Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #82455
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: equal_range sucks ! |
| Date | 2021-11-24 18:18 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <snls60$5av$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <snivjr$afv$1@dont-email.me> <snivuo$d2n$1@dont-email.me> <snj401$dk6$1@dont-email.me> <snkrpo$obk$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Am 24.11.2021 um 09:06 schrieb Juha Nieminen: > Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> wrote: >> lower_bound and upper_bound need < and > comparison. > > I'm pretty certain they only require that the elements are comparable > with std::less() (which means that operator<() is enough). I used the predicated version because I don't want to overload less myself, which is a larger effort than a lambda. But you can use lower_bound and upper_bound with asymmetrical predicates.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-23 15:59 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-23 16:04 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-23 17:13 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-23 19:53 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-25 15:02 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2021-11-24 08:06 +0000
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-24 18:18 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2021-11-28 12:36 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 17:04 +0100
Re: equal_range sucks ! Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 17:23 +0100
csiph-web