Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121480 > unrolled thread
| Started by | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-02-02 18:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-02-05 11:46 -0800 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-02 18:05 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2025-02-02 11:05 -0800
Re: Now this is just annoying. Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-03 08:55 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-03 14:02 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 15:34 -0800
Re: Now this is just annoying. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-02 15:22 -0800
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-03 14:05 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-02 18:43 -0500
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-03 14:06 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-03 14:10 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 15:21 -0800
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-03 23:54 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 15:16 +0100
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-03 17:46 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 15:33 -0800
Re: Now this is just annoying. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 07:20 +0100
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-04 14:30 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 17:25 +0100
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-04 20:20 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 08:53 +0100
Re: Now this is just annoying. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-05 15:09 +0000
Re: Now this is just annoying. Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 16:11 +0100
Re: Now this is just annoying. "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-02-05 11:46 -0800
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 15:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <laLoP.88960$G93a.62745@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #121509 |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >Am 04.02.2025 um 15:30 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>> Am 03.02.2025 um 18:46 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >>> >>>>> Use getenv() - you don't need environment-variables you don't know. >>> >>>> There are a number of use cases where your blanket statement is false. >>> >>> extern char **environ; >> >> So what? Every version of unix or unix-like operating >> system has provided the environment vector as an >> argument to main. They will continue to do that >> ad infinitum. > >Polling is inacceptable. Auf english, das is nicht richtig. "unacceptable" ist besser als "inacceptable". In either case wtf does 'polling' have to do with the third argument to main?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 16:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vnvv2s$2eb8e$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #121513 |
Am 05.02.2025 um 16:09 schrieb Scott Lurndal: > Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >> Am 04.02.2025 um 15:30 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>>> Am 03.02.2025 um 18:46 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >>>> >>>>>> Use getenv() - you don't need environment-variables you don't know. >>>> >>>>> There are a number of use cases where your blanket statement is false. >>>> >>>> extern char **environ; >>> >>> So what? Every version of unix or unix-like operating >>> system has provided the environment vector as an >>> argument to main. They will continue to do that >>> ad infinitum. >> >> Polling is inacceptable. > > Auf english, das is nicht richtig. "unacceptable" ist besser als "inacceptable". > > In either case wtf does 'polling' have to do with the third argument > to main? Lock-free algorithms poll when a data structure is empty (consumer) or full (producer).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-05 11:46 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vo0f69$2h843$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #121514 |
On 2/5/2025 7:11 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 05.02.2025 um 16:09 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>> Am 04.02.2025 um 15:30 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >>>> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> Am 03.02.2025 um 18:46 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >>>>> >>>>>>> Use getenv() - you don't need environment-variables you don't know. >>>>> >>>>>> There are a number of use cases where your blanket statement is >>>>>> false. >>>>> >>>>> extern char **environ; >>>> >>>> So what? Every version of unix or unix-like operating >>>> system has provided the environment vector as an >>>> argument to main. They will continue to do that >>>> ad infinitum. >>> >>> Polling is inacceptable. >> >> Auf english, das is nicht richtig. "unacceptable" ist besser als >> "inacceptable". >> >> In either case wtf does 'polling' have to do with the third argument >> to main? > > Lock-free algorithms poll when a data structure is empty (consumer) > or full (producer). > This is where an eventcount can come in handy. Why poll when one can wait on certain sets of conditions?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web