Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #80902 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-08-29 20:57 +0200 |
| Last post | 2021-09-01 16:32 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 301 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-08-29 20:57 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2021-08-30 21:59 -0500
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-30 21:53 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2021-08-30 21:59 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-08-31 09:01 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-08-31 03:00 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 23:46 -0500
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 08:19 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 15:32 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 19:20 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 19:44 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 13:17 -0500
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 20:32 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 19:00 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 15:06 -0500
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 20:14 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 20:37 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-08-31 10:08 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-08-31 14:54 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-08-31 15:00 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 12:49 -0500
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2021-08-30 21:23 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-08-30 23:29 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 12:27 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-08-31 07:37 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 14:14 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-08-31 07:06 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 17:20 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-08-31 15:36 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 17:44 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-08-31 09:12 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 18:20 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-08-31 16:40 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 19:04 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-08-31 21:37 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 07:25 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 09:26 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 10:14 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 11:07 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-01 10:31 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 20:27 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 15:22 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-09-01 07:52 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 15:21 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-09-01 09:41 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-01 18:11 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 18:04 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-01 18:27 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 19:02 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-01 21:36 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-02 06:58 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-02 11:34 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-02 14:51 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-02 23:31 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-03 11:12 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-03 15:35 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-03 16:46 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-03 22:01 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-03 20:45 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-04 01:06 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-04 02:12 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-04 09:12 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-04 18:05 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-06 08:43 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 08:59 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-06 10:12 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-06 11:27 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-06 12:48 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-04 15:28 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-04 17:44 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-05 11:24 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-04 10:14 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-04 09:36 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-04 17:00 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-06 11:03 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-06 09:11 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-06 13:08 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-06 15:26 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-07 15:05 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-07 15:07 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-07 19:41 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-08 09:38 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-08 10:29 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-09 10:58 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-09 08:55 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-09 12:15 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-09 09:19 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-09 14:41 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-09 22:19 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-09 16:09 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-09 12:41 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-08 10:24 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-08 20:22 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-09 08:54 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-09 14:47 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-09 16:13 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-09 12:42 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-10 09:37 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 13:27 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-10 05:41 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 15:31 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-10 16:45 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-10 07:21 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-11 11:20 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-10 14:50 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-10 14:56 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 17:38 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-10 15:47 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-11 18:40 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-12 09:23 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-12 12:57 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-12 16:22 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 12:49 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-12 16:13 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 18:45 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-13 10:55 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-13 14:15 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-13 15:32 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-13 12:07 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-13 22:18 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 09:48 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-13 10:52 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-12 23:12 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-13 22:00 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-14 09:24 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-13 21:42 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-14 10:15 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-14 09:12 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-14 15:01 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-14 17:07 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-14 21:42 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 16:13 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 17:45 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 12:23 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-10 17:09 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-10 14:17 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-11 09:06 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-09 12:41 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-09 22:17 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 13:29 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-12 08:56 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-12 09:18 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-12 09:21 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-12 09:29 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 12:55 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-12 16:14 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-12 23:13 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-13 05:23 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com - 2021-09-13 10:56 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-13 14:55 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-12 01:09 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 01:29 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 11:46 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 04:42 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 13:54 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 06:01 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 15:22 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 18:53 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-12 11:29 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-13 08:38 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 17:38 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-13 03:52 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-12 19:10 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 11:32 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-09 18:37 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-07 17:56 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > MisterMule@stubborn.uk - 2021-09-08 10:28 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-08 13:31 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-09 11:06 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-09 01:27 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-09 13:05 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-09 10:29 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-09 22:28 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-09 12:40 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-10 09:51 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 00:07 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-10 11:26 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 10:02 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-10 09:10 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 11:32 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-12 09:00 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-12 11:29 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-10 13:47 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-11 11:02 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-11 00:33 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-11 11:42 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2021-09-15 19:20 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-11 19:15 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-11 20:56 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-12 12:11 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 11:53 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-12 11:17 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-13 12:51 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-13 11:03 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-14 12:05 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-14 10:28 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-15 08:17 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-12 09:10 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-12 21:51 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-09-12 15:55 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-12 21:18 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-13 08:48 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-13 15:09 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-13 05:28 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-13 09:23 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-12 12:21 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-10 05:29 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-10 12:20 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:51 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-03 05:13 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-03 11:30 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-03 11:19 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-03 13:33 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-03 15:44 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-03 17:40 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-03 17:58 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-03 22:23 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-04 12:20 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-06 05:42 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-09-03 08:49 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-03 17:42 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-09-05 04:29 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2021-09-05 05:11 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-06 05:45 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-09-06 03:38 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-06 12:00 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-06 16:38 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-06 15:52 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-07 04:39 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-07 07:23 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-07 07:31 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-09-07 21:47 +1200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-08 10:18 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-08 11:32 -0400
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-09-08 05:02 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-08 13:44 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-09-08 07:41 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-08 16:44 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-08 09:04 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-08 20:16 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-08 17:27 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-08 20:23 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-08 22:38 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-09 08:11 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-09-09 09:25 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-09 18:43 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-09-06 05:37 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2021-09-06 11:54 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-10-06 13:01 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 23:41 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-01 23:32 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-02 12:31 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2021-09-02 11:11 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2021-09-02 16:04 +0300
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? RantingRover <noemail@4u.com> - 2021-09-02 13:14 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-01 21:43 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-01 04:40 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-08-31 15:02 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "see.my....@gmail.com" <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 10:26 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-08-31 19:46 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-01 04:42 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 07:26 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-01 07:41 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 08:03 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-01 08:34 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 08:43 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2021-09-01 08:55 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 10:05 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-01 21:34 +0100
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 10:10 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 10:37 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 10:44 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 10:48 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 10:51 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 11:15 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 12:15 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-01 06:49 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 15:50 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-01 07:16 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 16:30 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 10:28 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 09:57 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 10:13 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 10:44 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 11:05 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 11:17 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 12:17 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 12:48 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 12:54 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-09-01 11:11 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 12:19 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-09-01 18:14 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 20:34 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2021-09-01 21:55 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 16:30 -0700
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-02 05:30 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-09-01 19:03 +0000
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-09-01 21:12 +0200
Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-09-01 16:32 -0400
Page 13 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 Next page →
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-08 20:16 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shaumm$mtn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81099 |
On 08/09/2021 18:04, daniel...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, September 8, 2021 at 10:44:46 AM UTC-4, David Brown wrote: >>> >> Nothing stops them. It /can/ be used on Windows. >> >> There may be people developing under Windows that are not experienced or >> knowledgable enough to use GMP, but that is hardly the fault of the GMP >> developers ... If you can't figure out how to use GMP on your system, then >> perhaps you are either too ambitious, unwilling to put in the effort, or >> you would be better off using something that is less demanding (such as >> just doing your calculations in Python, since the Python developers have >> done the hard work of integrating GMP in the language). >> > Which is, of course, besides the point for those that think it is important for > the future of C++ to see the expansion of cross platform, widely available > libraries, libraries that other libraries can build on, and easily accessible via > package managers. I understand that David does not think this is important, > and does not care about it. But David's world of the lone programmer whose > fortitude is tested by their willingness to buckle down and get things to > work is not the only world, and may may not be the most important world. > I can't imagine how you got that impression from what I wrote. Or are you talking about a different "David" ? C++ does not have a package manager, or any standard method for cross-platform distribution (unlike Python, Ruby, Perl, and many other languages). There are many reasons for that - some good, some bad, some technical and some historical. Perhaps this will change once modules become common place, if they become a practical way to distribute packages. And the trend towards header-only libraries in C++ also makes things easier. But no package manager is going to teach people how to make use of complex mathematical libraries - nor is it going to make them need such tools.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bart <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-08 17:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <shao90$92k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81097 |
On 08/09/2021 15:44, David Brown wrote: > On 08/09/2021 14:44, Bart wrote: [GMP] > What were /you/ going to use it for? What are the users of Python going to use that precision for? > Big number support is nothing but > a "cool feature" for your language, so that you can claim it is better > than other languages. It's a scripting language for general use, so the expectation is to be able to do arbitrary precision arithmetic. But a dependency on some version of libgmp*.dll should not stop it working. (Neither do I want people downloading some random libgmp*.dll from any number of ad-laden and probably virus-laded web-site.) > At most, someone (i.e., you, since it is your > personal language) might want to do some calculations with numbers of a > few thousand digits for an RSA implementation. Writing a library with > basic arithmetic at that size is not hard - it's just a "to do" task. > And the result will be relatively small, just like you want it. Well, that's exactly what I did in the end, and properly integrated. It added about 16KB to the executable. It doesn't have any DLL dependency at all (not even one for mini-gmp). And it has some twists of its own: it's a decimal library not binary, and it can deal with floating point too. But it's slow; which means the limit at which some calculations become unfeasible is lower. It's a > different matter from a library that handles vast numbers with all kinds > of operations, dozens of different algorithms for the operations, > optimisations for many different processors, etc. > > Yes, I think the GMP /is/ too big and feature-rich for your needs, I think nearly everything is. An extreme example is LLVM.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-08 20:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <shav3l$pfp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81100 |
On 08/09/2021 18:27, Bart wrote: > On 08/09/2021 15:44, David Brown wrote: >> On 08/09/2021 14:44, Bart wrote: > > [GMP] > >> What were /you/ going to use it for? > > What are the users of Python going to use that precision for? > Most don't. But some do - Python is popular amongst people who need to do a lot of number crunching. (They use Python as the glue, while the hard work is done in C libraries such as GMP and the low-level parts of scipy and numpy.) And Python is already big, so it doesn't matter if it has a big maths library included. >> Big number support is nothing but >> a "cool feature" for your language, so that you can claim it is better >> than other languages. > > It's a scripting language for general use, so the expectation is to be > able to do arbitrary precision arithmetic. > > But a dependency on some version of libgmp*.dll should not stop it > working. (Neither do I want people downloading some random libgmp*.dll > from any number of ad-laden and probably virus-laded web-site.) > >> At most, someone (i.e., you, since it is your >> personal language) might want to do some calculations with numbers of a >> few thousand digits for an RSA implementation. Writing a library with >> basic arithmetic at that size is not hard - it's just a "to do" task. >> And the result will be relatively small, just like you want it. > > Well, that's exactly what I did in the end, and properly integrated. It > added about 16KB to the executable. It doesn't have any DLL dependency > at all (not even one for mini-gmp). > Exactly. Your library will be far more appropriate for your tools than GMP could ever be. > And it has some twists of its own: it's a decimal library not binary, > and it can deal with floating point too. But it's slow; which means the > limit at which some calculations become unfeasible is lower. > There are /always/ limits to the speed of such libraries. As long as it is fast enough for what people want, that's all that's needed. GMP has algorithms for multiplication that are not efficient until you have numbers with more than 100,000 or so digits. /No one/ is going to use your scripting language for that, so what would be the use in having such advanced algorithms in it? > It's a >> different matter from a library that handles vast numbers with all kinds >> of operations, dozens of different algorithms for the operations, >> optimisations for many different processors, etc. >> >> Yes, I think the GMP /is/ too big and feature-rich for your needs, > > I think nearly everything is. An extreme example is LLVM. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bart <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-08 22:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <shbagg$6uu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81103 |
On 08/09/2021 19:23, David Brown wrote: > On 08/09/2021 18:27, Bart wrote: >> On 08/09/2021 15:44, David Brown wrote: >>> On 08/09/2021 14:44, Bart wrote: >> >> [GMP] >> >>> What were /you/ going to use it for? >> >> What are the users of Python going to use that precision for? >> > > Most don't. But some do - Python is popular amongst people who need to > do a lot of number crunching. (They use Python as the glue, while the > hard work is done in C libraries such as GMP and the low-level parts of > scipy and numpy.) And Python is already big, so it doesn't matter if it > has a big maths library included. > >>> Big number support is nothing but >>> a "cool feature" for your language, so that you can claim it is better >>> than other languages. >> >> It's a scripting language for general use, so the expectation is to be >> able to do arbitrary precision arithmetic. >> >> But a dependency on some version of libgmp*.dll should not stop it >> working. (Neither do I want people downloading some random libgmp*.dll >> from any number of ad-laden and probably virus-laded web-site.) >> >>> At most, someone (i.e., you, since it is your >>> personal language) might want to do some calculations with numbers of a >>> few thousand digits for an RSA implementation. Writing a library with >>> basic arithmetic at that size is not hard - it's just a "to do" task. >>> And the result will be relatively small, just like you want it. >> >> Well, that's exactly what I did in the end, and properly integrated. It >> added about 16KB to the executable. It doesn't have any DLL dependency >> at all (not even one for mini-gmp). >> > > Exactly. Your library will be far more appropriate for your tools than > GMP could ever be. That's true. It would have been a poor fit for my stuff. But at the time I just wanted to try it out. >> And it has some twists of its own: it's a decimal library not binary, >> and it can deal with floating point too. But it's slow; which means the >> limit at which some calculations become unfeasible is lower. >> > > There are /always/ limits to the speed of such libraries. As long as it > is fast enough for what people want, that's all that's needed. GMP has > algorithms for multiplication that are not efficient until you have > numbers with more than 100,000 or so digits. I can square a 100,000-digit number in about 1.6 seconds. Mini-gmp does it in 1.5 seconds, but that is highly optimised via gcc -O3. (I'm handicapped a little by working in decimal, and also in floating point, however I can convert to text near-instantly.) The built-in routines of CPython appear to take 0.05 seconds. The most optimised routines I think go even faster than that. > /No one/ is going to use > your scripting language for that, so what would be the use in having > such advanced algorithms in it? The algorithms I use for quick compilation work pretty well! This builds my entire script language (compiler, interpreter and runtime) from sources in 1/6th of a second: C:\qx>tm mm qq Compiling qq.m---------- to qq.exe TM: 0.17 That includes the bignum library. Here it is in action: C:\qx>qq -p:"print (2L**1000000).len" 301030 (Number of digits in 2**1000000, which appears related to log(2) for obvious reasons.) Meanwhile on the same machine, here is gcc building hello.c: C:\c>tm gcc hello.c TM: 0.41 # clang takes 0.53, msvc 0.41 seconds No doubt your machine will run gcc more quickly, but it would probably run my compiler faster too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-09 08:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shcfjl$1krn$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #81092 |
Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> wrote: > So it makes sense for fair share of number crunching specialists to say > that they do not care if GMP can be built for Windows and so to help > them better also the GMP developers should care about it less. > Simple and not very power hungry need of arbitrary precision integer > arithmetics however can be satisfied by not using GMP but other things > for example Boost.Multiprecision (that has modern interface and is quite > simple to build for very lot of platforms). Yeah, why would anybody want to use the most efficient and best library if they don't have access to a multi-million-dollar server farm? Even the notion is totally ludicrous!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-09 09:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0766cfec-c0cc-4b52-93af-a31f7d51bc72n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #81109 |
On Thursday, 9 September 2021 at 11:11:51 UTC+3, Juha Nieminen wrote: > Öö Tiib <oot...@hot.ee> wrote: > > So it makes sense for fair share of number crunching specialists to say > > that they do not care if GMP can be built for Windows and so to help > > them better also the GMP developers should care about it less. > > Simple and not very power hungry need of arbitrary precision integer > > arithmetics however can be satisfied by not using GMP but other things > > for example Boost.Multiprecision (that has modern interface and is quite > > simple to build for very lot of platforms). > Yeah, why would anybody want to use the most efficient and best library > if they don't have access to a multi-million-dollar server farm? Even > the notion is totally ludicrous! There are no silver bullet libraries. Depending on problem other libraries (like NTL, LiDIA or CLN) can work faster than GMP. But it indeed has to be quite a problem for quite a data centre for such choice to be important and give significantly faster ROI.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-09 18:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3Bs_I.10026$2e3.8244@fx29.iad> |
| In reply to | #81109 |
Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes: >Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> wrote: >> So it makes sense for fair share of number crunching specialists to say >> that they do not care if GMP can be built for Windows and so to help >> them better also the GMP developers should care about it less. >> Simple and not very power hungry need of arbitrary precision integer >> arithmetics however can be satisfied by not using GMP but other things >> for example Boost.Multiprecision (that has modern interface and is quite >> simple to build for very lot of platforms). > >Yeah, why would anybody want to use the most efficient and best library >if they don't have access to a multi-million-dollar server farm? Even >the notion is totally ludicrous! GMP is an open source project. I'm sure they'd welcome your contributions to the GMP library and/or build environment that help make it useful to you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-06 05:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <86tuixvq16.fsf@linuxsc.com> |
| In reply to | #81024 |
Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes: > What' I'm saying is that it's utterly *stupid* to spend so much time > and effort to create a library with the intent of being the absolute > best at what it's doing, intended for a very wide audience and > serious applications... and then limit its use to one particular > platform while completely ignoring one of the most popular > platforms. You forgot to say "IMHO".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-06 11:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7567b0bb-07ba-4436-9716-aaf3ed62b306n@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #81066 |
On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 8:37:26 AM UTC-4, Tim Rentsch wrote: > Juha Nieminen <nos...@thanks.invalid> writes: > > > What' I'm saying is that it's utterly *stupid* to spend so much time > > and effort to create a library with the intent of being the absolute > > best at what it's doing, intended for a very wide audience and > > serious applications... and then limit its use to one particular > > platform while completely ignoring one of the most popular > > platforms. > You forgot to say "IMHO". Redundant, surely. Whose opinion could it be, if not Juha 's? Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-10-06 13:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <86ily9rkg9.fsf@linuxsc.com> |
| In reply to | #81072 |
"daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> writes: > On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 8:37:26 AM UTC-4, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> Juha Nieminen <nos...@thanks.invalid> writes: >> >>> What' I'm saying is that it's utterly *stupid* to spend so much time >>> and effort to create a library with the intent of being the absolute >>> best at what it's doing, intended for a very wide audience and >>> serious applications... and then limit its use to one particular >>> platform while completely ignoring one of the most popular >>> platforms. >> >> You forgot to say "IMHO". > > Redundant, surely. Whose opinion could it be, if not Juha 's? One of the reasons for including "IMO" or "IMHO" is to show that the speaker understands and appreciates the differences between fact, belief, and opinion. Also consider the puzzle related to the very logical island people who deliberately avoid learning their own eye color.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-01 23:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgos25$65l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #80991 |
On 01/09/2021 20:27, Juha Nieminen wrote: > Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >> Ask the developers of GMP. It was their choice. Given the 'G' >> in the name, one could expect that they had no interest in supporting >> Windows. > > GMP is intended to be a serious extremely efficient multi-precision > arithmetic library aimed at all kinds of work, including things like > serious scientific numeric analysis, and it's being used by a lot > of software out there. > > It would be rather insane to exclude one of the most popular (if > not the most popular) operating systems because of some silly > principle. > They don't exclude any platform. It's simply that the people behind GMP do serious scientific and mathematical work, and like most people who do such work, they use *nix. So that is their main platform for development work. Due to the variety of *nix systems, it means their code will be quite portable to different processors. However, it is also likely to be strongly geared towards gcc and compatible compilers (clang, icc). And it is distributed like many *nix libraries and tools - you get the source, and compile it for the system you want to use in the way you want to use it, optimised as best you can for exactly the system you are running on. They don't bother with the Windows tradition of pre-built binaries targeting the lowest common denominator of all Windows-compatible processors. If you can work a POSIX-like environment on Windows - mingw, Cygwin, etc., - then you can download and compile GMP. If you can't get such an environment to work correctly, you are unlikely to be able to make much use of a library like GMP anyway. Most GNU developers don't explicitly exclude Windows - they simply don't go out of their way to spoon-feed Windows users.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bart <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-01 23:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sgov1e$pe6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81008 |
On 01/09/2021 22:41, David Brown wrote: > On 01/09/2021 20:27, Juha Nieminen wrote: >> Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> wrote: >>> Ask the developers of GMP. It was their choice. Given the 'G' >>> in the name, one could expect that they had no interest in supporting >>> Windows. >> >> GMP is intended to be a serious extremely efficient multi-precision >> arithmetic library aimed at all kinds of work, including things like >> serious scientific numeric analysis, and it's being used by a lot >> of software out there. >> >> It would be rather insane to exclude one of the most popular (if >> not the most popular) operating systems because of some silly >> principle. >> > > They don't exclude any platform. It's simply that the people behind GMP > do serious scientific and mathematical work, and like most people who do > such work, they use *nix. So that is their main platform for > development work. Due to the variety of *nix systems, it means their > code will be quite portable to different processors. However, it is > also likely to be strongly geared towards gcc and compatible compilers > (clang, icc). And it is distributed like many *nix libraries and tools > - you get the source, and compile it for the system you want to use in > the way you want to use it, optimised as best you can for exactly the > system you are running on. They don't bother with the Windows tradition > of pre-built binaries targeting the lowest common denominator of all > Windows-compatible processors. There are other ways of doing that, some of which I used to use. For example you can supply a one-file source-code amalgamation of your product (I used C), one step back from the usual one-file executable binary. This is then trivial to build with minimum dependencies (a compiler, which /can/ be as simple as you like; the requirements are different from development). > If you can work a POSIX-like environment on Windows - mingw, Cygwin, > etc., - then you can download and compile GMP. If you can't get such an > environment to work correctly, you are unlikely to be able to make much > use of a library like GMP anyway. > > Most GNU developers don't explicitly exclude Windows - they simply don't > go out of their way to spoon-feed Windows users. > They don't go out of their to remove the numerous OS-specific dependencies their development relies on. And this was my point - they assume the whole world runs on Unix [or Unix derivatives etc]. So in the case of GMP, the first step is to run an insanely complex 30,500-line configure script that will is never going to work on anything other than Linux or compatible system.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-02 12:31 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <sgq5lp$ukd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #80981 |
01.09.2021 20:11 Bart kirjutas: > > Try building GMP on pure Windows (no CYGWIN, MSYS2 or WSL to make it > emulate Linux). GMP is a numerical library; how does the OS come into it? With such libraries, I have had some success by adding their source files directly into my project and just ignoring their original build system.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bart <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-02 11:11 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sgq80l$g2u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81016 |
On 02/09/2021 10:31, Paavo Helde wrote: > 01.09.2021 20:11 Bart kirjutas: >> >> Try building GMP on pure Windows (no CYGWIN, MSYS2 or WSL to make it >> emulate Linux). GMP is a numerical library; how does the OS come into it? > > With such libraries, I have had some success by adding their source > files directly into my project and just ignoring their original build > system. > > That's what I do with open source C code in general; try and build it by just compiling the source files. But often the source files are disseminated across dozens of nested directories. You don't know which source files are relevant. The header files are equally scattered requiring special -I compiler options. You don't know what mix of executables/shared libraries will be generated using which source files. Often this info is buried in make files and you have to extract it painfilly, when a summary in English would help tremendously. (Sometimes just a list of files and options in an '@' file would do the job.) Another thing that is popular, is for the build system (make etc) to synthesise some essential header file necessary for compilation; one that doesn't otherwise exist. Sometimes that file only consists of one line. In the case of GMP, the 'configure' script is over 30,000 lines and only runs on Linux. The source codes also depends on inline ASM so will only work on certain compilers anyway. However, buried within the source code as I saw yesterday, was a tiny version of GMP, mini-GMP, in the two files mini-gmp.c and mini-gmp.h. This is rather limited, it only does integers, and it doesn't have the fastest algorithms, but it seems to work. /This/ is how libraries should be presented. I can trivially turn that into a shared library using: gcc -s -shared -O3 mini-gmp.c -omini-gmp.dll or: tcc -shared mini-gmp.c One C source file, one C header file, one C compiler. (And my distributions didn't even need a header file.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-02 16:04 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <sgqi44$kdq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81019 |
02.09.2021 13:11 Bart kirjutas: > On 02/09/2021 10:31, Paavo Helde wrote: >> 01.09.2021 20:11 Bart kirjutas: >>> >>> Try building GMP on pure Windows (no CYGWIN, MSYS2 or WSL to make it >>> emulate Linux). GMP is a numerical library; how does the OS come into >>> it? >> >> With such libraries, I have had some success by adding their source >> files directly into my project and just ignoring their original build >> system. >> >> > > That's what I do with open source C code in general; try and build it by > just compiling the source files. > > But often the source files are disseminated across dozens of nested > directories. You don't know which source files are relevant. The header > files are equally scattered requiring special -I compiler options. You > don't know what mix of executables/shared libraries will be generated > using which source files. > > Often this info is buried in make files and you have to extract it > painfilly, when a summary in English would help tremendously. (Sometimes > just a list of files and options in an '@' file would do the job.) > > Another thing that is popular, is for the build system (make etc) to > synthesise some essential header file necessary for compilation; one > that doesn't otherwise exist. Sometimes that file only consists of one > line. > > In the case of GMP, the 'configure' script is over 30,000 lines and only > runs on Linux. The source codes also depends on inline ASM so will only > work on certain compilers anyway. > > However, buried within the source code as I saw yesterday, was a tiny > version of GMP, mini-GMP, in the two files mini-gmp.c and mini-gmp.h. > > This is rather limited, it only does integers, and it doesn't have the > fastest algorithms, but it seems to work. /This/ is how libraries should > be presented. > > I can trivially turn that into a shared library using: > > gcc -s -shared -O3 mini-gmp.c -omini-gmp.dll > > or: > > tcc -shared mini-gmp.c > > One C source file, one C header file, one C compiler. (And my > distributions didn't even need a header file.) In this sense SQLite is nice. A complete database engine in a single (amalgamated) source file, compiles without any hassles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RantingRover <noemail@4u.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-02 13:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sgqbmj$8vj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #80981 |
On 01.09.2021 19:11, Bart wrote:
> Try building GMP on pure Windows (no CYGWIN, MSYS2 or WSL to make it
> emulate Linux). GMP is a numerical library; how does the OS come into it?
I think that's a problem with the build system, not with the library
itself. For example, building a project using libgmp with Visual Studio
on pure Windows is not a very complicated process, given the fact that
sane build tools are present, e.g. conan package manager and cmake.
>> conanfile.txt
[requires]
gmp/6.2.1
[generators]
cmake
>> CMakeLists.txt
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5)
project(gmp-test CXX)
add_executable(gmp-test test.cpp)
include(${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/conanbuildinfo.cmake)
conan_basic_setup(TARGETS NO_OUTPUT_DIRS)
target_link_libraries(gmp-test PUBLIC CONAN_PKG::gmp)
>> test.cpp
#include <gmp.h>
int main() {
gmp_printf("Hello world\n");
return 0;
}
>> command line:
PS d:\vc\gmp-test> mkdir build ; cd build
PS d:\vc\gmp-test\build> conan install ..
PS d:\vc\gmp-test\build> cmake -G "Visual Studio 16 2019" ..
PS D:\vc\gmp-test\build> msbuild.exe *.sln
[...]
5 Warning(s)
0 Error(s)
PS D:\vc\gmp-test\build> .\Debug\gmp-test.exe
Hello world
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-01 21:43 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sgoomf$1kh$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #80973 |
On 01/09/2021 16:21, Scott Lurndal wrote: > Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> writes: >> On 31/08/2021 18:04, Bonita Montero wrote: >>> There is no person designing such CPUs today and there will never be. >> >> Never is a long time. > > Andy, you have been successfully trolled. > > Our german friend is rather clueless about the industry. > Even before I got to this I was considering a filter - but some of the replies in this thread have been quite interesting. Andy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-01 04:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sgn086$1qv$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #80919 |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing read of what you wrote. I don't like unrealistic assumptions > which weren't been true for decades ands which will never be true > again. You asked a question, your question was answered, and you respond like this. Why? What do you have to gain from acting like this? It's almost like you deliberately want people to think that you are an asshole. But why? Is it some kind of self-destructive behavior?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-31 15:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gwrXI.5065$Dr.2808@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #80913 |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >Am 31.08.2021 um 13:37 schrieb Richard Damon: >Tell me an architecture with that properties or tell me how propable >it is that there will be ever such an architecture. > Probability is 100%. See Unisys Clearpath C compiler reference manual.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "see.my....@gmail.com" <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-08-31 10:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8f13ab74-4130-4ece-9bab-9aa02eaf8d3bn@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #80911 |
> > sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ? > Why should there be such an architecture ? > On such an architecture you won't be able > to cast the result of malloc() to an int * There is no promise in the standard that malloc() operates on full address space, pointer-wise. I can *imagine* a platform where malloc() returns a pointer from a pool that is a fraction of the whole address space, which would allow this cast to work fine. Note that this is completely independent on the word-alignment considerations. Now, you might not be very happy with such an implementation, but actual platforms where a subset of address space was actually used, or with some form of partitioning, segmenting, windowing, region mapping, banking or whatever, exist(ed) both on desktop and in embedded worlds. The fact that a large fraction of "production code" would break into pieces in such a case is another story. :-) -- Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 13 of 16 — ← Prev page 1 … 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web