Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #81257 > unrolled thread

"C++20 Modules — Complete Guide" by Šimon Tóth

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++

Contents

  "C++20 Modules — Complete Guide" by Šimon Tóth Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2021-09-13 17:33 -0500
    Re: "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th Tim Woodall <news001@woodall.me.uk> - 2021-09-14 07:49 +0000
      Re: "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2021-09-14 07:22 -0700
        Re: "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-14 09:55 -0700

#81257 — "C++20 Modules — Complete Guide" by Šimon Tóth

"C++20 Modules — Complete Guide" by Šimon Tóth
    https://itnext.io/c-20-modules-complete-guide-ae741ddbae3d

"Compilers and build systems are slowly starting to support C++20 
modules. Perfect time for you to read this guide and benefit from the 
massive compilation speedups. This article reflects the state as of 
September 2021."

Lynn

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#81261 — Re: "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th

On 2021-09-13, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
> "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th
>     https://itnext.io/c-20-modules-complete-guide-ae741ddbae3d
>
> "Compilers and build systems are slowly starting to support C++20 
> modules. Perfect time for you to read this guide and benefit from the 
> massive compilation speedups. This article reflects the state as of 
> September 2021."
>

Thanks for the link.

I have a couple of quick questions.

In the "module" example we have
#include <iostream>;

Is the semicolon required here? Subtle, hard to spot change if it is!


This statement:

Unexported symbols have private visibility, which is the opposite of
normal C++ behaviour, where only symbols within anonymous namespaces are
unexported.


Has the export of symbols in anonymous namespaces changed? One upon a
time symbols in the anonymous namespaces were exported, but with a
mangled name that couldn't be deduced elsewhere.


I like the "cleanness" of anonymous namespaces over static. But I've
seen places where the sheer volume of exported but unused by the linker
symbols causes problems, especially for tools that, for example, attempt
to check for circular dependencies being introduced.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81263 — Re: "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th

On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 2:50:20 AM UTC-5, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On 2021-09-13, Lynn McGuire <lynnmc...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th
> > https://itnext.io/c-20-modules-complete-guide-ae741ddbae3d 
> > 
> > "Compilers and build systems are slowly starting to support C++20 
> > modules. Perfect time for you to read this guide and benefit from the 
> > massive compilation speedups. This article reflects the state as of 
> > September 2021." 
> >
> Thanks for the link. 
> 
> I have a couple of quick questions. 
> 
> In the "module" example we have 
> #include <iostream>; 
> 
> Is the semicolon required here? Subtle, hard to spot change if it is! 
> 

The code in the page was

    import <iostream>;

Code uses 'import' not 'include'; also the '#' is omitted.  In other words, no preprocessor at play.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#81266 — Re: "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th

Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tuesday, September 14, 2021 at 2:50:20 AM UTC-5, Tim Woodall wrote:
>> On 2021-09-13, Lynn McGuire <lynnmc...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>> > "C++20 Modules ??? Complete Guide" by ??imon T??th
>> > https://itnext.io/c-20-modules-complete-guide-ae741ddbae3d 
>> > 
>> > "Compilers and build systems are slowly starting to support C++20 
>> > modules. Perfect time for you to read this guide and benefit from the 
>> > massive compilation speedups. This article reflects the state as of 
>> > September 2021." 
>> >
>> Thanks for the link. 
>> 
>> I have a couple of quick questions. 
>> 
>> In the "module" example we have 
>> #include <iostream>; 
>> 
>> Is the semicolon required here? Subtle, hard to spot change if it is! 
>> 
>
> The code in the page was
>
>     import <iostream>;
>
> Code uses 'import' not 'include'; also the '#' is omitted.  In other words, no preprocessor at play.

And to answer the question, yes, the semicolon is required.

From the N4885 draft:

module-declaration :
    export-keyword[opt] module-keyword module-name module-partition[opt] attribute-specifier-seq[opt] ;

module-name :
    module-name-qualifier[opt] identifier

module-partition :
    : module-name-qualifier[opt] identifier

module-name-qualifier :
    identifier .
    module-name-qualifier identifier .

("module-keyword" is "module".  The "module", "import", and "export"
keywords are treated specially.)

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++

csiph-web