Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #91550 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-09-06 20:15 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-10-04 18:04 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 665 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++
Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 20:15 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-06 18:44 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 04:54 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-07 00:18 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 06:27 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-07 10:44 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 18:39 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-07 17:27 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-07 11:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 12:20 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-07 12:52 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 12:58 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-07 13:31 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 13:20 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-07 21:13 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 12:35 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 20:24 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-07 20:53 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 07:37 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-08 14:54 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 05:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-09 17:54 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 19:26 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-09 13:42 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 21:15 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-09 13:37 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 10:57 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-10 06:51 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 17:46 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-10 19:08 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 18:15 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:13 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-10 21:38 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 04:02 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-10 20:33 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 21:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 15:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 15:49 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-11 18:20 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 18:34 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-16 17:06 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-20 01:14 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-20 13:32 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 11:51 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-10 09:32 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:14 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-10 18:50 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 21:42 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-11 23:58 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 14:02 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-18 20:11 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:12 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-10 18:05 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 11:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 21:17 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 12:20 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 21:55 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 12:59 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 13:00 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 10:58 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:08 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 12:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-09 13:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 10:59 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:09 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 11:12 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 16:29 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 12:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-12 04:28 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-11 22:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-12 11:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-12 11:33 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-12 20:43 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-12 15:55 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-12 15:56 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 11:53 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-13 16:23 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 11:10 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-14 14:37 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-14 16:52 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-15 21:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-16 10:03 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-16 05:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-16 16:07 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-16 13:23 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-16 19:38 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 05:45 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:25 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:30 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:42 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:52 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 12:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 21:12 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 12:57 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:05 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 05:08 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 10:43 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 12:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 05:33 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 20:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:16 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:51 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-17 19:20 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 21:29 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-17 19:36 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:06 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-18 17:30 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 19:36 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-18 20:15 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 05:10 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 10:46 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 02:08 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 11:36 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-19 07:48 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 14:11 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 15:41 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-19 16:41 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 19:50 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 12:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-19 18:42 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 05:38 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 20:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-20 07:53 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 12:03 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-19 13:49 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 16:14 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 12:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-19 18:45 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 15:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 05:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 21:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-20 07:54 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 15:18 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-20 14:20 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 16:31 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 11:53 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-20 22:23 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 18:46 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 18:56 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 19:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 19:11 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-20 09:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 11:54 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-20 14:02 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 21:12 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-21 04:46 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 21:52 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 01:23 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 21:13 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 01:04 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:13 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 05:41 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-20 18:46 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 05:42 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 21:24 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 09:47 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:19 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:28 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-21 23:14 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 06:39 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-22 07:31 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 14:15 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-22 18:31 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 06:38 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 23:12 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-23 09:40 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 11:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Daniel <danielaparker@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 05:57 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-21 07:36 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 14:40 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-21 15:05 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 16:17 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:25 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:29 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 17:18 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 07:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 17:03 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:27 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-21 18:42 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 23:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 15:28 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 15:31 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:29 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 17:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 21:09 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-19 09:55 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-19 21:11 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 20:59 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 12:12 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 05:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 21:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-19 18:47 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-20 20:22 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 09:58 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 10:03 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-21 07:42 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-21 14:54 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-21 22:25 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 06:40 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-22 07:30 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-22 04:58 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-22 16:27 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 10:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 19:50 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 17:24 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-22 21:58 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 20:33 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 01:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:02 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 02:59 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-21 13:19 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 05:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-21 15:03 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 07:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-21 20:10 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-21 18:39 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-22 12:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-21 14:44 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-22 13:05 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-22 04:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-22 17:01 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 14:37 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:43 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:40 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 14:34 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-21 14:56 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 17:04 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:56 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:30 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 10:37 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-21 22:21 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:31 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 10:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-22 22:15 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 20:22 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 15:47 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:07 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-18 17:34 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 19:43 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:23 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:22 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 05:11 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:02 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-21 22:50 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 06:41 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-22 05:15 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:52 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 10:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 19:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-22 18:14 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-22 03:03 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-22 22:23 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-17 19:49 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:16 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-18 17:53 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 20:08 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-18 18:15 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:26 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:25 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 13:02 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-16 16:34 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 05:57 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 10:46 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 18:02 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 13:40 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:04 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 14:26 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:32 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 14:35 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:46 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:43 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:27 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-17 18:49 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:51 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:53 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:59 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 13:23 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:09 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-17 19:22 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 15:50 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-17 13:37 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:06 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:27 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:43 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 15:41 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-18 00:29 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:18 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-18 08:13 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 14:37 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-18 21:04 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 05:14 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-18 18:07 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 20:14 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-18 19:42 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 05:16 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-19 04:05 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:08 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:11 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-19 05:50 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 23:19 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 23:20 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-19 07:59 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 10:49 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 10:47 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-19 16:53 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 19:53 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 12:17 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 05:36 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-19 21:08 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 05:37 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-20 03:52 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 21:03 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 12:36 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-20 21:09 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 14:15 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 05:46 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-20 21:25 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 09:51 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:34 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:32 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-21 21:18 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 04:33 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:56 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-18 14:59 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 17:19 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:57 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 14:37 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 20:49 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-17 11:52 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-17 15:43 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:18 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-18 08:11 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 14:45 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 13:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 13:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-17 16:11 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-17 16:01 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 07:20 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 12:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-18 20:30 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 05:17 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-18 22:14 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-19 10:50 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 11:29 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-20 20:42 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-21 09:49 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-21 22:58 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 06:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-22 05:34 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 08:54 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-22 17:56 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 20:12 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-22 18:38 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 06:41 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 22:59 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 08:34 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 08:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 10:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-23 11:20 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 14:23 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 11:53 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-24 02:22 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 19:59 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 20:08 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 10:08 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 07:15 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 13:33 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 08:01 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 14:10 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-24 12:47 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 01:10 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 21:15 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 10:00 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-25 07:15 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 14:43 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-25 19:29 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 06:36 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-26 04:52 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 11:11 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 07:23 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:36 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-26 15:23 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 17:31 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 13:02 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 13:04 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 07:23 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:37 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-26 15:24 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 17:33 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 13:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 18:40 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-28 21:46 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 14:02 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-29 23:57 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 08:07 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-30 14:06 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-01 07:00 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-10-01 13:18 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-01 21:03 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-10-01 15:45 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 05:50 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-10-02 07:56 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 14:00 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-10-02 08:04 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 15:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 12:18 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-01 19:19 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 05:51 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-02 22:24 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 19:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-02 23:30 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 21:24 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 06:19 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-04 22:03 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-05 04:40 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-10-05 07:56 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-10-05 12:19 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-05 21:29 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-08 06:54 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-13 22:51 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-30 19:07 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 12:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-30 12:32 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 12:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 13:24 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-30 21:09 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 20:52 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-01 07:01 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-10-01 16:41 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-01 19:00 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-10-01 17:04 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 13:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-27 14:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:11 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-28 20:56 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:15 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-27 15:25 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:56 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-27 22:37 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-27 15:59 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 16:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-27 16:10 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 16:15 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-27 22:27 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 15:57 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-27 16:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-28 04:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 13:24 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-28 04:46 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 14:46 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-28 06:09 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-28 14:34 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 14:03 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-29 05:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 14:15 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-29 05:37 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 16:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-09-29 08:03 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 17:08 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 11:44 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 20:54 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 11:57 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:00 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 21:09 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:26 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:27 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 21:31 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:34 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 21:37 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 21:30 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:36 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 21:43 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 13:09 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 22:14 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 13:28 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-29 20:44 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 11:15 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-30 15:51 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 18:04 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-30 17:05 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 19:26 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-30 14:56 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-30 19:10 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-30 12:24 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-10-07 22:17 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:45 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 18:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-26 16:46 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:54 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-28 21:20 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 20:47 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 10:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-25 21:53 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 21:01 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-28 21:22 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-25 21:51 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-24 12:46 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-24 17:04 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 22:52 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 23:08 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-26 09:05 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 12:58 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-26 13:58 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:11 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:17 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael Fisher <michaelsfishers61@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:40 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:34 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-22 22:22 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-22 17:44 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 06:42 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-23 15:00 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 17:23 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 20:05 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 10:09 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-24 02:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 12:05 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 12:08 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-25 10:20 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 19:27 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-27 00:36 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-27 14:12 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-25 10:15 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 10:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 10:53 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 07:18 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-24 04:18 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 13:34 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-24 04:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 13:55 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:42 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 08:04 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 14:13 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-24 05:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 14:35 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-24 05:47 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 14:51 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 21:18 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 10:02 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-25 07:15 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 18:11 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 10:47 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-25 18:08 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 15:07 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-25 19:29 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 20:34 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-24 12:27 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-24 17:19 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 14:32 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-24 19:00 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-24 19:35 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-24 12:53 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:36 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-22 22:50 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 06:44 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-23 17:58 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 19:00 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-24 12:59 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:45 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 19:03 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-24 13:00 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 04:10 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-23 19:19 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-24 13:10 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 01:06 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 18:45 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-25 15:51 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 18:21 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 18:50 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 10:34 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 07:42 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 14:33 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-26 15:25 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 17:30 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-26 08:52 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 18:08 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2023-09-26 10:04 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 19:30 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 21:32 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 19:17 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-26 17:09 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 19:33 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-26 23:16 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 19:17 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-28 21:40 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 18:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-26 17:01 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-26 17:13 +0000
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-26 13:21 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2023-09-26 20:45 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-28 21:38 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 11:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 13:29 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2023-09-08 18:55 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 13:26 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 23:33 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 08:53 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 00:16 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 14:17 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 12:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 21:27 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 12:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 22:00 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 13:26 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-08 20:14 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:05 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:10 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-09 14:00 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 11:41 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 19:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-10 17:58 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 20:48 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-09-09 13:44 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 11:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 05:26 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 11:45 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2023-09-07 12:55 +0300
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:22 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:45 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 12:49 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 12:53 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-24 20:18 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-25 00:06 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 13:30 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 23:32 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 04:39 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-02 13:54 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2023-10-02 22:28 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 11:04 +0200
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-10-03 23:28 -0400
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 20:38 -0700
Re: Thread-safe initialization of static objects Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2023-10-04 18:04 +0200
Page 30 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 28 29 [30] 31 32 … 34 Next page →
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 12:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <EQZPM.48734$tTTf.46622@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #92056 |
Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 24.09.2023 um 13:18 schrieb Michael S: > >> Really? I never had read the Standard, but somehow have troubles >> believing that. > > Someone here cited the standard with that. Everything different > like spinning (not applicable in userspace) would be unprofessional. > Kernel-level sleeping and waking up is more or less moving an execution context from runlist to a waiting list and back. Why should such an operation be fail-able?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 11:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uepvjr$1ff81$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92045 |
On 9/24/2023 1:09 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 24.09.2023 um 05:05 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > >> Why do you think that static initialization must use a std::mutex >> anyway? ... > > Call it std::mutex or whatever. It is mandated that contenders > are sleeping - that's not possible without sth. else than a mutex. > > You lost me here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-22 22:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <VnsPM.122464$Hih7.52058@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #91977 |
Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 22.09.2023 um 04:58 schrieb Pavel: > >> It **is** the job of the standard authors to assume what elementary >> operations can and what cannot fail and build their specs upon that. > > Mutex synchronization can fail at least in C++ for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says that std::mutex can fail. This is irrelevant because C++ once_flag initialization cannot fail and the standard specifically advises using other synchronization to ensure that mutex objects are initialized and visible to other threads > because of delayed > initialization "delayed" or "deferred" initialization of synchronization primitives that can be used to initialize static C++ object is entirely your fantasy. It cannot be used for this purpose, period. > since the constructor itself of mutex is noexcept. irrelevant. std::once_flag constructor is noexcept and once_flag initialization cannot fail. > It's the same with whatever is used for static initializatiionsince > the mutex-ish data structure is created when there's contention. Wrong. std::once_flag constructor is noexcept and once_flag initialization cannot fail.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-23 06:44 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uelqeq$lo9j$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92011 |
Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: > for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says that > std::mutex can fail. ... std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. > "delayed" or "deferred" initialization of synchronization primitives > that can be used to initialize static C++ object is entirely your > fantasy. It cannot be used for this purpose, period. The mutex' constructor doesn't throw, so there must be delayed initialization. But as we've seen recently pthread Mutexes also allow delayed initialization of the slow path and Win32 always does the same.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-23 17:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <XbJPM.157838$Hih7.40116@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #92017 |
Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: > >> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says that >> std::mutex can fail. ... > > std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the standard says no such thing. The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative note that explains: "If the implementation can detect the deadlock, a resource_deadlock_would_occur error condition might be observed". We knew that already (using deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for error) -- as well as that no C++ implementer would use a more complex error-throwing deadlock-detecting mutex given a simpler alternative for static initialization. In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and can fail. All it means that, on Windows, to implement static initialization, a C++ implementor has to use other primitives, most conveniently -- InitOnceExecuteOnce -- that cannot fail unless the callback it executes fails. > >> "delayed" or "deferred" initialization of synchronization primitives >> that can be used to initialize static C++ object is entirely your >> fantasy. It cannot be used for this purpose, period. > > The mutex' constructor doesn't throw, so there must be delayed > initialization. Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely in user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) > But as we've seen recently pthread Mutexes also > allow delayed initialization "Allow" does not mean C++ static initialization implementer has to use it. On Linux, mutex_lock tries light-weight user-space initialization internally so no need to reinvent that wheel for implementers. But of course on Linux any reasonable implementer will use pthread_once (which also does not have any delayed iniitialization), rather than a mutex. > of the slow path and Win32 always > does the same. Yes, on Win32 C++ static initialization does not have to use mutex either. INIT_ONCE can be initialized statically to INIT_ONCE_STATIC_INIT -- which is all one needs for static initialization (coincidentally, on Win32 specifically InitOnceInitialize does not fail either but this is irrelevant to the issue of static C++ initialization).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-23 19:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ueo57s$15ub1$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92034 |
On 9/23/2023 2:58 PM, Pavel wrote: > Bonita Montero wrote: >> Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: >> >>> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says >>> that std::mutex can fail. ... >> >> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. > Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general > requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, > timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and > shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the > standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of the > shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the standard > says no such thing. > > The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative > note that explains: "If the > implementation can detect the deadlock, a resource_deadlock_would_occur > error condition might be observed". We knew that already (using > deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for error) -- as well as that no C++ > implementer would use a more complex error-throwing deadlock-detecting > mutex given a simpler alternative for static initialization. > > In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use > PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. > > On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive > deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and can > fail. [...] I don't think there is a timed wait for a windows critical section. I know it has a try, but I cannot remember a timed wait...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 12:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <RVZPM.179438$vMO8.73136@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #92035 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 9/23/2023 2:58 PM, Pavel wrote: >> Bonita Montero wrote: >>> Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: >>> >>>> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says >>>> that std::mutex can fail. ... >>> >>> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. >> Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general >> requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, >> timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and >> shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the >> standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of >> the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the >> standard says no such thing. >> >> The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative >> note that explains: "If the >> implementation can detect the deadlock, a >> resource_deadlock_would_occur error condition might be observed". We >> knew that already (using deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for error) >> -- as well as that no C++ implementer would use a more complex >> error-throwing deadlock-detecting mutex given a simpler alternative >> for static initialization. >> >> In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use >> PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. >> >> On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive >> deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and can >> fail. > [...] > > I don't think there is a timed wait for a windows critical section. I > know it has a try, but I cannot remember a timed wait... It is not a timed wait controlled by the user. But it waits for some time (specified in the registry) and then fails -- that is its way to *try* to detect a deadlock. Says the doc on EnterCriticalSection: " This function can raise EXCEPTION_POSSIBLE_DEADLOCK, also known as STATUS_POSSIBLE_DEADLOCK, if a wait operation on the critical section times out. The timeout interval is specified by the following registry value: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\CriticalSectionTimeout. Do not handle a possible deadlock exception; instead, debug the application. "
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 11:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ueq056$1fihu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92072 |
On 9/24/2023 9:59 AM, Pavel wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 9/23/2023 2:58 PM, Pavel wrote: >>> Bonita Montero wrote: >>>> Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: >>>> >>>>> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says >>>>> that std::mutex can fail. ... >>>> >>>> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. >>> Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general >>> requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, >>> timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and >>> shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the >>> standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of >>> the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the >>> standard says no such thing. >>> >>> The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative >>> note that explains: "If the >>> implementation can detect the deadlock, a >>> resource_deadlock_would_occur error condition might be observed". We >>> knew that already (using deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for >>> error) -- as well as that no C++ implementer would use a more complex >>> error-throwing deadlock-detecting mutex given a simpler alternative >>> for static initialization. >>> >>> In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use >>> PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. >>> >>> On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive >>> deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and >>> can fail. >> [...] >> >> I don't think there is a timed wait for a windows critical section. I >> know it has a try, but I cannot remember a timed wait... > It is not a timed wait controlled by the user. But it waits for some > time (specified in the registry) and then fails -- that is its way to > *try* to detect a deadlock. Says the doc on EnterCriticalSection: > > " > This function can raise EXCEPTION_POSSIBLE_DEADLOCK, also known as > STATUS_POSSIBLE_DEADLOCK, if a wait operation on the critical section > times out. The timeout interval is specified by the following registry > value: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session > Manager\CriticalSectionTimeout. Do not handle a possible deadlock > exception; instead, debug the application. > " Thanks for your clarification. No problem. :^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-23 19:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ueo5ea$162e7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92034 |
On 9/23/2023 2:58 PM, Pavel wrote: > Bonita Montero wrote: >> Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: >> >>> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says >>> that std::mutex can fail. ... >> >> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. > Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general > requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, > timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and > shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the > standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of the > shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the standard > says no such thing. > > The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative > note that explains: "If the > implementation can detect the deadlock, a resource_deadlock_would_occur > error condition might be observed". We knew that already (using > deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for error) -- as well as that no C++ > implementer would use a more complex error-throwing deadlock-detecting > mutex given a simpler alternative for static initialization. > > In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use > PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. > > On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive > deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and can > fail. > > All it means that, on Windows, to implement static initialization, a C++ > implementor has to use other primitives, most conveniently -- > InitOnceExecuteOnce -- that cannot fail unless the callback it executes > fails. > >> >>> "delayed" or "deferred" initialization of synchronization primitives >>> that can be used to initialize static C++ object is entirely your >>> fantasy. It cannot be used for this purpose, period. >> >> The mutex' constructor doesn't throw, so there must be delayed >> initialization. > Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely in > user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) > >> But as we've seen recently pthread Mutexes also >> allow delayed initialization > "Allow" does not mean C++ static initialization implementer has to use > it. On Linux, mutex_lock tries light-weight user-space initialization > internally so no need to reinvent that wheel for implementers. But of > course on Linux any reasonable implementer will use pthread_once (which > also does not have any delayed iniitialization), rather than a mutex. > >> of the slow path and Win32 always >> does the same. > Yes, on Win32 C++ static initialization does not have to use mutex > either. INIT_ONCE can be initialized statically to INIT_ONCE_STATIC_INIT > -- which is all one needs for static initialization (coincidentally, on > Win32 specifically InitOnceInitialize does not fail either but this is > irrelevant to the issue of static C++ initialization). Iirc, I think a windows critical section might raise an error if its been waiting for 30 days or something, deadlocked.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 13:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3XZPM.179439$vMO8.93801@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #92036 |
Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 9/23/2023 2:58 PM, Pavel wrote: >> Bonita Montero wrote: >>> Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: >>> >>>> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says >>>> that std::mutex can fail. ... >>> >>> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. >> Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general >> requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, >> timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and >> shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the >> standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of >> the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the >> standard says no such thing. >> >> The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative >> note that explains: "If the >> implementation can detect the deadlock, a >> resource_deadlock_would_occur error condition might be observed". We >> knew that already (using deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for error) >> -- as well as that no C++ implementer would use a more complex >> error-throwing deadlock-detecting mutex given a simpler alternative >> for static initialization. >> >> In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use >> PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. >> >> On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive >> deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and can >> fail. >> >> All it means that, on Windows, to implement static initialization, a >> C++ implementor has to use other primitives, most conveniently -- >> InitOnceExecuteOnce -- that cannot fail unless the callback it >> executes fails. >> >>> >>>> "delayed" or "deferred" initialization of synchronization primitives >>>> that can be used to initialize static C++ object is entirely your >>>> fantasy. It cannot be used for this purpose, period. >>> >>> The mutex' constructor doesn't throw, so there must be delayed >>> initialization. >> Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely in >> user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) >> >>> But as we've seen recently pthread Mutexes also >>> allow delayed initialization >> "Allow" does not mean C++ static initialization implementer has to use >> it. On Linux, mutex_lock tries light-weight user-space initialization >> internally so no need to reinvent that wheel for implementers. But of >> course on Linux any reasonable implementer will use pthread_once >> (which also does not have any delayed iniitialization), rather than a >> mutex. >> >>> of the slow path and Win32 always >>> does the same. >> Yes, on Win32 C++ static initialization does not have to use mutex >> either. INIT_ONCE can be initialized statically to >> INIT_ONCE_STATIC_INIT -- which is all one needs for static >> initialization (coincidentally, on Win32 specifically >> InitOnceInitialize does not fail either but this is irrelevant to the >> issue of static C++ initialization). > > Iirc, I think a windows critical section might raise an error if its > been waiting for 30 days or something, deadlocked. Exactly, that's what I meant, just cited in the other response. It is, by behavior, a timed recursive mutex but user does not control the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 11:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ueq00g$1ff81$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92073 |
On 9/24/2023 10:00 AM, Pavel wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 9/23/2023 2:58 PM, Pavel wrote: >>> Bonita Montero wrote: >>>> Am 23.09.2023 um 04:50 schrieb Pavel: >>>> >>>>> for some mutex it may fail, for some not. C++ standard never says >>>>> that std::mutex can fail. ... >>>> >>>> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. >>> Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general >>> requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, >>> timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and >>> shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the >>> standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of >>> the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the >>> standard says no such thing. >>> >>> The only mentioning of an error for std::mutex is in a non-normative >>> note that explains: "If the >>> implementation can detect the deadlock, a >>> resource_deadlock_would_occur error condition might be observed". We >>> knew that already (using deadlock-detecting mutex is asking for >>> error) -- as well as that no C++ implementer would use a more complex >>> error-throwing deadlock-detecting mutex given a simpler alternative >>> for static initialization. >>> >>> In particular, on UNIX, an implementer will use >>> PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER that initializes a non-ERRORCHECK mutex. >>> >>> On Windows, critical section is essentially a recursive >>> deadlock-detecting (timed) mutex so it is relatively expensive and >>> can fail. >>> >>> All it means that, on Windows, to implement static initialization, a >>> C++ implementor has to use other primitives, most conveniently -- >>> InitOnceExecuteOnce -- that cannot fail unless the callback it >>> executes fails. >>> >>>> >>>>> "delayed" or "deferred" initialization of synchronization >>>>> primitives that can be used to initialize static C++ object is >>>>> entirely your fantasy. It cannot be used for this purpose, period. >>>> >>>> The mutex' constructor doesn't throw, so there must be delayed >>>> initialization. >>> Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely >>> in user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) >>> >>>> But as we've seen recently pthread Mutexes also >>>> allow delayed initialization >>> "Allow" does not mean C++ static initialization implementer has to >>> use it. On Linux, mutex_lock tries light-weight user-space >>> initialization internally so no need to reinvent that wheel for >>> implementers. But of course on Linux any reasonable implementer will >>> use pthread_once (which also does not have any delayed >>> iniitialization), rather than a mutex. >>> >>>> of the slow path and Win32 always >>>> does the same. >>> Yes, on Win32 C++ static initialization does not have to use mutex >>> either. INIT_ONCE can be initialized statically to >>> INIT_ONCE_STATIC_INIT -- which is all one needs for static >>> initialization (coincidentally, on Win32 specifically >>> InitOnceInitialize does not fail either but this is irrelevant to the >>> issue of static C++ initialization). >> >> Iirc, I think a windows critical section might raise an error if its >> been waiting for 30 days or something, deadlocked. > Exactly, that's what I meant, just cited in the other response. It is, > by behavior, a timed recursive mutex but user does not control the time. Well, in that sense, okay. I see what you are getting at. :^)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 04:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ueo5ps$163k0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92034 |
Am 23.09.2023 um 23:58 schrieb Pavel: >> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. > Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general > requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, > timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and > shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the > standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of the > shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the standard > says no such thing. constexpr mutex() noexcept; https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/mutex > Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely > in user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) If the mutex' constructor is noexcept the kernel-part for the slow path has to be initialized delayed while locking. Rest unread.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-23 19:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ueo6av$166mm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92037 |
On 9/23/2023 7:10 PM, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 23.09.2023 um 23:58 schrieb Pavel: > >>> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. > >> Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general >> requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, >> timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and >> shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the >> standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of >> the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the >> standard says no such thing. > > constexpr mutex() noexcept; > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/mutex > >> Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely >> in user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) > > If the mutex' constructor is noexcept the kernel-part for the slow > path has to be initialized delayed while locking. Huh? > > Rest unread. > Figured.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 13:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Y3_PM.16749$E_d1.14707@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #92037 |
Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 23.09.2023 um 23:58 schrieb Pavel: > >>> std::mutex::lock() can throw a system_error. > >> Wrong. The standard says that lock can throw while discussing general >> requirements for all types of mutices (mutex, recursive_mutex, >> timed_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex, shared_mutex, and >> shared_timed_mutex). Then, when discussing specific mutices, the >> standard says that recursive_mutex, recursive_timed_mutex and any of >> the shared mutices can throw system_error). About std::mutex the >> standard says no such thing. > > constexpr mutex() noexcept; > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/mutex so? everyone has been telling you initialization of simple mutices does not fail. After few hundred posts, you decided to agree? > >> Wrong. a mutex can be created during static initialization entirely >> in user space (like POSIX mutex on linux is created) > > If the mutex' constructor is noexcept the kernel-part for the slow > path has to be initialized delayed while locking. You can rename your favorite part of locking "initialization" for your internal use; but it is advisable to use standard terms if you write for others. Regardless of how it is called, no part of simple mutex lock has to be fail-able. > > Rest unread. yet another broken promise
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-25 01:06 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ueqfec$1i6un$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92075 |
Am 24.09.2023 um 19:10 schrieb Pavel: > so? everyone has been telling you initialization of simple mutices > does not fail. After few hundred posts, you decided to agree? lock() and unlock() might throw system_error.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 18:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ueqoo1$1ndqh$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92089 |
On 9/24/2023 4:06 PM, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 24.09.2023 um 19:10 schrieb Pavel: > >> so? everyone has been telling you initialization of simple mutices >> does not fail. After few hundred posts, you decided to agree? > > lock() and unlock() might throw system_error. > > Well, then it kind seems like you are try to suggest that any 100% compliant and working program that uses threads, is a ticking time bomb that can explode at random times, willy nilly?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-25 15:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <40iQM.146456$bmw6.71801@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #92089 |
Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >Am 24.09.2023 um 19:10 schrieb Pavel: > >> so? everyone has been telling you initialization of simple mutices >> does not fail. After few hundred posts, you decided to agree? > >lock() and unlock() might throw system_error. lock() and unlock() cannot throw any error.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-25 18:21 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uesc36$20j2u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92107 |
Am 25.09.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Scott Lurndal: > Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: >> lock() and unlock() might throw system_error. > lock() and unlock() cannot throw any error. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/lock "Throws std::system_error when errors occur, including errors from the underlying operating system that would prevent lock from meeting its specifications. The mutex is not locked in the case of any exception being thrown." https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/unlock "Throws nothing" You're right only in the latter case.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-28 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <uf5ahe$3unn6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92109 |
On 9/25/2023 9:21 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 25.09.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Scott Lurndal: >> Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes: > > >>> lock() and unlock() might throw system_error. > >> lock() and unlock() cannot throw any error. > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/lock > > "Throws std::system_error when errors occur, including errors > from the underlying operating system that would prevent lock > from meeting its specifications. The mutex is not locked in > the case of any exception being thrown." > > https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/mutex/unlock > > "Throws nothing" > > You're right only in the latter case. > Study up Bonita!!!! Damn it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-25 21:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mLqQM.164530$1B%c.83768@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #92089 |
Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 24.09.2023 um 19:10 schrieb Pavel: > >> so? everyone has been telling you initialization of simple mutices >> does not fail. After few hundred posts, you decided to agree? > > lock() and unlock() might throw system_error. > > On *some* C++ mutex the lock() method might throw. This does not matter because such C++ mutex: a. does not have to be used for C++ static initialization; and b. is not the best solution for C++ static initialization (in particular, not the best-performing solution); and c. is not in fact used for C++ static initialization on common platforms we could check. Therefore, it is not necessary to change the C++ standard and allow static initialization to throw.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 30 of 34 — ← Prev page 1 … 28 29 [30] 31 32 … 34 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++
csiph-web