Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7999 > unrolled thread

Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?

Started byKari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com>
First post2011-07-20 19:43 +0300
Last post2011-07-25 05:11 -0700
Articles 7 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++


Contents

  Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Kari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-20 19:43 +0300
    Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-07-20 12:49 -0400
    Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? Virchanza <virtual@lavabit.com> - 2011-07-20 11:49 -0700
      Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? TheGunslinger <mikiesrunsbaal.sec@sbcglobal.net> - 2011-07-22 15:11 -0700
        Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-23 16:17 +0200
          Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-23 16:33 +0200
    Re: Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere? SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 05:11 -0700

#7999 — Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?

FromKari Laine <karitlaine@yahoo.com>
Date2011-07-20 19:43 +0300
SubjectIs the C++ standard freely available somewhere?
Message-ID<v_mdnew10bQ4mLrTnZ2dnUVZ8mmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?
-- 
Kari Laine

PICs, Displays,Relays - USB-SPI-I2C http://www.byvac.com
USB and FPGA boards  http://www.ztex.de
I am just a happy customer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOJwWkAAoJEPjW/Kjfref2LrwIAJd0wbGcqIz8asRlOlaDBA1L
R+LqxKzyram9VUcsgUIgU8ILtTvUJcyYJhrPf3PHpEGOcLC8q6jwfM25rPeQ70za
iQ4EcpEO0zAhBwio8uMAGZtZbgvJF6AOW2SRS0aLzlh69XI2jSdlRjY5upRxI4Ut
9yS9Bd8j+zq4T6vz29EWd4+WoeoXTHGGzm3uIYR9ZiuH6WHa4tEUtw+65MVnQx0m
vDZ71awoQ/IRHbG3fHiEcvJcziVq/1KVAzQmxbxTL3uNZfeNPBXTFXBsBfvZvnZK
K6YysBmZJkI/YCN6gQdUiU9G3EuMuCY1f7k38sDwpJjfYZh2qVAZ7Qj7sY+iZ/Y=
=euvy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#8000

FromVictor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid>
Date2011-07-20 12:49 -0400
Message-ID<j070uq$l9c$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#7999
On 7/20/2011 12:43 PM, Kari Laine wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?

Probably.  And probably illegally.

http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/big-picture.html#faq-6.13

V
-- 
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#8002

FromVirchanza <virtual@lavabit.com>
Date2011-07-20 11:49 -0700
Message-ID<18c228da-f212-493a-a9c6-575518d403a3@fq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#7999
On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?


If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat, wade
out and click this link:

http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#8113

FromTheGunslinger <mikiesrunsbaal.sec@sbcglobal.net>
Date2011-07-22 15:11 -0700
Message-ID<qusj275teunav41u2sg2lh5cei2oedg8at@4ax.com>
In reply to#8002
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT), Virchanza
<virtual@lavabit.com> wrote:

>On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?
>
>
>If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat, wade
>out and click this link:
>
>http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf


There was a DRAFT of the new standard that was just ratified.

I think this is the info you need to find a copy:

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N 4411 2008-10-09
Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute, 25
West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932;
Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: lrajchel@ansi.org
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22
Programming Languages
Document Type: Text for CD Ballot
Document Title: ISO/IEC 14882, Programming language – C++
Document Source: WG 21 Convener (P.J. Plauger)
Document Status: This document is circulated to National Bodies for
ballot. Please submit
your vote via the online balloting system by the due date indicated.
Action ID:
Due Date: 2009-01-10
No. of Pages: 1314

IMHO,

MJR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#8128

From"Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk>
Date2011-07-23 16:17 +0200
Message-ID<9903fuFkq4U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#8113
TheGunslinger wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT), Virchanza
> <virtual@lavabit.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?
>>
>>
>> If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat,
>> wade out and click this link:
>>
>> http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf
>
>
> There was a DRAFT of the new standard that was just ratified.
>
> I think this is the info you need to find a copy:
>
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N 4411 2008-10-09
> Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute,
> 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932;
> Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: lrajchel@ansi.org
> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22
> Programming Languages
> Document Type: Text for CD Ballot
> Document Title: ISO/IEC 14882, Programming language - C++
> Document Source: WG 21 Convener (P.J. Plauger)
> Document Status: This document is circulated to National Bodies for
> ballot. Please submit
> your vote via the online balloting system by the due date indicated.
> Action ID:
> Due Date: 2009-01-10
> No. of Pages: 1314
>

That sounds like an on revision.

The latest (and final) is dated 2011-04-11, and is NOT freely 
available.


Bo Persson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#8130

From"Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk>
Date2011-07-23 16:33 +0200
Message-ID<9904dqFri2U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#8128
Bo Persson wrote:
> TheGunslinger wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:49:08 -0700 (PDT), Virchanza
>> <virtual@lavabit.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 20, 5:43 pm, Kari Laine <karitla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?
>>>
>>>
>>> If you're close to international waters, you could hop on a boat,
>>> wade out and click this link:
>>>
>>> http://cs.nyu.edu/courses/summer11/G22.2110-001/documents/c++2003std.pdf
>>
>>
>> There was a DRAFT of the new standard that was just ratified.
>>
>> I think this is the info you need to find a copy:
>>
>> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N 4411 2008-10-09
>> Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute,
>> 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932;
>> Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: lrajchel@ansi.org
>> ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22
>> Programming Languages
>> Document Type: Text for CD Ballot
>> Document Title: ISO/IEC 14882, Programming language - C++
>> Document Source: WG 21 Convener (P.J. Plauger)
>> Document Status: This document is circulated to National Bodies for
>> ballot. Please submit
>> your vote via the online balloting system by the due date
>> indicated. Action ID:
>> Due Date: 2009-01-10
>> No. of Pages: 1314
>>
>
> That sounds like an on revision.

  or "old" revision.

>
> The latest (and final) is dated 2011-04-11, and is NOT freely
> available.
>


 Bo Persson


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#8196

FromSG <s.gesemann@gmail.com>
Date2011-07-25 05:11 -0700
Message-ID<08263a45-3d31-4c68-b15e-eff02e13aafb@t9g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>
In reply to#7999
On 20 Jul., 18:43, Kari Laine wrote:
>
> Is the C++ standard freely available somewhere?

Not legally.
Occasionally, I use a very very early C++0x draft as close
approximation to C++03.

See
  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/
and look for
  N1804.pdf

I havn't checked what all the changes are w.r.t. c++03. So far, I'm
not aware of any significant change. There is no "long long", no
additional keywords, no rvalue references, no lambdas, no additional
standard headers.

Cheers!
SG

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++


csiph-web