Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #118221 > unrolled thread

"The state of the C++ developer ecosystem"

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.c++

Contents

  "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2024-01-17 17:11 -0600
    Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 13:49 +0100
      Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 21:46 +0800
        Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 15:27 +0100
          Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-01-20 00:22 +0800
            Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 17:27 +0100
        Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2024-01-19 16:22 +0100
          Re: "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem" wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-01-20 00:26 +0800

#118221 — "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem"

"The state of the C++ developer ecosystem"
 
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3712186/the-state-of-the-c-plus-plus-developer-ecosystem.html

"JetBrains’ Developer Ecosystem 2023 report shows where C++ developers 
stand on C++ language versions, IDEs, package managers, build tools, 
code analysis tools, and AI-assisted development. Let’s dive in."

Some interesting stats there.

Lynn

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#118222

Am 18.01.2024 um 00:11 schrieb Lynn McGuire:

> "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem"
> https://www.infoworld.com/article/3712186/the-state-of-the-c-plus-plus-developer-ecosystem.html

I don't remember exactly who said that, but someone here said
that hardly anything more than C++11 is used today. This study
probably says something completely different.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118223

On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 13:49 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 18.01.2024 um 00:11 schrieb Lynn McGuire:
> 
> > "The state of the C++ developer ecosystem"
> > https://www.infoworld.com/article/3712186/the-state-of-the-c-plus-plus-developer-ecosystem.html
> 
> I don't remember exactly who said that, but someone here said
> that hardly anything more than C++11 is used today. This study
> probably says something completely different.
> 

I just accept constexpr in C++11 to replace those in std::limits, and
some
others I did not know they were defined in C++11.
But I think what the webpage says is sensible, because New C++
programmers will adopt 'cutting edge' technology without questioning.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118224

Am 19.01.2024 um 14:46 schrieb wij:

> But I think what the webpage says is sensible, because New C++
> programmers will adopt 'cutting edge' technology without questioning.

New technologies overburden you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118226

On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:27 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 19.01.2024 um 14:46 schrieb wij:
> 
> > But I think what the webpage says is sensible, because New C++
> > programmers will adopt 'cutting edge' technology without
> > questioning.
> 
> New technologies overburden you.
> 
> 

Surprise! How do you know?
I remembered you liked to use lambda almost everywhere possible.
Sadly I did not decide to learn it exactly for the sake of overburden
me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118228

Am 19.01.2024 um 17:22 schrieb wij:
> On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:27 +0100, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Am 19.01.2024 um 14:46 schrieb wij:
>>
>>> But I think what the webpage says is sensible, because New C++
>>> programmers will adopt 'cutting edge' technology without
>>> questioning.
>>
>> New technologies overburden you.
>>
>>
> 
> Surprise! How do you know?
> I remembered you liked to use lambda almost everywhere possible.

I'm using lambdas to isolate code which doesn't make sense as a sepate
function because it isn't reused or to save redundant code. Both makes
the code more readable.

> Sadly I did not decide to learn it exactly for the sake of overburden
> me.

Of course.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118225

On 2024-01-19 at 14:46, wij wrote:

> But I think what the webpage says is sensible, because New C++
> programmers will adopt 'cutting edge' technology without questioning.
> 

What do you mean "without questioning"? I ask myself all the time: "Here 
is a new tool that does exactly what I need. Should I start to use it?".

And the answer most often is "Yes".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#118227

On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 16:22 +0100, Bo Persson wrote:
> On 2024-01-19 at 14:46, wij wrote:
> 
> > But I think what the webpage says is sensible, because New C++
> > programmers will adopt 'cutting edge' technology without
> > questioning.
> > 
> 
> What do you mean "without questioning"? I ask myself all the time:
> "Here 
> is a new tool that does exactly what I need. Should I start to use
> it?".
> 
> And the answer most often is "Yes".
> 
> 

I was describing those young people just graduated from school.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.c++

csiph-web