Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #79877
| From | Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles |
| Date | 2021-05-28 15:48 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <s8qsar$2n4$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <s8qjci$poj$1@dont-email.me> <20210528124032.7f6edf3a31673a5311121ec5@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> <s8qlnu$bg5$1@dont-email.me> <s8qls0$bg5$2@dont-email.me> <20210528142900.3d1aa5be0fe09868849d180a@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> |
> No, that's nothing to do with cancellation; it's to do with threads > and static objects. If you amend your first version to issue a print > statement in the constructor instead of the destructor, that won't print > either. It appears that std::cout isn't properly available to the > worker thread when it is first launched (that is, before the sleep). It's not about cout not being workig - it works always -, it's about cancellation not to work if I activate the cout.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles MrSpook_ry@939_6htz773e0qeya.eu - 2021-05-27 08:18 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 11:02 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles MrSpook_b28s@jxgz6zklebr1.tv - 2021-05-27 10:24 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 12:33 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 12:40 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 12:55 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles MrSpook_d4c3Jb7l7@8dftupdzk09cop2.co.uk - 2021-05-27 11:05 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 13:14 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 13:18 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles MrSpook_b_x@ukpge.org - 2021-05-27 15:54 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-27 19:32 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-27 19:00 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-27 17:52 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 05:24 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 05:27 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-05-28 14:59 +1200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-27 20:37 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-05-28 16:50 +1200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 06:53 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-27 23:07 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 08:26 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2021-05-28 21:01 +1200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 13:04 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 17:06 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2021-05-28 17:51 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 20:00 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 21:42 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 17:03 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 03:55 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-28 12:02 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 13:15 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-28 12:40 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 13:55 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 13:57 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-28 14:29 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 15:48 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 16:16 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-28 15:45 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 17:30 +0200
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-28 19:54 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-28 15:08 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@gmail.com> - 2021-05-28 17:08 +0000
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-29 01:42 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-29 13:05 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-29 13:44 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-29 06:34 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-29 14:48 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-29 07:59 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-29 18:15 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-29 19:03 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2021-05-30 11:48 +0100
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-30 09:35 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2021-05-29 06:51 -0700
Re: std::thread does not follow RAII principles MrSpook_jx@zp238i0_j1.net - 2021-05-28 11:11 +0000
csiph-web