Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7999 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-07-20 19:43 +0300 |
| Last post | 2011-07-25 05:11 -0700 |
| Articles | 7 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Kari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-20 19:43 +0300
Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-20 12:49 -0400
Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Virchanza <virtual@lavabit.com> - 2011-07-20 11:49 -0700
Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? TheGunslinger <mikiesrunsbaal.sec@sbcglobal.net> - 2011-07-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-23 16:17 +0200
Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-23 16:33 +0200
Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 05:11 -0700
| From | Kari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-20 19:43 +0300 |
| Subject | Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? |
| Message-ID | <v_mdnew10bQ4mLrTnZ2dnUVZ8mmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? -- Kari Laine PICs, Displays,Relays - USB-SPI-I2C http://www.byvac.com USB and FPGA boards http://www.ztex.de I am just a happy customer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOJwWkAAoJEPjW/Kjfref2LrwIAJd0wbGcqIz8asRlOlaDBA1L R+LqxKzyram9VUcsgUIgU8ILtTvUJcyYJhrPf3PHpEGOcLC8q6jwfM25rPeQ70za iQ4EcpEO0zAhBwio8uMAGZtZbgvJF6AOW2SRS0aLzlh69XI2jSdlRjY5upRxI4Ut 9yS9Bd8j+zq4T6vz29EWd4+WoeoXTHGGzm3uIYR9ZiuH6WHa4tEUtw+65MVnQx0m vDZ71awoQ/IRHbG3fHiEcvJcziVq/1KVAzQmxbxTL3uNZfeNPBXTFXBsBfvZvnZK K6YysBmZJkI/YCN6gQdUiU9G3EuMuCY1f7k38sDwpJjfYZh2qVAZ7Qj7sY+iZ/Y= =euvy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-20 12:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <j070uq$l9c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #7999 |
On 7/20/2011 12:43 PM, Kari Laine wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message > > Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Probably. And probably illegally. http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/big-picture.html#faq-6.13 V -- I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Virchanza <virtual@lavabit.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-20 11:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <18c228da-f212-493a-a9c6-575518d403a3@fq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #7999 |
On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat, wade out and click this link: http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | TheGunslinger <mikiesrunsbaal.sec@sbcglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-22 15:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <qusj275teunav41u2sg2lh5cei2oedg8at@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #8002 |
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT), Virchanza <virtual@lavabit.com> wrote: >On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? > > >If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat, wade >out and click this link: > >http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf There was a DRAFT of the new standard that was just ratified. I think this is the info you need to find a copy: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N 4411 2008-10-09 Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932; Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: lrajchel@ansi.org ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 Programming Languages Document Type: Text for CD Ballot Document Title: ISO/IEC 14882, Programming language – C++ Document Source: WG 21 Convener (P.J. Plauger) Document Status: This document is circulated to National Bodies for ballot. Please submit your vote via the online balloting system by the due date indicated. Action ID: Due Date: 2009-01-10 No. of Pages: 1314 IMHO, MJR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-23 16:17 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9903fuFkq4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8113 |
TheGunslinger wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT), Virchanza > <virtual@lavabit.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? >> >> >> If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat, >> wade out and click this link: >> >> http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf > > > There was a DRAFT of the new standard that was just ratified. > > I think this is the info you need to find a copy: > > ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N 4411 2008-10-09 > Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute, > 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932; > Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: lrajchel@ansi.org > ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 > Programming Languages > Document Type: Text for CD Ballot > Document Title: ISO/IEC 14882, Programming language - C++ > Document Source: WG 21 Convener (P.J. Plauger) > Document Status: This document is circulated to National Bodies for > ballot. Please submit > your vote via the online balloting system by the due date indicated. > Action ID: > Due Date: 2009-01-10 > No. of Pages: 1314 > That sounds like an on revision. The latest (and final) is dated 2011-04-11, and is NOT freely available. Bo Persson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-23 16:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <9904dqFri2U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #8128 |
Bo Persson wrote: > TheGunslinger wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT), Virchanza >> <virtual@lavabit.com> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? >>> >>> >>> If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat, >>> wade out and click this link: >>> >>> http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf >> >> >> There was a DRAFT of the new standard that was just ratified. >> >> I think this is the info you need to find a copy: >> >> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N 4411 2008-10-09 >> Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute, >> 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932; >> Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: lrajchel@ansi.org >> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 >> Programming Languages >> Document Type: Text for CD Ballot >> Document Title: ISO/IEC 14882, Programming language - C++ >> Document Source: WG 21 Convener (P.J. Plauger) >> Document Status: This document is circulated to National Bodies for >> ballot. Please submit >> your vote via the online balloting system by the due date >> indicated. Action ID: >> Due Date: 2009-01-10 >> No. of Pages: 1314 >> > > That sounds like an on revision. or "old" revision. > > The latest (and final) is dated 2011-04-11, and is NOT freely > available. > Bo Persson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-25 05:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <08263a45-3d31-4c68-b15e-eff02e13aafb@t9g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #7999 |
On 20 Jul., 18:43, Kari Laine wrote: > > Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Not legally. Occasionally, I use a very very early C++0x draft as close approximation to C++03. See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/ and look for N1804.pdf I havn't checked what all the changes are w.r.t. c++03. So far, I'm not aware of any significant change. There is no "long long", no additional keywords, no rvalue references, no lambdas, no additional standard headers. Cheers! SG
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web