Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #87411
| From | Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: problem with c++ union as argument: |
| Date | 2022-11-16 09:36 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <tl2aug$160m$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <tkqbg6$1dvjo$1@dont-email.me> |
aotto1968 <aotto1968@t-online.de> wrote: > error: no matching function for call to 'ccmqmsgque::MqMsgqueCallbackC::MqMsgqueCallbackC(const > ccmqmsgque::MqMsgqueCallbackC::MqMsgqueCallbackU&)' On a side note, when asking such questions, it's polite to do some work to prepare your question rather than just dumping raw code as-is and expecting people to do that work for you. The "work" I'm talking about is making the code you are posting as easy for the reader to understand as possible. This means creating a *minimal* *complete* piece of code that clearly and succinctly depicts the problem you are having and asking about. The easier you make for others to read and understand your code and your question, the more likely it is that you'll get a good answer. Remove all unnecessary stuff, write a minimal example that contains only the parts relevant to your question. If necessary, name your variables and functions more clearly (you can't expect people to know what some gibberish like "ccmqmsgque" means). Just dumping your existing code here as-is, with complete disregard to readability and understandability shows a degree of laziness and unwillingness to help others help you. As a side benefit, in many cases when you are minimizing your code you'll sometimes actually find the problem yourself.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
problem with c++ union as argument: aotto1968 <aotto1968@t-online.de> - 2022-11-13 09:56 +0100
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 11:05 +0100
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2022-11-13 12:48 +0100
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-13 04:44 -0800
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-11-13 19:52 +0100
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-11-13 04:28 -0800
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-11-13 11:39 -0800
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-11-16 09:36 +0000
Re: problem with c++ union as argument: Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2022-11-19 22:42 +0000
csiph-web