Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #47578 > unrolled thread

My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ).

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-12-23 17:06 -0800
    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-24 11:00 +0200
      Re: while() and "Loop(3) { _Loop(4)..." aren't "impenetrable". Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-26 23:17 +0200
        Re: Refactoring is good, God's speed. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-27 01:17 +0200
          Re: Refactoring is good, God's speed. "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-12-26 15:26 -0800
          Re: PHP could use #define, seriously. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-27 10:01 +0200
          Re: Refactoring is good, God's speed. legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-12-28 18:10 +0000
            Re: Refactoring is good, God's speed. woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-28 10:20 -0800
        Re: Refactoring is good, God's speed. interval1066@gmail.com - 2016-12-30 10:43 -0800
          Re: Refactoring is good, God's speed. legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2017-01-02 00:44 +0000
            #define came from God himself, it's sacred. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-01 23:51 -0800
              #define came from God himself, it's sacred. Jeff-Relf.Me <@..yep> - 2017-01-02 08:00 +0000
                Re: #define came from God himself, it's sacred. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-03 03:58 +0000
                  I completely reWrote it, of course. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 00:46 -0800
                    I completely reWrote it, of course. Jeff-Relf.Me <@..sour> - 2017-01-03 08:51 +0000
                    Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-03 12:13 +0100
                      Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2017-01-03 12:28 +0100
                      Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-03 07:32 -0600
                        Ezekiel lives in your head RENT FREE!!  LOL!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-03 12:16 -0700
                        With "warnings as errors", turn off these warnings. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 13:00 -0800
                      Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-03 12:16 -0700
                        Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid> - 2017-01-03 12:30 -0800
                          If you're retarded then, yes, _Loop() is "undefined". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:06 -0800
                        Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-04 13:33 +0000
                          Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 07:45 -0600
                            Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-04 14:54 +0000
                              The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-04 10:17 -0800
                                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-04 19:19 +0100
                                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-05 03:34 +0000
                                  The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-04 22:26 -0800
                                    Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Anonymous <anonymous@invalid.tld> - 2017-01-05 08:18 +0000
                                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-05 09:24 +0100
                                      PostScript is my thing. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-05 01:08 -0800
                                    My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-07 03:56 -0800
                                      Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-01-07 13:09 +0100
                                      Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. jonkalb <google@kalbweb.com> - 2017-01-07 08:32 -0800
                                      Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-07 20:25 +0000
                                        Like a compiler that compiles itself, my Diff app diffs itself. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-07 17:53 -0800
                                        Re: My diffs now _perfectly match MicroSoft's WinMerge. Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2017-01-10 22:15 +0100
                                          Text file comparison is essential. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:23 -0800
                                            Nothing to compare, left and right, old and new. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:12 -0800
                                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-01-05 14:08 +0000
                                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-05 21:09 +0000
                                  Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2017-01-05 21:19 +0000
                                    "Functional" programming is "Tree Crawling". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-05 14:53 -0800
                                Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2017-01-05 17:43 -0600
                                  Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2017-01-10 12:02 -0800
                                    Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-01-10 20:13 +0000
                                    Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-01-10 20:34 +0000
                                    Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-10 21:21 +0000
                                      Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-10 22:48 +0100
                                        Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-12 21:40 +0000
                                    Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). red floyd <dont.bother@its.invalid> - 2017-01-10 13:46 -0800
                                    Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-11 17:41 +1300
                              Re: I completely reWrote it, of course. jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2017-01-05 14:08 +0000
                        What about you, GreyCloud ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 11:02 -0800
                          Re: What about you, GreyCloud ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-16 19:46 -0700
                            Health issues ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-16 20:39 -0800
                              Re: Health issues ? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-17 11:50 -0700
                                Negative Interest Rates. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:25 -0800
                                  Re: Negative Interest Rates. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-19 11:47 -0700
                                    Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 19:23 -0800
                                      Re: Negative Interest Rates "rips off" rich people, not the poor. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2017-01-20 16:17 -0700
                          Tons of people have reviewed the code, source and object. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:02 -0800
                          Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 04:17 -0800
                            Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-19 13:59 +0100
                              No one is here to learn at your feet, sorry. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 05:30 -0800
                              Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-19 07:37 -0600
                                Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 05:43 -0800
                              Re: Building a complex system can't be done when you're drunk and horny. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-01-20 04:32 +0000
                                Usenet isn't WikiPedia; here, it's all play and no work, anything goes. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-19 21:02 -0800
                    The "Least Longest" diffs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2017-01-03 03:04 -0800
                  Re: #define came from God himself, it's sacred. Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-03 21:27 +0000
        Re: LoopP( !isDigit( Ch ) ); jonkalb <google@kalbweb.com> - 2017-01-16 22:05 -0800
          Re: LoopP( !isDigit( Ch ) ); woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2017-01-17 11:17 -0800
            Re: LoopP( !isDigit( Ch ) ); David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-17 22:20 +0100
          Re: LoopP( !isDigit( Ch ) ); Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-17 18:18 -0300
            Re: LoopP( !isDigit( Ch ) ); Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2017-01-17 21:51 +0000
      Re: while() and "Loop(3) { _Loop(4)..." aren't "impenetrable". Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-12-26 13:24 -0800
        Re: "Standards" are like assholes, everyone's got one. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-12-26 14:27 -0800
          Re: _Underscores have never been -- and could never be -- a problem. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-27 13:25 +0200
            Re: Compiling C++ is trivial, always. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-27 21:38 +0200
              Re: Compiling C++ is trivial, always. Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2016-12-27 20:01 +0000
                Re: Compiling C++ is trivial, always. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-27 22:20 +0200
              Re: How big are your .CPP files ( in MegaBytes, not lines ) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2016-12-28 00:02 +0200
                Re: You could condense it down into fewer, larger, .CPP files. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 14:11 +1300
                  Re: What are you compiling, and how long does it take ? ! Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 15:34 +1300
                    Re: Are you Linus Torvalds ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 16:14 +1300
                      Re: The _Default "Subject:" line is neither mandatory or desirable. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 17:35 +1300
                        Re: Would a hardware/software upgrade help ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 08:09 +1300
                        Re: The _Default "Subject:" line is neither mandatory or desirable. legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2016-12-28 20:01 +0000
            Re: I don't create .h files, not a one. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2017-01-16 19:03 +0000
          Re: _Underscores have never been -- and could never be -- a problem. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-12-27 05:58 -0800
            Re: _Loop() works fine; I don't use "concurrent_vector.h". Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2016-12-27 22:14 +0000
            Re: _Loop() works fine; I don't use "concurrent_vector.h". Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2016-12-28 02:08 -0800
              Re: _Loop() works fine; I don't use "concurrent_vector.h". woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-28 09:45 -0800
        Re: "Standards" are like assholes, everyone's got one. Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-27 12:34 +1300
    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-12-24 10:40 +0100
      Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-26 17:41 -0800
        Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-27 15:28 +1300
    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). jonkalb <google@kalbweb.com> - 2016-12-26 23:24 -0800
      Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 10:54 -0800
        Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 11:26 +1300
          Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 20:36 -0800
            Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-28 17:42 +1300
              Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 21:24 -0800
                Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-27 22:16 -0800
                Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-28 13:29 -0800
                  Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 10:46 +1300
                Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-30 09:55 +1300
                  Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-29 14:19 -0800
                    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-30 11:25 +1300
                      Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-29 21:59 -0800
                        Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-30 21:27 +1300
                          Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-30 09:51 -0800
                            Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2016-12-30 19:46 +0100
                    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-12-30 10:07 +0100
                    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2016-12-30 02:49 -0800
                      Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2016-12-30 03:17 -0800
                Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 10:08 +1300
                Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-28 12:41 -0800
                  Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2016-12-28 21:59 +0000
                    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-12-29 14:34 +0100
                      Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-29 10:27 -0800
                        Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-12-29 20:33 +0100
                    Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2016-12-28 15:14 -0800
                      Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-12-29 13:05 +1300
                Re: My C++ Coding Standards ( apologies to Bjarne Stroustrup ). Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2016-12-28 19:36 +0000

Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7  Next page →

#48169 — Nothing to compare, left and right, old and new.

You ( MrDFS ) asked me:
> > ScreenShot:  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/Diff.PNG
> > Help/Settings:  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/X.HTM
> 
> What are those green and red boxes/lines for?

They group lines of code together; red for old, green for new.

Fact is, most of my changes are a _huge blur of green and red;
nothing to compare, left and right, old and new.

Using the standard algorithm (WinMerge) didn't help.
Weak as it is, I use it to review changes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47842 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> You ( Scott Lurndal ) replied:
>> > > > He doesn't work for anybody needing code.
>> > > > That much is certain.  Otherwise, he'd have been fired.
>> > >
>> > > I dunno - I've seen similar code in shipping products:
>> > > For example (Product: ADSINP, language: BPL circa 1977):
>> >
>> > I suppose that there are some clueless managers
>> > who are "impressed" by impenetrable code.
>>
>> to be fair, in the 1970's, there were limits on pretty
>> much everything, including number of lines that a compiler could
>> handle in a reasonable amount of time given memory constraints.
>>
>> Compact (dense) code was more the rule
>> than the exception in those days.
>
> My C++ is dense, 236 columns wide, and I'm running:

Oh, goodfuckinggrief.  That's not the definition of dense code.
It's called human-unreadable code.  White space helps the
maintainer and gives one margins to scribble notes.

Now everything you wrote about this subject makes sense.

[embarassed emotiocn here for not thinking of his definition]

You are a newbie.

/BAH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47851 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On 04/01/2017 18:17, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> When I see sparse code, with lots of whitespace and comments,
> I _immediately know the programmer is struggling.

If whitespace is bad how come APL is unreadable?

Andy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47854 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> spake the secret code
<_JKdnVUjT6pyKPPFnZ2dnUU78b-dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> thusly:

>On 04/01/2017 18:17, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> When I see sparse code, with lots of whitespace and comments,
>> I _immediately know the programmer is struggling.
>
>If whitespace is bad how come APL is unreadable?

APL is unreadable in the sense that Chinese or Arabic is unreadable to
someone who only knows latin/european languages.  It uses unfamiliar
symbols and it reads right to left.  Sometimes Chinese is typeset top
to bottom and sometimes (particularly in modern text) it is typeset
left to right.  These things make it very foreign to a new reader, but
once oriented on the symbols (APL is much easier to grasp than Chinese
in this regard!) and the proper direction in which to read the code,
it's not that bad.

The bigger mind-twist for a conventional procedurally oriented thinker
is the switch to functional oriented thinking.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
            The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47859 — "Functional" programming is "Tree Crawling".

Speaking of Chinese, you ( Direct3D Richard ) wrote:
> The bigger mind-twist for a conventional procedurally oriented thinker
> is the switch to functional oriented thinking.

"Functional" programming is "Tree Crawling"; 
i.e. you spend all your time crawling on trees, like an ant.

Mostly, it's used in academia, not the market place.
When you see a lot of WhiteSpace and comments,
you know, _right _away, that there's a problem.

Dense PostScript ( .PDF ), on the other hand, is ubiquitous.
I use C++, instead of C, because it's basically C,
but with nice extras.  I've C++ code that generates .PDF files.

C++ also has paths/lines/arcs, like PostScript; to wit:

  ScreenShot: Jeff-Relf.Me/Chess.PNG

  ID2D1PathGeometry *Path ;  ID2D1GeometrySink *pSink ;

  r = Prev ? D/2 : W/2, x = MvX( From ), y = MvY( From ); 
  X = MvX( To ), Y = MvY( To ), dx = X - x, dy = Y - y ;
  Compass = atan2( dy, dx ); 

  Tangent = Pi/2 - asin( r/sqrt( dx*dx + dy*dy ) ); 
  Start = Compass + Tangent, End = Compass - Tangent ;
  Direct2D->CreatePathGeometry( &Path ); 

  Path->Open( &pSink ), pSink->SetFillMode( D2D1_FILL_MODE_WINDING );
  pSink->BeginFigure( Pnt( X, Y ), D2D1_FIGURE_BEGIN_FILLED );
  dx = r*cos( Start ), dy = r*sin( Start );
 
  pSink->AddLine( Pnt( x + dx, y + dy ) ), dx = r*cos( End ), dy = r*sin( End );

  D2D1_ARC_SEGMENT  Arc = { 
     { x + dx, y + dy }, { r, r }, 0, D2D1_SWEEP_DIRECTION_CLOCKWISE, 
     fmod( _360 + End - Start, _360 ) > Pi ? D2D1_ARC_SIZE_LARGE : D2D1_ARC_SIZE_SMALL };

  pSink->AddArc( Arc ); 
  pSink->EndFigure( D2D1_FIGURE_END_CLOSED ); 
  pSink->Close(), Trash( pSink );
  dxWin->SetTarget( WinSur ), dxWin->DrawGeometry( Path, C, LnW );
  dxWin->FillGeometry( Path, TransBlush );

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47860 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:17:59 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>When I see sparse code, with lots of whitespace and comments,
>I _immediately know the programmer is struggling.

No, you don't know that.  That's an expression of desperate bravado on
your part, not of experience or wisdom.

I've been programming for 45 years.  I've seen your code.  You're a
terrible programmer.

Why do I say so?

You play with language features like a tiny child randomly plugging
tinkertoy parts together, rather than using them as they were intended,
to construct useful, maintainable processes.

You're pretty smart, but apparently lack the confidence to do anything
that's both useful and complex.

Stop fucking around and try it.  You  might succeed.  What you're doing
now is deliberate, and elaborate and therefore obscure, failure.

-- 
Goat

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47910 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 5:43:34 PM UTC-6, Lofty Goat wrote:

Please don't swear here.


At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed

http://www.twincities.com/2017/01/10/at-this-minnesota-workplace-no-swearing-and-no-jerks-allowed/

“Ultimately, it’s about mutual respect.”


Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust.
http://webEbenezer.net

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47913 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

woodbrian77@gmail.com writes:

> At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed

This is not a workplace.  Also, please stop being a jerk.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47915 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

woodbrian77@gmail.com writes:
>On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 5:43:34 PM UTC-6, Lofty Goat wrote:
>
>Please don't swear here.
>
>
>At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed
>
>http://www.twincities.com/2017/01/10/at-this-minnesota-workplace-no-swearin=
>g-and-no-jerks-allowed/
>
>=E2=80=9CUltimately, it=E2=80=99s about mutual respect.=E2=80=9D

Don't be a jerk, Brian.  Mind your own business.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47919 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On 10/01/2017 20:02, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
> At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed

I thought in American a jerk (as in "jerk off") was pretty rude too... 
not so in English, where it's related to jolt.

Andy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47924 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On 10/01/17 22:21, Vir Campestris wrote:
> On 10/01/2017 20:02, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>> At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed
>
> I thought in American a jerk (as in "jerk off") was pretty rude too...
> not so in English, where it's related to jolt.
>

"jerk" is the same thing as "jolt" - it is the derivative of 
acceleration with time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47991 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On 10/01/2017 21:48, David Brown wrote:
> On 10/01/17 22:21, Vir Campestris wrote:
>> On 10/01/2017 20:02, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
>>> At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed
>>
>> I thought in American a jerk (as in "jerk off") was pretty rude too...
>> not so in English, where it's related to jolt.
>>
>
> "jerk" is the same thing as "jolt" - it is the derivative of
> acceleration with time.
>
Yes, but you learned English, not American...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47923 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On 1/10/2017 12:02 PM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 5:43:34 PM UTC-6, Lofty Goat wrote:
>
> Please don't swear here.
>
>
> At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed
>
> http://www.twincities.com/2017/01/10/at-this-minnesota-workplace-no-swearing-and-no-jerks-allowed/
>
> “Ultimately, it’s about mutual respect.”
>
>
Fuck off.  This isn't a "workplace".  Who died and made you God?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47930 — Re: The Longest Common Sequence ( NonContiguous ) algorithm ( recursive ).

On 01/11/17 09:02 AM, woodbrian77@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 5:43:34 PM UTC-6, Lofty Goat wrote:
>
> Please don't swear here.

Tit.

> At this Minnesota workplace, no swearing and no jerks allowed

So why are you here?

> “Ultimately, it’s about mutual respect.”

So where's your respect for the citizens of the countries you 
gratuitously insulted?

-- 
Ian

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#47843 — Re: I completely reWrote it, of course.

Scott Lurndal wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> writes:
>>Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>
>>> some POS that calls itself "GreyCloud" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>He doesn't work for anybody needing code.  That much is certain.
>>>>Otherwise, he'd have been fired.
>>>
>>>I dunno - I've seen similar code in shipping products:
>>>
>>>For example (Product: ADSINP, language: BPL circa 1977):
>>
>>I suppose that there are some clueless managers who are "impressed" by
>>impenetrable code.
>
> to be fair, in the 1970's, there were limits on pretty
> much everything, including number of lines that a compiler could
> handle in a reasonable amount of time given memory constraints.
>
> Compact (dense) code was more the rule than the exception in those
> days.

Another reason is having been on a firefight, fixing the installation's
code so it can run, then carrying back the changes and taking 2 months
to figure out why the new fixes worked.  However, the end result is
"if it ain't broke, don't fix it" so the impenetrable code stays
with lots of comments including "thar be dragons".

/BAH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#48094 — What about you, GreyCloud ?

Speaking of my code, you ( GreyCloud ) wrote:
> He doesn't work for anybody needing code.  
> That much is certain. Otherwise, he'd have been fired.

I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
What about you ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#48108 — Re: What about you, GreyCloud ?

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

> Speaking of my code, you ( GreyCloud ) wrote:
>> He doesn't work for anybody needing code.
>> That much is certain. Otherwise, he'd have been fired.
> 
> I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
> for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
> What about you ?

Retired.  And all of my cruise missiles work fine.

So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#48109 — Health issues ?

You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
> > I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
> > for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
> > What about you ?
> 
> Retired.  And all of my cruise missiles work fine.

I doubt it, sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
Likely, you have health issues.

> So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?

Yes, but it's _worse than that.
We're robots, programmed by Nature to play "The Stay Alive Game";
including: Breathing, Pissing, Shitting, Breeding, etc.

Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#48120 — Re: Health issues ?

Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

> You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
>> > I've been programming for "The Bankers" ( ABA.COM )
>> > for the last 24 years... they haven't fired me yet.
>> > What about you ?
>> 
>> Retired.  And all of my cruise missiles work fine.
> 
> I doubt it, sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
> Likely, you have health issues.

Nope, I was very expensive and the gov. offered me a retirement package I 
couldn't refuse.

> 
>> So, you work for the slave masters known as bankers, eh?
> 
> Yes, but it's _worse than that.
> We're robots, programmed by Nature to play "The Stay Alive Game";
> including: Breathing, Pissing, Shitting, Breeding, etc.
> 
> Pick the LeastWorst option, and hope for the LeastWorst luck.

Everyone in the world would be better off if Trump kicked the private bankers 
out of this country and go back to the original Bank of Congress... no interest 
on loans, the way it used to be.

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#48171 — Negative Interest Rates.

You ( GreyCloud ) replied ( to me ):
> > Sounds like you've been put out to pasture.
> > Likely, you have health issues.
> 
> Nope, I was very expensive and the gov. offered me 
> a retirement package I couldn't refuse.

I'm not "too expensive".

> Everyone in the world would be better off if Trump kicked the private bankers 
> out of this country and go back to the original Bank of Congress... 
> no interest on loans, the way it used to be.

Google "negative interest rates":
https://www.google.com/search?q=negative+interest+rates

It's real thing, but only in _highly developed countries.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++

csiph-web