Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #69492 > unrolled thread
| Started by | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-10-30 09:58 -0700 |
| Last post | 2020-08-04 18:28 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 87 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-10-30 09:58 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-10-30 18:16 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-10-30 18:27 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-10-30 22:13 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-10-30 22:36 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-10-31 20:35 +1300
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-10-31 10:28 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-01 08:24 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com> - 2019-11-01 17:20 -0400
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2019-11-02 12:43 +1300
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2019-11-01 17:47 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-01 19:07 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-02 16:33 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 10:46 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-02 10:21 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 10:26 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-02 17:43 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-02 18:52 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 11:11 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-02 20:16 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com> - 2019-11-02 16:59 -0400
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-02 21:23 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 17:49 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 17:14 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-03 01:15 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2019-11-03 03:51 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2021-03-09 20:24 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-03 11:35 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-03 20:04 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2019-11-04 08:07 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-04 09:08 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-07 08:17 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-11-07 16:52 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-07 10:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2019-11-07 21:33 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-09 16:28 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-11 22:33 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2019-11-12 08:26 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-12 15:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-01-31 21:59 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2020-12-03 09:40 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2020-12-03 09:40 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2021-01-18 20:48 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2019-11-04 01:00 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-11-03 05:20 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-03 11:12 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-04 00:30 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-11-04 11:03 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-11 23:38 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-11 23:39 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2019-11-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-11-02 20:37 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-02-08 19:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2020-02-09 19:52 +1300
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-09 12:54 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-02-27 20:19 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-02-28 16:50 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 15:34 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 15:37 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-02-28 16:24 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-02-29 03:48 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 21:33 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-02-29 06:28 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 22:34 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-02-29 06:51 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2020-02-29 07:34 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 23:40 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-01 14:46 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-01 12:59 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-01 22:47 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2020-03-01 22:14 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-03-03 08:06 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-02 13:21 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-02 13:24 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-03-03 08:11 +0100
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-03 01:31 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-03-03 01:33 -0800
exception with distinct data members and concatenated what "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 08:24 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-12-08 10:26 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2020-12-08 11:00 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2020-12-08 13:17 -0800
Re: exception with distinct data members and concatenated what Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2020-12-08 22:13 +0200
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 23:38 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2020-02-29 06:50 +0000
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2020-02-28 23:32 -0800
Re: Regal eagle / American cloud woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2020-08-04 18:28 -0700
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | Real Troll <Real.Troll@Trolls.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 16:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <qpkqr6$5bj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #69513 |
On 02/11/2019 19:16, David Brown wrote: > > I have never seen anyone express any interest in your work - > Frankly this is completely ridiculous. In C newsgroup, people are discussing about c compilers that most people aren't interested in yet that is allowed without any complaints. There are 100s of C compilers and there is no point in creating yet another one but it is their prerogative to waste their own time and discuss it here on these newsgroup. The OP should just continue posting his links (and show two fingers to whoever complaints about them) and if people don't like it then they can either stop visiting these newsgroups or simply kill-file someone whose postings they dislike or hate!! My posts are kill-filed by almost everybody on this planet but who fuck cares about them. I for one is not going to to anything like this and keep plodding and supporting whoever wants to post anything here including politics, sex, porn or whatever. These newsgroups have never discussed anything useful for the past 10 years. Now everybody go and fuck yourself. Real Troll has spoken.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 21:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <UsmvF.3695$XR5.1325@fx16.fr7> |
| In reply to | #69516 |
On 02/11/2019 20:59, Real Troll wrote: > On 02/11/2019 19:16, David Brown wrote: >> >> I have never seen anyone express any interest in your work - >> > > Frankly this is completely ridiculous. In C newsgroup, people are > discussing about c compilers that most people aren't interested in yet > that is allowed without any complaints. There are 100s of C compilers and > there is no point in creating yet another one but it is their prerogative > to waste their own time and discuss it here on these newsgroup. > > The OP should just continue posting his links (and show two fingers to > whoever complaints about them) and if people don't like it then they can > either stop visiting these newsgroups or simply kill-file someone whose > postings they dislike or hate!! My posts are kill-filed by almost > everybody on this planet but who fuck cares about them. > > I for one is not going to to anything like this and keep plodding and > supporting whoever wants to post anything here including politics, sex, > porn or whatever. These newsgroups have never discussed anything useful > for the past 10 years. > > Now everybody go and fuck yourself. Real Troll has spoken. That's nice, dear. /Flibble -- "Snakes didn't evolve, instead talking snakes with legs changed into snakes." - Rick C. Hodgin “You won’t burn in hell. But be nice anyway.” – Ricky Gervais “I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn’t believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens.” – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 17:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <24834083-3c67-483c-84fd-d952e7b3f7a9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69516 |
On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 4:01:41 PM UTC-5, Real Troll wrote: > > These newsgroups have never discussed anything useful > for the past 10 years. > This group has been helpful to me for years now. Some may not like the way things are going, e.g. SaaS, but that's not my fault. Honk if you love SaaS. Brian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 17:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <85640c9c-c8f1-46c9-9962-560cc1886c08@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69513 |
On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: I find most of your replies to be spam. Brian Ebenezer Enterprises
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-03 01:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pSpvF.6207$ns7.5534@fx06.fr7> |
| In reply to | #69520 |
On 03/11/2019 00:14, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 2:16:59 PM UTC-5, David Brown wrote: > > > I find most of your replies to be spam. Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? Cockwomble. /Flibble -- "Snakes didn't evolve, instead talking snakes with legs changed into snakes." - Rick C. Hodgin “You won’t burn in hell. But be nice anyway.” – Ricky Gervais “I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn’t believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens.” – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-02 19:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6f6cbb21-a4bd-4be2-a27b-f64c48dd874a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69522 |
On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: > > Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? > Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." In order for communism to not die even more quickly than it otherwise would, you trolls actually need a quality basis for your pogroms. Let's see, what quality products/companies have come from communism? Oh, none? Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - "They stab it with their steely knives, but they just can't kill the beast." https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards "it" in this context is capitalism, free markets, free speech...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-03 03:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <19svF.19998$AI7.4562@fx12.fr7> |
| In reply to | #69523 |
On 03/11/2019 02:01, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: >> >> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? >> > > Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." > In order for communism to not die even more quickly than > it otherwise would, you trolls actually need a quality > basis for your pogroms. Let's see, what quality > products/companies have come from communism? Oh, none? Who mentioned communism? Pathetic attempt at misdirection, Brian. This "Ben Shapiro" guy is just as much of a religious bigot as you are, Brian, but of course you know this already which is why you keep spamming him here. Cockwomble. /Flibble -- "Snakes didn't evolve, instead talking snakes with legs changed into snakes." - Rick C. Hodgin “You won’t burn in hell. But be nice anyway.” – Ricky Gervais “I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn’t believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens.” – Ricky Gervais "Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?" "I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied. "How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil." "Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Wood <woodbrian77@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-03-09 20:24 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d24573fd-d125-4fa9-816d-43ac4670f5a5n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69524 |
On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 10:51:40 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: > On 03/11/2019 02:01, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: > >> > >> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? > >> > > > > Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." > > In order for communism to not die even more quickly than > > it otherwise would, you trolls actually need a quality > > basis for your pogroms. Let's see, what quality > > products/companies have come from communism? Oh, none? > Who mentioned communism? Pathetic attempt at misdirection, Brian. > > This "Ben Shapiro" guy is just as much of a religious bigot as you are, > Brian, but of course you know this already which is why you keep spamming > him here. Cockwomble. > /Flibble > Today he said something like: Once the woke mob starts coming for you, they don't stop. That reminds me of this quote that I've used here before: "They stab it with their steely knives, but they just can't kill the beast." Yesterday he recommended people use duckduckgo.com. I've had a link to them on my website for years! I would be remiss if I didn't ask for ideas on how to improve my repo: https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards Brian Ebenezer Enterprises https://webEbenezer.net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-03 11:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpmai0$921$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69523 |
On 03/11/2019 03:01, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: >> >> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? >> > > Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." For those that don't know who Shapiro is, but (for some reason) want to know, here is an introduction. <https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro> I love the description of him as a "professional idiot". Now, people can have whatever view they like on politics - this is not a political group. And it is not an American group, and most certainly not an American political group. People don't get to have the same breadth of views on bigotry and prejudice. But while I will condemn prejudice whenever I see it, it is also off-topic for the group. What is more relevant is does this Shapiro guy have the slightest relevance to C++? Is anything he says remotely connected to the language, or its use? The answer, of course, is no. Anything Shapiro says is of no more interest here than the wisdom of Kermit the Frog. > In order for communism to not die even more quickly than > it otherwise would, you trolls actually need a quality > basis for your pogroms. Let's see, what quality > products/companies have come from communism? Oh, none? Again, politics has nothing to do with anything under discussion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-03 20:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <6212b6ed-8d39-428b-8054-97388cb3be2b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69529 |
On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 4:35:56 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > On 03/11/2019 03:01, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > > On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: > >> > >> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? > >> > > > > Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." > > For those that don't know who Shapiro is, but (for some reason) want to > know, here is an introduction. > > <https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro> > He is from Los Angeles, California. He went to Harvard Law School and practiced law for a short time, but then became a journalist. He's a very knowledgeable and down- to-earth person. He's an Orthodox Jew. He's married and has three children - one of them hasn't been born yet. His podcasts are super. I have this in a server: #ifdef __linux__ #include<linux/sctp.h> #else #include<netinet/sctp.h> #endif FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape so this is a drag. Brian https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-04 08:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpoinm$f03$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69535 |
Am 04.11.19 um 05:04 schrieb woodbrian77@gmail.com: > On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 4:35:56 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: >> On 03/11/2019 03:01, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: >>>> >>>> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." >> >> For those that don't know who Shapiro is, but (for some reason) want to >> know, here is an introduction. >> >> <https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro> >> > > He is from Los Angeles, California. He went to Harvard > Law School and practiced law for a short time, but then > became a journalist. He's a very knowledgeable and down- > to-earth person. He's an Orthodox Jew. He's married > and has three children - one of them hasn't been born yet. > His podcasts are super. That was an interesting read. Especially the first hits on Google where a Britisch conservative from the BBC interviews him with tough questions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VixqvOcK8E Funny when he said "You try to make quick buck at BBC off the fact that I'm popular and noone has ever heard of you!" > I have this in a server: > > #ifdef __linux__ > #include<linux/sctp.h> > #else > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > #endif > > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > so this is a drag. Use autoconf. AC_CHECK_HEADERS(linux/sctp.h netinet/sctp.h) Christian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-04 09:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qpom9a$d1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #69535 |
On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, November 3, 2019 at 4:35:56 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: >> On 03/11/2019 03:01, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Saturday, November 2, 2019 at 8:15:15 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote: >>>> >>>> Oh the irony. Do as I say, not as I do eh Brian? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, but as Ben Shapiro says, "capitalism always wins." >> >> For those that don't know who Shapiro is, but (for some reason) want to >> know, here is an introduction. >> >> <https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro> >> > > He is from Los Angeles, California. He went to Harvard > Law School and practiced law for a short time, but then > became a journalist. He's a very knowledgeable and down- > to-earth person. He's an Orthodox Jew. He's married > and has three children - one of them hasn't been born yet. > His podcasts are super. I understand that you like him (he shares many of your prejudices). You seem to think his opinion is important for C++. I can't imagine why. So unless you can reference his development work or writings on C++, let's leave him out of this. > > I have this in a server: > > #ifdef __linux__ > #include<linux/sctp.h> > #else > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > #endif > > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. Every platform that is not Linux? Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll get technical answers. > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > so this is a drag. > Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-07 08:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <927ffeea-268b-49b2-912b-5afcce043723@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69537 |
On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > > > > I have this in a server: > > > > #ifdef __linux__ > > #include<linux/sctp.h> > > #else > > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > > #endif > > > > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > > Every platform that is not Linux? > > Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the > second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it > is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new > thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll > get technical answers. > > > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > > so this is a drag. > > > > Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it > likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-07 16:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnqs8ivb.cdo.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| In reply to | #69624 |
On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >> > >> > I have this in a server: >> > >> > #ifdef __linux__ >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> >> > #else >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> >> > #endif >> > >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. >> >> Every platform that is not Linux? >> >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll >> get technical answers. >> >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape >> > so this is a drag. >> > >> >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. > > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-07 10:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <261a97b0-622a-4e07-a2f8-9a7a99fa81a4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69627 |
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > >> > > >> > I have this in a server: > >> > > >> > #ifdef __linux__ > >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> > >> > #else > >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > >> > #endif > >> > > >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > >> > >> Every platform that is not Linux? > >> > >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the > >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it > >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new > >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll > >> get technical answers. > >> > >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > >> > so this is a drag. > >> > > >> > >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it > >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. > > > > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and > > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. > > Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API > extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from > that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? > > I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention > which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. > Is there anything wrong with netinet/sctp.h? If not, I suggest that as the home.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-07 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnqs93dr.cdo.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
| In reply to | #69638 |
On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: >> On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >> > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: >> >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I have this in a server: >> >> > >> >> > #ifdef __linux__ >> >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> >> >> > #else >> >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> >> >> > #endif >> >> > >> >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. >> >> >> >> Every platform that is not Linux? >> >> >> >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the >> >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it >> >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new >> >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll >> >> get technical answers. >> >> >> >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape >> >> > so this is a drag. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it >> >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. >> > >> > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and >> > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. >> >> Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API >> extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from >> that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? >> >> I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention >> which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. >> > > Is there anything wrong with netinet/sctp.h? If not, I suggest > that as the home. It's analogous to netinet/tcp.h, udp.h and so on, so I guess that's the right place. And it's what the RFC uses in its examples (although it doesn't say anything about that being normative). /Jorgen -- // Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . . \X/ snipabacken.se> O o .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-09 16:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ed239a37-9c54-436a-b5c9-cf6a082d807b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69642 |
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 3:34:00 PM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-6, Jorgen Grahn wrote: > >> On Thu, 2019-11-07, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > >> > On Monday, November 4, 2019 at 2:08:22 AM UTC-6, David Brown wrote: > >> >> On 04/11/2019 05:04, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > I have this in a server: > >> >> > > >> >> > #ifdef __linux__ > >> >> > #include<linux/sctp.h> > >> >> > #else > >> >> > #include<netinet/sctp.h> > >> >> > #endif > >> >> > > >> >> > FreeBSD uses the else branch. I'm not sure what other platforms do. > >> >> > >> >> Every platform that is not Linux? > >> >> > >> >> Or do you mean, "I'm not sure what other platforms /should/ use the > >> >> second include choice" ? If so, then I can't help, I'm afraid. But it > >> >> is a concrete, technical question - and if you ask it again in a new > >> >> thread (without any spam, or hero worshipping), then hopefully you'll > >> >> get technical answers. > >> >> > >> >> > Any ideas on how to improve this? My server is in pretty good shape > >> >> > so this is a drag. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Are you running it on anything other than Linux and FreeBSD? Is it > >> >> likely to be used anywhere else? If not, then the code is fine. > >> > > >> > It should be portable to Posix systems. The ifdef is a wart and > >> > I'd like to have one line for that -- like I do for everything else. > >> > >> Then it's a matter about how well standardised the BSD Sockets API > >> extension for the SCTP protocol is. Should be possible to google from > >> that angle: e.g. what does POSIX, SUS, RFCs say? > >> > >> I see RFC 6458 covers the API ... except it doesn't seem to mention > >> which header files should exist, which is a disappointment. > >> > > > > Is there anything wrong with netinet/sctp.h? If not, I suggest > > that as the home. > > It's analogous to netinet/tcp.h, udp.h and so on, so I guess that's > the right place. And it's what the RFC uses in its examples (although > it doesn't say anything about that being normative). > I wonder what steps to take to get something done. I'd like to think that it wouldn't take years. Brian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-11 22:33 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8e71b531-5851-479a-a3d0-8a421e6a7d1e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69692 |
I installed gcc10 on a FreeBSD 12.1 machine. That machine also has gcc9.2 on it. When I try to use g++10, I get an error that it cannot execute 'cc1plus' execvp: No such file or directory . I found a cc1plus file under a gcc9 directory, but that's the only version I found under /usr/local. I want to use span so am trying to get g++10. The only idea I have is to do something like pkg remove gcc9 but kind of doubt that would help. I have a version of clang on the machine that I can use, but just thought I'd see if I could get gcc10 to work. Any ideas? Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | woodbrian77@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-12 08:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c1c97beb-d3c0-4875-b15c-37a875dfe3a7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #69713 |
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 12:33:56 AM UTC-6, woodb...@gmail.com wrote: > I installed gcc10 on a FreeBSD 12.1 machine. That machine also has > gcc9.2 on it. When I try to use g++10, I get an error that > it cannot execute 'cc1plus' execvp: No such file or directory > > . I found a cc1plus file under a gcc9 directory, but that's > the only version I found under /usr/local. I want to use span > so am trying to get g++10. The only idea I have is to do something > like > pkg remove gcc9 > > but kind of doubt that would help. > I have a version of clang on the machine that I can use, but just > thought I'd see if I could get gcc10 to work. Any ideas? Thanks. I got it working by using the span header from gcc10 with gcc9.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-11-12 15:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <lnftis3b1w.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
| In reply to | #69713 |
woodbrian77@gmail.com writes:
> I installed gcc10 on a FreeBSD 12.1 machine. That machine also has
> gcc9.2 on it. When I try to use g++10, I get an error that
> it cannot execute 'cc1plus' execvp: No such file or directory
How did you install gcc10?
I'm not very familiar with FreeBSD, but on some systems "gcc" and "g++"
are separate packages. cc1plus is the C++ frontend, invoked by the g++
command. It's typically installed under a "libexec" directory, so g++
can find it but it's not in your $PATH. If you installed gcc-10 with
support for C but not for C++, that could explain what you saw -- except
that the "g++10" command itself probably shouldn't have been visible.
This might be a better question for a Unix or FreeBSD forum.
[...]
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web