Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #86855
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? |
| Date | 2022-10-10 17:58 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ti1fee$remf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <thosit$6fp$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ths1rk$7039$2@dont-email.me> <ad5ab9e6-6982-413e-82f6-dfcbc1b425a3n@googlegroups.com> <20221008201946.00004e88@reddwarf.jmc.corp> |
Am 08.10.2022 um 21:19 schrieb Mr Flibble: > On Sat, 8 Oct 2022 11:03:35 -0700 (PDT) > Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 5:35:51 PM UTC+3, Bonita Montero >> wrote: >>> There is no general answer or it depends on what you expect from >>> this interface. In individual cases, this question is then easy >>> to answer and therefore I do not know why it has to be discussed. >> >> There is a general answer - don't use inheritance except as substitute >> for interfaces, which typically means abstract classes with no data >> members. All other forms of inheritance are known antipattern. >> Use aggregation instead. > > Bullshit. Whilst in general composition is to be preferred over > inheritance there is nothing fundamentally wrong with deep inheritance > hierarchies ... There's nothing wrong in a sense that there's usually no alternative. But nevertheless these hierarchies might be hard to design.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-10-07 09:47 +0000
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-10-07 12:50 +0200
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-10-10 06:20 +0000
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-10-10 07:38 -0400
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-10-10 12:08 +0000
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-10-10 20:47 -0400
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-10-10 15:13 +0300
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-10-10 09:43 -0700
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-10-10 09:26 -0700
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-10-07 14:00 +0300
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2022-10-07 07:29 -0400
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-10-07 05:55 -0700
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-10-08 14:56 +0200
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-08 16:35 +0200
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2022-10-08 11:03 -0700
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-08 20:36 +0200
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2022-10-08 20:19 +0100
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-10-10 17:58 +0200
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-10-09 09:19 +0000
Re: Virtual functions: To const, or not to const? Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2022-10-08 21:42 +0200
csiph-web