Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #44630 > unrolled thread

This will work or not?

Started byMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
First post2016-08-31 14:59 +0200
Last post2016-09-05 21:25 +0100
Articles 20 on this page of 123 — 25 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++


Contents

  This will work or not? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 14:59 +0200
    Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-31 15:20 +0200
      Re: This will work or not? mark <mark@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-31 16:05 +0200
        Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-31 16:19 +0200
      Re: This will work or not? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-08-31 14:20 +0000
      Re: This will work or not? Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> - 2016-08-31 18:53 +0200
        Re: This will work or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-09-01 09:03 -0700
          Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-01 22:45 +0200
            Re: This will work or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-09-01 18:08 -0700
              Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 09:24 +0200
                Re: This will work or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-09-04 06:31 -0700
                  Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-04 20:19 +0200
    Re: This will work or not? Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2016-08-31 15:45 +0200
      Re: This will work or not? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-31 15:59 +0200
      Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-31 16:22 +0200
        Re: This will work or not? Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2016-08-31 17:06 +0200
          Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-08-31 19:29 +0200
            Re: This will work or not? Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2016-08-31 21:52 +0100
              Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-01 09:07 +0200
                Re: This will work or not? Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2016-09-01 12:30 +0100
              Re: This will work or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-09-01 09:01 -0700
                Re: This will work or not? Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2016-09-01 18:16 +0100
                  Re: This will work or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-09-01 18:37 -0700
                    Re: This will work or not? Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2016-09-02 10:42 +0100
                      Re: This will work or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2016-09-04 06:59 -0700
            Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-08-31 23:17 -0400
              Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-01 09:35 +0200
                Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 15:34 -0400
                  Re: This will work or not? me <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 13:50 -0700
                    Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 21:01 -0400
                      Re: This will work or not? me <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 19:02 -0700
                        Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 22:17 -0400
                          Re: This will work or not? me <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 08:19 -0700
                            Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-02 12:39 -0400
                              Re: This will work or not? me <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 12:26 -0700
                                Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-02 16:38 -0400
                                  Re: This will work or not? me <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 13:51 -0700
                                    Re: This will work or not? me <crisdunbar@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 14:16 -0700
                                    Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-02 19:58 -0400
                                Re: This will work or not? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-09-02 23:56 +0300
                                  Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-03 17:58 +0200
                        Re: This will work or not? Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2016-09-02 11:41 +0200
                          Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 12:27 +0200
                            Re: This will work or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-02 12:37 +0100
                              Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 17:39 +0200
                                Re: This will work or not? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-02 17:40 +0200
                                Re: This will work or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-02 16:54 +0100
                                  Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 20:22 +0200
                            Re: This will work or not? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2016-09-02 08:04 -0400
                              Re: This will work or not? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-09-02 13:51 +0100
                                Re: This will work or not? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2016-09-02 21:48 -0400
                            Re: This will work or not? Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2016-09-02 15:17 +0200
                              Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 17:46 +0200
                  Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-01 23:14 +0200
                    Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-01 21:02 -0400
                      Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 09:35 +0200
                        Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-02 08:50 -0400
                          Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 17:59 +0200
                            Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-02 12:49 -0400
                              Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-02 20:36 +0200
                                Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-02 16:32 -0400
                                  Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-03 18:08 +0200
                                    Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 18:25 -0400
                                      Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-03 23:51 +0100
                                        Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 21:48 -0400
                                          Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 03:48 +0100
                                            Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 23:05 -0400
                                              Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 05:02 +0100
                                                Re: This will work or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-09-04 10:57 +0100
                                                  Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 09:40 -0400
                                                    Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 16:39 +0100
                                                      Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 12:46 -0400
                                                        Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 17:51 +0100
                                                          Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 13:07 -0400
                                                            Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 18:37 +0100
                                                              Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 17:16 -0400
                                                                Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 22:23 +0100
                                                                  Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 18:54 -0400
                                                        Re: This will work or not? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 09:58 -0700
                                                          Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 13:08 -0400
                                                            Re: This will work or not? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 10:21 -0700
                                                              Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 17:18 -0400
                                                                Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 22:24 +0100
                                                                  Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 18:56 -0400
                                                                    Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-05 00:27 +0100
                                                                      Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 22:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-05 18:18 +0100
                                                                          Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-05 15:27 -0400
                                                                            Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-05 20:32 +0100
                                                                              Re: This will work or not? woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-09-05 14:07 -0700
                                                                              Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-05 18:15 -0400
                                                                            Re: This will work or not? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2016-09-05 20:12 +0000
                                                                              Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-05 22:05 +0100
                                                                              Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-05 18:16 -0400
                                                                                Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-06 08:47 +0200
                                                                                  Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-06 09:12 -0400
                                                                                    Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-06 16:31 +0200
                                                                                      Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-06 11:20 -0400
                                                                  Re: This will work or not? bighe.trole@gmail.com - 2016-09-04 18:55 -0700
                                                                    Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 22:55 -0400
                                                                Re: This will work or not? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 17:17 -0700
                                                                  Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 22:57 -0400
                                                                    Re: This will work or not? "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-05 11:20 -0700
                                                      Re: This will work or not? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-09-04 18:54 +0200
                                                        Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 17:59 +0100
                                                        Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 13:08 -0400
                                                        Re: This will work or not? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-09-04 20:25 +0200
                                                          Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 17:20 -0400
                                              Re: This will work or not? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-09-04 02:36 -0700
                                                Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-04 09:41 -0400
                                        Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 21:49 -0400
                                          Re: This will work or not? Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2016-09-04 03:49 +0100
                                            Re: This will work or not? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-09-03 23:06 -0400
                                              Re: This will work or not? woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-09-03 21:16 -0700
    Re: This will work or not? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2016-08-31 21:08 +0100
    Re: This will work or not? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 02:28 +0200
      Re: This will work or not? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-09-01 01:28 -0700
      Re: This will work or not? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-02 12:06 -0700
    Re: This will work or not? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-09-05 02:21 -0700
      Re: This will work or not? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-05 13:38 +0200
    Re: This will work or not? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2016-09-05 11:34 +0000
      Re: This will work or not? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-05 13:36 +0200
        Re: This will work or not? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2016-09-05 21:25 +0100

Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →


#44830

From"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com>
Date2016-09-04 10:21 -0700
Message-ID<d9c108d6-1014-49f6-a319-3d4c81d6af24@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#44828
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of learning.

That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.

> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.

I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.

Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44838

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-04 17:18 -0400
Message-ID<nqi340$1li$2@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44830
On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of learning.
> 
> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>

Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time, it's
no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.

>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
> 
> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
> 
> Best regards,
> Rick C. Hodgin
> 

You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
people here, as you have already been told.

Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and when
they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
one of them.

I would suggest you consider that thought.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44842

FromMr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>
Date2016-09-04 22:24 +0100
Message-ID<FMedneuWy6a9DFHKnZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#44838
On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of learning.
>>
>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>
>
> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time, it's
> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>
>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>
>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>
>
> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
> people here, as you have already been told.
>
> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and when
> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
> one of them.
>
> I would suggest you consider that thought.

So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle? 
That explains quite a lot.

/Flibble

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44844

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-04 18:56 -0400
Message-ID<nqi8pv$ktn$2@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44842
On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>> learning.
>>>
>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>
>>
>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time, it's
>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>
>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>
>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>
>>
>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>
>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and when
>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
>> one of them.
>>
>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
> 
> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle?
> That explains quite a lot.
> 
> /Flibble
> 
> 

Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just showing
how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it applies
to you or not.

Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44845

FromMr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>
Date2016-09-05 00:27 +0100
Message-ID<ZaidnVSg2YxDMFHKnZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#44844
On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>> learning.
>>>>
>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time, it's
>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>
>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>
>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>
>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and when
>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
>>> one of them.
>>>
>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>
>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle?
>> That explains quite a lot.
>>
>> /Flibble
>>
>>
>
> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just showing
> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it applies
> to you or not.

Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.

>
> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.

Take your own advice.

/Flibble

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44850

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-04 22:53 -0400
Message-ID<nqimne$llq$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44845
On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>> it's
>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>
>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>
>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>> when
>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
>>>> one of them.
>>>>
>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>
>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle?
>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>
>>> /Flibble
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just showing
>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it applies
>> to you or not.
> 
> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>

Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.

>>
>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
> 
> Take your own advice.
> 
> /Flibble
> 
> 

Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
 Your obsession is not at all healthy.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44865

FromMr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>
Date2016-09-05 18:18 +0100
Message-ID<OKKdneNVdJBXNVDKnZ2dnUU7-N_NnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#44850
On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>> it's
>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>
>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>> when
>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>
>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle?
>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>
>>>> /Flibble
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just showing
>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it applies
>>> to you or not.
>>
>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>>
>
> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>
>>>
>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>
>> Take your own advice.
>>
>> /Flibble
>>
>>
>
> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.

You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google 
it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.

/Flibble

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44870

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-05 15:27 -0400
Message-ID<nqkgue$mei$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44865
On 9/5/2016 1:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>>> when
>>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not
>>>>>> welcome is
>>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you
>>>>> Stuckle?
>>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just
>>>> showing
>>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it
>>>> applies
>>>> to you or not.
>>>
>>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
>> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>>
>>> Take your own advice.
>>>
>>> /Flibble
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
> 
> You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google
> it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.
> 
> /Flibble
> 
> 

Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the heklp most are the
ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
 Your obsession is not at all healthy.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44871

FromMr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>
Date2016-09-05 20:32 +0100
Message-ID<u-mdnRZ6r96sVVDKnZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#44870
On 05/09/2016 20:27, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/5/2016 1:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not
>>>>>>> welcome is
>>>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you
>>>>>> Stuckle?
>>>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just
>>>>> showing
>>>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it
>>>>> applies
>>>>> to you or not.
>>>>
>>>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
>>> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice.
>>>>
>>>> /Flibble
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
>>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>>
>> You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google
>> it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.
>>
>> /Flibble
>>
>>
>
> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the heklp most are the
> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.

Welcome to my killfile you demented fuckwit.

/Flibble

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44880

Fromwoodbrian77@gmail.com
Date2016-09-05 14:07 -0700
Message-ID<36b10800-d5cf-4417-ac69-a4520eb4328c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#44871
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:32:17 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:

Oy vey, Leigh.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44885

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-05 18:15 -0400
Message-ID<nqkqq3$qot$2@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44871
On 9/5/2016 3:32 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 20:27, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/5/2016 1:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>> On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is
>>>>>>>>>> incapable of
>>>>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon
>>>>>>>>> your own
>>>>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow
>>>>>>>>> Him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not
>>>>>>>> welcome is
>>>>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you
>>>>>>> Stuckle?
>>>>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just
>>>>>> showing
>>>>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it
>>>>>> applies
>>>>>> to you or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented
>>>>> fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
>>>> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
>>>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help
>>>> soon.
>>>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>>>
>>> You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google
>>> it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.
>>>
>>> /Flibble
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the heklp most are the
>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
> 
> Welcome to my killfile you demented fuckwit.
> 
> /Flibble
> 
> 

Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
Your obsession is not at all healthy.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44874

FromIke Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org>
Date2016-09-05 20:12 +0000
Message-ID<slrn3vfsnsrkch.2i9.ike@iceland.freeshell.org>
In reply to#44870
On 2016-09-05, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
> On 9/5/2016 1:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not
>>>>>>> welcome is
>>>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you
>>>>>> Stuckle?
>>>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just
>>>>> showing
>>>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it
>>>>> applies
>>>>> to you or not.
>>>>
>>>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
>>> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice.
>>>>
>>>> /Flibble
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
>>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>> 
>> You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google
>> it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.
>> 
>> /Flibble
>> 
>> 
>
> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the heklp most are the
> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>
 
What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44879

FromMr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk>
Date2016-09-05 22:05 +0100
Message-ID<78CdnRzp8pulQ1DKnZ2dnUU7-c-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#44874
On 05/09/2016 21:12, Ike Naar wrote:
> On 2016-09-05, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 9/5/2016 1:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>> On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not
>>>>>>>> welcome is
>>>>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you
>>>>>>> Stuckle?
>>>>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just
>>>>>> showing
>>>>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it
>>>>>> applies
>>>>>> to you or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
>>>> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
>>>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>>>
>>> You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google
>>> it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.
>>>
>>> /Flibble
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the heklp most are the
>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>>
>
> What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
> and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?

If I was obsessed with Stuckle he wouldn't now be in my killfile.

/Flibble

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44886

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-05 18:16 -0400
Message-ID<nqkqrp$qot$3@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44874
On 9/5/2016 4:12 PM, Ike Naar wrote:
> On 2016-09-05, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 9/5/2016 1:18 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>> On 05/09/2016 03:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 9/4/2016 7:27 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>> On 04/09/2016 23:56, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 5:24 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of
>>>>>>>>>> learning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>>>>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>>>>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time,
>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>>>>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for
>>>>>>>>> scrutiny.
>>>>>>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>>>>>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>>>>>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not
>>>>>>>> welcome is
>>>>>>>> one of them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you
>>>>>>> Stuckle?
>>>>>>> That explains quite a lot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, once again your obsession shows its ugly face.  You are just
>>>>>> showing
>>>>>> how bad it is - having to reply to every post I make, whether it
>>>>>> applies
>>>>>> to you or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whether it applies to me or not? Try scrolling up you demented fuckwit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it applies to you.  You are the one who can't resist replying to
>>>> anything I say - even though it has nothing to do with you.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do yourself and everyone else a favor.  Get help, and quick.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Flibble
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the help most are the
>>>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>>>
>>> You've been trolling the same way for at least the past decade (Google
>>> it) so I'm afraid it just doesn't wash mate.
>>>
>>> /Flibble
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you really need help.  But those who need the heklp most are the
>> ones who resist it the most.  Please - for your own sake, get help soon.
>>  Your obsession is not at all healthy.
>>
>  
> What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
> and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?
> 

It's simple.  I reply to him when he is writing to me.  He replies to me
even when I am discussing something with someone else.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44896

FromDavid Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Date2016-09-06 08:47 +0200
Message-ID<nqlopg$2rb$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#44886
On 06/09/16 00:16, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/5/2016 4:12 PM, Ike Naar wrote:

>> What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
>> and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?
>>
> 
> It's simple.  I reply to him when he is writing to me.  He replies to me
> even when I am discussing something with someone else.
> 

You don't actually know how Usenet groups work, do you?  I'll give you a
hint - it is not a dialogue.

But the difference here is that Mr Flibble keeps replying to Jerry,
because he finds Jerry madly irritating.  Jerry keeps replying because
he is a troll - a solid proportion of his Usenet posts have no purpose
other than to annoy people (with most of the rest being to deny his
previous mistakes).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44898

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-06 09:12 -0400
Message-ID<nqmfbe$e9i$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44896
On 9/6/2016 2:47 AM, David Brown wrote:
> On 06/09/16 00:16, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/5/2016 4:12 PM, Ike Naar wrote:
> 
>>> What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
>>> and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?
>>>
>>
>> It's simple.  I reply to him when he is writing to me.  He replies to me
>> even when I am discussing something with someone else.
>>
> 
> You don't actually know how Usenet groups work, do you?  I'll give you a
> hint - it is not a dialogue.
> 
> But the difference here is that Mr Flibble keeps replying to Jerry,
> because he finds Jerry madly irritating.  Jerry keeps replying because
> he is a troll - a solid proportion of his Usenet posts have no purpose
> other than to annoy people (with most of the rest being to deny his
> previous mistakes).
> 

David, I was on usenet since the start - and on email servers before the
first usenet servers got started.

Yes, it is a dialog - a dialog between at least two people, and often
multiple people.  It is seldom a monologue - except in a few people's cases.

And no, I'm not the one who goes around posting personal information
about people.  That's what trolls do.  And no, I don't post just to
annoy people.  I try to educate them on the language.  However, some,
like you, will not listen to other views; you just dismiss them because
they don't agree with your limited knowledge.

People like you aren't interested in learning.  You are only interested
in arguing.  That does not a good programmer make.

I'm here to help people who want to be helped.  But some like you only
want to argue.

And I call things like I see them.  When I see someone acting like an
arsehole, I tell them they are acting like an arsehole.  Does it make me
popular?  No - but I really don't give a damn what people like you think
of me, anyway.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44900

FromDavid Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Date2016-09-06 16:31 +0200
Message-ID<nqmk07$vjm$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#44898
On 06/09/16 15:12, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 9/6/2016 2:47 AM, David Brown wrote:
>> On 06/09/16 00:16, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 9/5/2016 4:12 PM, Ike Naar wrote:
>>
>>>> What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
>>>> and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's simple.  I reply to him when he is writing to me.  He replies to me
>>> even when I am discussing something with someone else.
>>>
>>
>> You don't actually know how Usenet groups work, do you?  I'll give you a
>> hint - it is not a dialogue.
>>
>> But the difference here is that Mr Flibble keeps replying to Jerry,
>> because he finds Jerry madly irritating.  Jerry keeps replying because
>> he is a troll - a solid proportion of his Usenet posts have no purpose
>> other than to annoy people (with most of the rest being to deny his
>> previous mistakes).
>>
> 
> David, I was on usenet since the start - and on email servers before the
> first usenet servers got started.
> 

I've heard those stories before.

> Yes, it is a dialog - a dialog between at least two people, and often
> multiple people.  It is seldom a monologue - except in a few people's cases.

My apologies - I had meant to say it is not a /duologue/, i.e., a
dialogue between only two people.  The point is that anyone here is free
to join in any threads.  You don't get to complain that Mr. Flibble
joins in during other discussions.

> 
> And no, I'm not the one who goes around posting personal information
> about people.  That's what trolls do.

I strongly disapprove of posting personal information about people.  I
have not done so, nor have I seen you doing so.  In Usenet, people are
the sum of their posts - it a poster wants people to know more about who
they are, then that poster should share the information.  Much as I
dislike you and the way you write, I think it is completely wrong for
people to post personal information about you (whether it be true or
completely fabricated - I don't know and don't care).

>  And no, I don't post just to
> annoy people.  I try to educate them on the language.

If that is really the case, then you are an abysmal failure.  You are
regularly seriously wrong about both C and C++, and show a total
inability to learn from anyone else - including the many language
experts in these groups.  And even if and when you are correct, you are
unable to express yourself in a way that would help anyone - a teacher
that insults his pupils is no teacher.

>  However, some,
> like you, will not listen to other views; you just dismiss them because
> they don't agree with your limited knowledge.

If you look at my posting history, you will see many times when I have
accepted being wrong, or thanked people for correcting me or giving me
new information.  I have had very little occasion to tell /you/ that I
have been wrong and you were right, simply because there have been very
few occasions when you /were/ right and I was wrong.

> 
> People like you aren't interested in learning.  You are only interested
> in arguing.  That does not a good programmer make.

No, I am interested in learning.  On the rare occasions when you say
something correct and interesting, I listen.  You usually spoil it by
getting carried away with a small and incorrect detail, which is a
shame.  I am still convinced that deep down you have some useful
knowledge and experience that you could share with people - it's just a
pity that you hide it beneath such a quantity of insults, arguments,
factual errors, and other noise.

> 
> I'm here to help people who want to be helped.  But some like you only
> want to argue.
> 
> And I call things like I see them.  When I see someone acting like an
> arsehole, I tell them they are acting like an arsehole.  Does it make me
> popular?  No - but I really don't give a damn what people like you think
> of me, anyway.
> 

Well, that final point certainly seems to be true.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44901

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-06 11:20 -0400
Message-ID<nqmmrq$aup$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44900
On 9/6/2016 10:31 AM, David Brown wrote:
> On 06/09/16 15:12, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 9/6/2016 2:47 AM, David Brown wrote:
>>> On 06/09/16 00:16, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 9/5/2016 4:12 PM, Ike Naar wrote:
>>>
>>>>> What's the difference between Flibble's obsession for you,
>>>>> and your obsession for Flibble? Why is one less healthy than the other?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's simple.  I reply to him when he is writing to me.  He replies to me
>>>> even when I am discussing something with someone else.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You don't actually know how Usenet groups work, do you?  I'll give you a
>>> hint - it is not a dialogue.
>>>
>>> But the difference here is that Mr Flibble keeps replying to Jerry,
>>> because he finds Jerry madly irritating.  Jerry keeps replying because
>>> he is a troll - a solid proportion of his Usenet posts have no purpose
>>> other than to annoy people (with most of the rest being to deny his
>>> previous mistakes).
>>>
>>
>> David, I was on usenet since the start - and on email servers before the
>> first usenet servers got started.
>>
> 
> I've heard those stories before.
>

And they are true.

>> Yes, it is a dialog - a dialog between at least two people, and often
>> multiple people.  It is seldom a monologue - except in a few people's cases.
> 
> My apologies - I had meant to say it is not a /duologue/, i.e., a
> dialogue between only two people.  The point is that anyone here is free
> to join in any threads.  You don't get to complain that Mr. Flibble
> joins in during other discussions.
> 

I never said it was anything different.  Don't put words in my mouth.

And you obviously didn't read what I said about Mr. Flibble, either.

>>
>> And no, I'm not the one who goes around posting personal information
>> about people.  That's what trolls do.
> 
> I strongly disapprove of posting personal information about people.  I
> have not done so, nor have I seen you doing so.  In Usenet, people are
> the sum of their posts - it a poster wants people to know more about who
> they are, then that poster should share the information.  Much as I
> dislike you and the way you write, I think it is completely wrong for
> people to post personal information about you (whether it be true or
> completely fabricated - I don't know and don't care).
> 

And it was something Flibbie did - but only someone totally obsessed
would go to all that trouble.

>>  And no, I don't post just to
>> annoy people.  I try to educate them on the language.
> 
> If that is really the case, then you are an abysmal failure.  You are
> regularly seriously wrong about both C and C++, and show a total
> inability to learn from anyone else - including the many language
> experts in these groups.  And even if and when you are correct, you are
> unable to express yourself in a way that would help anyone - a teacher
> that insults his pupils is no teacher.
> 

No, you just refuse to learn.  I have taught thousands of programmers on
three continents.  They are eager to learn.  And not one of them has
ever complained I taught them wrong.

I have also learned from hundreds of great programmers over the years.
They have taught me a huge amount, and I appreciate their teachings.

>>  However, some,
>> like you, will not listen to other views; you just dismiss them because
>> they don't agree with your limited knowledge.
> 
> If you look at my posting history, you will see many times when I have
> accepted being wrong, or thanked people for correcting me or giving me
> new information.  I have had very little occasion to tell /you/ that I
> have been wrong and you were right, simply because there have been very
> few occasions when you /were/ right and I was wrong.
> 

No, you only *think* you were right and I was wrong.  Determining the
endianness at compile time is a perfect example.  You said it could not
be done.  I showed you it could.  Rather than admit you were wrong, you
tried to change the rules.  It doesn't work.

Another example is your interpretation of the standards.  You are wrong
on several accounts, but will not admit it.  For instance, in the case
of struct layout, every time I show you a problem with your
interpretation, you say "I'm right if you don't do that".  You just will
not admit your interpretation is incorrect.

>>
>> People like you aren't interested in learning.  You are only interested
>> in arguing.  That does not a good programmer make.
> 
> No, I am interested in learning.  On the rare occasions when you say
> something correct and interesting, I listen.  You usually spoil it by
> getting carried away with a small and incorrect detail, which is a
> shame.  I am still convinced that deep down you have some useful
> knowledge and experience that you could share with people - it's just a
> pity that you hide it beneath such a quantity of insults, arguments,
> factual errors, and other noise.
> 

Your actions have proven otherwise.

>>
>> I'm here to help people who want to be helped.  But some like you only
>> want to argue.
>>
>> And I call things like I see them.  When I see someone acting like an
>> arsehole, I tell them they are acting like an arsehole.  Does it make me
>> popular?  No - but I really don't give a damn what people like you think
>> of me, anyway.
>>
> 
> Well, that final point certainly seems to be true.
> 
> 

Nope, I learned long ago that life is too short to worry about things
like that.  I worry about things that matter in my life.  And like it or
not, you don't.

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44847

Frombighe.trole@gmail.com
Date2016-09-04 18:55 -0700
Message-ID<2670bad9-db0c-4fb5-b4c6-ad67332fb276@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#44842
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 9:25:01 PM UTC, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> > On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> >> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> >>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of learning.
> >>
> >> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
> >> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
> >> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
> >>
> >
> > Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time, it's
> > no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
> >
> >>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
> >>
> >> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
> >> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
> >> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Rick C. Hodgin
> >>
> >
> > You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
> > people here, as you have already been told.
> >
> > Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and when
> > they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
> > driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
> > one of them.
> >
> > I would suggest you consider that thought.
> 
> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle? 
> That explains quite a lot.

Is it surprising that he would be a fan of a religion
that lets you beat your wife?

DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND

Case Information
Court System:   DISTRICT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY - CIVIL SYSTEM
Case Number:    0602SP019022003Claim Type: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
District/Location Codes:        06 / 02Filing Date:07/08/2003Case
Status:CLOSED
Complaint, Judgment, and Related Persons Information
(Each Complaint, Hearing, Judgment is listed separately, along with
each Related Person)
Complaint Information
Complaint No:   001(STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M) Vs:(STUCKLE, JERRY D )
Type:   REGULAR CLAIM
Status Date:    07/09/2003Filing Date:07/08/2003Amount$0.00Last
Activity
Date:07/14/2003
Related Person Information
Name:   STUCKLE, JERRY D
Connection to Complaint:        DEFENDANT
Address:        9920 BRIXTON LANE
City:   BETHESDAState:MDZip Code:20817-0000
Name:   STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M
Connection to Complaint:        PLAINTIFF

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44851

FromJerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
Date2016-09-04 22:55 -0400
Message-ID<nqimq4$llq$2@jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#44847
On 9/4/2016 9:55 PM, bighe.trole@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 9:25:01 PM UTC, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 04/09/2016 22:18, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 9/4/2016 1:21 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>>> Rick, I've tried to help Flibbie multiple times. He is incapable of learning.
>>>>
>>>> That is in no way true.  One's approach is often the impediment in
>>>> how able another is to learn.  You must meet all people wheee they
>>>> are.  And you must teach, not belittle or demean.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rick, I've tried many times with Flibbie and others.  After a time, it's
>>> no longer worth my effort.  I have better things to do in life.
>>>
>>>>> And I don't need any of your self-righteous preaching.
>>>>
>>>> I am not advocating me, but I am asking you to reflect upon your own
>>>> public actions, holding them yourself before Jesus Christ for scrutiny.
>>>> He will guide you and temper your responses ... if you'll allow Him.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Rick C. Hodgin
>>>>
>>>
>>> You are preaching, and your preaching is not wanted.  By me or other
>>> people here, as you have already been told.
>>>
>>> Real Christians know when religious discussions are appropriate and when
>>> they are not.  However, Satan is very insidious in his methods of
>>> driving people away from Christ.  Preaching where it is not welcome is
>>> one of them.
>>>
>>> I would suggest you consider that thought.
>>
>> So you believe in the existence a magical sky daddy too do you Stuckle? 
>> That explains quite a lot.
> 
> Is it surprising that he would be a fan of a religion
> that lets you beat your wife?
> 
> DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND
> 
> Case Information
> Court System:   DISTRICT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY - CIVIL SYSTEM
> Case Number:    0602SP019022003Claim Type: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> District/Location Codes:        06 / 02Filing Date:07/08/2003Case
> Status:CLOSED
> Complaint, Judgment, and Related Persons Information
> (Each Complaint, Hearing, Judgment is listed separately, along with
> each Related Person)
> Complaint Information
> Complaint No:   001(STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M) Vs:(STUCKLE, JERRY D )
> Type:   REGULAR CLAIM
> Status Date:    07/09/2003Filing Date:07/08/2003Amount$0.00Last
> Activity
> Date:07/14/2003
> Related Person Information
> Name:   STUCKLE, JERRY D
> Connection to Complaint:        DEFENDANT
> Address:        9920 BRIXTON LANE
> City:   BETHESDAState:MDZip Code:20817-0000
> Name:   STUCKLE, ELIZABETH M
> Connection to Complaint:        PLAINTIFF
> 

Try again.  Let's see you find a court record for that.  You can't,
because it's entirely made up.  We are still happily married.

Ah, but you couldn't find a link because one doesn't exist!  ROFLMAO!

-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 5 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++


csiph-web