Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW

From	"Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW
Date	2019-12-28 07:59 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<qu6ugg$2o2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <qu4j90$5cr$1@news.albasani.net> <qu64fg$qnh$1@redfloyd.dont-email.me> <qu6shu$hlq$1@news.albasani.net> <qu6tgl$v1l$1@dont-email.me> <qu6tln$eba$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 28.12.2019 07:45, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> And I've also never seen a FAQ.
> 
>> The C++ FAQ now resides at
>> <url: https://isocpp.org/faq>
>> It's no longer specific to this group: the clc++-specific material has 
>> been edited out of Marshall Cline's original FAQ.
>> That material is however still present in Dietmar Kuehl's mirror (and 
>> other mirrors, there were a host of them once) of the original FAQ, at
>> <url: http://www.dietmar-kuehl.de/mirror/c++-faq/>
> 
> A FAQ that is valid for a newsgroup is regulary posted on this.

It used to be posted, by Marshall.

Unfortunately he is now old and I would guess, not in best of health. He 
essentially passed the FAQ maintenance over to Herb, Bjarne and Andrei. 
And they removed the clc++-specific stuff and don't post the FAQ.

Dietmar Kuehls mirror of the original FAQ is the closest to a FAQ for 
the group, because it was the FAQ for the group. Unlike many other 
Usenet groups there was never a /charter/ for clc++, but re the original 
discussion up-thread about Qt and Windows it's perhaps relevant that the 
now defunct moderated sister group clc++m was created due to a too large 
influx of Windows-specific postings in clc++, so that a group for more 
pure C++ was needed -- a high s/n ratio is strongly desired. Alas, like 
the FAQ postings, the group charter infrastructure has just ceased 
functioning so the group will never get an official charter.

- Alf

Thread

A question on RegOpenKeyExW T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-27 00:57 -0800
  Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2019-12-27 01:03 -0800
    Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-12-27 10:35 +0100
      Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> - 2019-12-27 15:35 -0800
        Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-12-28 07:26 +0100
          Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-12-28 07:42 +0100
            Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-12-28 07:45 +0100
              Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-12-28 07:59 +0100
  Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-27 03:08 -0800
    Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2019-12-27 14:52 +0100
      Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2019-12-27 16:05 +0100
        Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-27 13:31 -0800
          [OT] Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2019-12-28 11:39 +0200
            Re: [OT] Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2019-12-28 12:10 +0100
              Re: [OT] Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2020-01-15 21:45 +0000
            Re: [OT] Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2019-12-28 12:48 +0100
          Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW Manfred <noname@invalid.add> - 2019-12-28 18:14 +0100
      Re: A question on RegOpenKeyExW T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2019-12-27 13:27 -0800

csiph-web