Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #80016

Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it?

From Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.theory, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it?
Date 2021-05-31 08:14 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <s91usb$v0o$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <5u6dnc49d9tscC79nZ2dnUU78WvNnZ2d@giganews.com> <s91o3b$e0p$2@dont-email.me> <lL2dnQQqP7v97Sn9nZ2dnUU7-VPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <s91rva$hei$1@dont-email.me> <0u-dneZ5P8tZ6Cn9nZ2dnUU7-a_NnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


>>>>> By suggesting that they kill-file then unnecessary chatter is reduced.
>>>>> This seems to be the final draft of the diagonalization argument's 
>>>>> error. I am very very happy that you suggested that I look into 
>>>>> that. I was able to completely abolish the contradiction.

>>>> Your stop-problem-issues are interesting no one here.
>>>> They're generic to any language, so they're off-topic here.

>>> Kaz was my best reviewer.

>> Then Kaz made the same mistake like you.

> Kaz suggested that I study diagonalization and now I can easily refute 
> this much simpler proof. My refutation is on page 1 and Sipser's  whole 
> proof is on page 2. So far the only critiques have been about punctuation.
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351947980_Refutation_of_Halting_Problem_Diagonalization_Argument 

Are you stupid ? It's no matter what Kaz said.
HERE IS THE WRONG PLACE !

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-05-29 18:32 -0500
  Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-30 05:15 +0200
    Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2021-05-30 12:03 -0700
      Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-31 06:18 +0200
        Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-05-31 00:12 -0500
          Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-31 07:24 +0200
            Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-05-31 00:35 -0500
              Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-31 08:14 +0200
                Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-05-31 01:34 -0500
                Re: Would D ever stop if simulating halt decider H never stopped simulating it? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-31 09:33 +0200

csiph-web