Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6526 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Universe <cl3334444@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-06-09 20:06 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-06-10 17:37 -0400 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Re: Is this a functor? Universe <cl3334444@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 20:06 -0700
Re: Is this a functor? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-10 17:15 +1200
Re: Is this a functor? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-06-10 17:37 -0400
| From | Universe <cl3334444@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-09 20:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Is this a functor? |
| Message-ID | <6c88fb03-c772-4664-be54-527ca3c52e26@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
Thank you for answering :) Could someone tell me where C++ Standard mentions this form? I have looked up C++ standard 2003, but can't find it.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-10 17:15 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <95dnirFq1tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #6526 |
On 06/10/11 03:06 PM, Universe wrote: Please don't use the sociopathic "new" google interface, it ruins threading so no one knows who you are replying to!. > Thank you for answering :) Could someone tell me where C++ Standard mentions this form? I have looked up C++ standard 2003, but can't find it. Which form are you referring to? -- Ian Collins
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-06-10 17:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <isu2r7$hkt$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #6528 |
On 6/10/2011 1:15 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 06/10/11 03:06 PM, Universe wrote:
>
> Please don't use the sociopathic "new" google interface, it ruins
> threading so no one knows who you are replying to!.
>
>> Thank you for answering :) Could someone tell me where C++ Standard
>> mentions this form? I have looked up C++ standard 2003, but can't find
>> it.
>
> Which form are you referring to?
>
I think Universe was referring to the form of declaration of the
argument like this:
int bar(double); // declaration of a function
int foo(int blah(double) = bar)
{
// here 'blah' is the name of the argument
// where a declaration that otherwise would be a function
// degrades into a pointer-to-function
return blah(3.14159);
}
I don't remember exactly where in the Standard it is, but I am fairly
certain that it's in the same approximate place as in the new Standard,
of which one can find a draft version on the Standard Committee's page.
V
--
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web