, pointless, off-topic, rambling - there are >>>> plenty of reasonable complaints you could make. But one thing they >>>> are not, is spam. I have never once posted unwanted adverts for my >>>> services or software. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I have gotten into a very informative and polite argument with you over >>> "race-conditions" wrt C++11. Well, you are a nice guy David Brown. :^) >> >> I learned a number of things from that discussion, and had some of my >> misconceptions corrected. It was, IMHO, a good example of how Usenet >> threads are supposed to be (unlike this one). >> > > 100% Agreed. A medium for nice correspondence... Usenet? ;^) Well, it takes two to tango, and if each person is nice, and able to not go crazy, well... Yes, Usenet is nice.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 13:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qpkobc$1p6e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #69511 |
On 11/2/2019 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: >>> Yes: delete it and stop posting here. > >> Over the years the functionality of the repo has increased >> while the size of the repo has decreased. I don't recall >> if you have ever provided an idea that I've found useful, >> but a lot of people in the newsgroup have. On behalf of >> those people and myself, I press on. > > Do you have noticed anyone interested in yor work here? > I didn't. Please, can you give a proper attribution? Almost begging. :^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 20:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9OlvF.13417$mB7.13246@fx32.am4> |
| In reply to | #69514 |
On 2019-11-02, Chris M. Thomasson <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/2/2019 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: >>>> Yes: delete it and stop posting here. >> >>> Over the years the functionality of the repo has increased >>> while the size of the repo has decreased. I don't recall >>> if you have ever provided an idea that I've found useful, >>> but a lot of people in the newsgroup have. On behalf of >>> those people and myself, I press on. >> >> Do you have noticed anyone interested in yor work here? >> I didn't. > > Please, can you give a proper attribution? Almost begging. :^) She is rude person... -- press any key to continue or any other to quit... U ničemu ja ne uživam kao u svom statusu INVALIDA -- Zli Zec Svi smo svedoci - oko 3 godine intenzivne propagande je dovoljno da jedan narod poludi -- Zli Zec Na divljem zapadu i nije bilo tako puno nasilja, upravo zato jer su svi bili naoruzani. -- Mladen Gogala
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-08 19:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <35fb22dc-2ba7-4b46-8c11-7c2e3fbf3d33@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69501 |
On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 2:25:05 AM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote: > > Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my > > repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards ? > > Yes: delete it and stop posting here. Sorry, but it's been onwards and upwards for over 20 years now. The software is better than it has ever been. Services are the way things have to be now. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-09 19:52 +1300 |
| Message-ID | <ha9oi4FlsndU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #71771 |
On 09/02/2020 16:54, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 2:25:05 AM UTC-5, Bonita Montero wrote: >>> Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my >>> repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards ? >> >> Yes: delete it and stop posting here. > > Sorry, but it's been onwards and upwards for over > 20 years now. The software is better than it has > ever been. Services are the way things have to be > now. You've been pedaling that snake oil for almost as long. -- Ian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-09 12:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <r1prhl$17p2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #69492 |
On 10/30/2019 9:58 AM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > Shalom > > Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my > repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards > ? > > What do you think of recent changes to this file? > https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/master/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc > > and a version from the end of September: > https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/9bc4c2646e7dc6421dfdcd9d1107d544c320a13a/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc > > The number of lines hasn't changed much, but the size of the > event loop, the most complicated part of the program, has been > reduced by switching from TCP to SCTP. Thanks in advance. Iirc, you require a user to "register" by sending you an email with their password in the clear?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-27 20:19 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ba794229-68a1-4baf-8fdf-ff1b0b1479ce@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #71776 |
On Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 2:54:28 PM UTC-6, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 10/30/2019 9:58 AM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > > Shalom > > > > Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my > > repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards > > ? > > > > What do you think of recent changes to this file? > > https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/master/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc > > > > and a version from the end of September: > > https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/9bc4c2646e7dc6421dfdcd9d1107d544c320a13a/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc > > > > The number of lines hasn't changed much, but the size of the > > event loop, the most complicated part of the program, has been > > reduced by switching from TCP to SCTP. Thanks in advance. > > Iirc, you require a user to "register" by sending you an email with > their password in the clear? I plan to use Wireguard for encryption so it could be done after we have that set up. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-28 16:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Fxb6G.58599$0z4.26828@fx15.ams1> |
| In reply to | #72048 |
On 28/02/2020 04:19, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 2:54:28 PM UTC-6, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 10/30/2019 9:58 AM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>> Shalom >>> >>> Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my >>> repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards >>> ? >>> >>> What do you think of recent changes to this file? >>> https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/master/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc >>> >>> and a version from the end of September: >>> https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/9bc4c2646e7dc6421dfdcd9d1107d544c320a13a/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc >>> >>> The number of lines hasn't changed much, but the size of the >>> event loop, the most complicated part of the program, has been >>> reduced by switching from TCP to SCTP. Thanks in advance. >> >> Iirc, you require a user to "register" by sending you an email with >> their password in the clear? > > I plan to use Wireguard for encryption so it > could be done after we have that set up. You don't understand how passwords work do you? You should NEVER be storing user's passwords whether they are encrypted or not on your servers: you should be HASHING the user password on the user's machine and sending that over an encrypted link. /Flibble -- "Snakes didn't evolve, instead talking snakes with legs changed into snakes." - Rick C. Hodgin “You won’t burn in hell. But be nice anyway.” – Ricky Gervais “I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn’t believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens.” – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Byrne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-28 15:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <r3c82a$b0o$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #72051 |
On 2/28/2020 8:50 AM, Mr Flibble wrote: > On 28/02/2020 04:19, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >> On Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 2:54:28 PM UTC-6, Chris M. Thomasson >> wrote: >>> On 10/30/2019 9:58 AM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>>> Shalom >>>> >>>> Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my >>>> repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards >>>> ? >>>> >>>> What do you think of recent changes to this file? >>>> https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/master/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc >>>> >>>> >>>> and a version from the end of September: >>>> https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/9bc4c2646e7dc6421dfdcd9d1107d544c320a13a/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc >>>> >>>> >>>> The number of lines hasn't changed much, but the size of the >>>> event loop, the most complicated part of the program, has been >>>> reduced by switching from TCP to SCTP. Thanks in advance. >>> >>> Iirc, you require a user to "register" by sending you an email with >>> their password in the clear? >> >> I plan to use Wireguard for encryption so it >> could be done after we have that set up. > > You don't understand how passwords work do you? You should NEVER be > storing user's passwords whether they are encrypted or not on your > servers: you should be HASHING the user password on the user's machine > and sending that over an encrypted link. Indeed. Even a nice DH exchange might be in order... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman_key_exchange > > /Flibble >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2020-02-28 15:37 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <r3c87k$b0o$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #72048 |
On 2/27/2020 8:19 PM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, February 9, 2020 at 2:54:28 PM UTC-6, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 10/30/2019 9:58 AM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>> Shalom >>> >>> Can you give me some suggestions on how to improve my >>> repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards >>> ? >>> >>> What do you think of recent changes to this file? >>> https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/master/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc >>> >>> and a version from the end of September: >>> https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards/blob/9bc4c2646e7dc6421dfdcd9d1107d544c320a13a/src/cmw/tiers/cmwA.cc >>> >>> The number of lines hasn't changed much, but the size of the >>> event loop, the most complicated part of the program, has been >>> reduced by switching from TCP to SCTP. Thanks in advance. >> >> Iirc, you require a user to "register" by sending you an email with >> their password in the clear? > > I plan to use Wireguard for encryption so it > could be done after we have that set up. How are you storing those user passwords on your end? I hope your not storing them in the clear... You can store the HMAC'ed result, keyed with a salt or some random element. Then instead of comparing passwords in the clear, you can compare hash digests.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web