Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #5929 > unrolled thread

Re: Problem with array objects

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++

Contents

  Re: Problem with array objects "Joel C. Salomon" <joelcsalomon@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 15:46 -0700
    Re: Problem with array objects Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-01 10:51 +1200
      Re: Problem with array objects a b <sdagrqewfrgwwfw@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 00:09 -0700
        Re: Problem with array objects Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-01 20:30 +1200

#5929 — Re: Problem with array objects

On Friday, May 27, 2011 11:35:15 PM UTC-4, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 05/28/11 02:29 PM, Paul wrote:
> > You are very quick to dismiss my opinion of what a pointer is in assembly as
> > incorrect but what exactly is your opinion of what a pointer is?
> 
> I was equally quick to dismiss the prediction that the world would end 
> last weekend.

Wrong on both counts.  The world really did end, and this thread is proof that you're now residing in Heck.  :)

--Joel

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#5930

On 06/ 1/11 10:46 AM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> On Friday, May 27, 2011 11:35:15 PM UTC-4, Ian Collins wrote:
>> On 05/28/11 02:29 PM, Paul wrote:
>>> You are very quick to dismiss my opinion of what a pointer is in assembly as
>>> incorrect but what exactly is your opinion of what a pointer is?
>>
>> I was equally quick to dismiss the prediction that the world would end
>> last weekend.
>
> Wrong on both counts.  The world really did end, and this thread is proof that you're now residing in Heck.  :)

Maybe, maybe!

By the way, please don't use the sociopathic "New" google interface, it 
starts a new thread with every reply!

-- 
Ian Collins

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5943

On May 31, 3:51 pm, Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/ 1/11 10:46 AM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>
> > On Friday, May 27, 2011 11:35:15 PM UTC-4, Ian Collins wrote:
> >> On 05/28/11 02:29 PM, Paul wrote:
> >>> You are very quick to dismiss my opinion of what a pointer is in assembly as
> >>> incorrect but what exactly is your opinion of what a pointer is?
>
> >> I was equally quick to dismiss the prediction that the world would end
> >> last weekend.
>
> > Wrong on both counts.  The world really did end, and this thread is proof that you're now residing in Heck.  :)
>
> Maybe, maybe!
>
> By the way, please don't use the sociopathic "New" google interface, it
> starts a new thread with every reply!

Details please? I am in the position of using google groups. I don't
know what this "new" google interface is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5946

On 06/ 1/11 07:09 PM, a b wrote:
> On May 31, 3:51 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 06/ 1/11 10:46 AM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, May 27, 2011 11:35:15 PM UTC-4, Ian Collins wrote:
>>>> On 05/28/11 02:29 PM, Paul wrote:
>>>>> You are very quick to dismiss my opinion of what a pointer is in assembly as
>>>>> incorrect but what exactly is your opinion of what a pointer is?
>>
>>>> I was equally quick to dismiss the prediction that the world would end
>>>> last weekend.
>>
>>> Wrong on both counts.  The world really did end, and this thread is proof that you're now residing in Heck.  :)
>>
>> Maybe, maybe!
>>
>> By the way, please don't use the sociopathic "New" google interface, it
>> starts a new thread with every reply!
>
> Details please? I am in the position of using google groups. I don't
> know what this "new" google interface is.

On the left (as I see it) in the google groups page there is a link to 
the "new Google Groups".  This interface completely buggers up Usenet 
threading by removing the "references" header that news readers use to 
attach an article to its predecessor in a thread.

-- 
Ian Collins

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++

csiph-web