Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #7902
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." |
| Date | Sun, 17 Jul 2011 03:59:02 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 28 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2011.07.17.03.59.02@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ivm054$1js$1@speranza.aioe.org> <c1586df3-d298-4ff3-b6b8-4c368dfb5b00@e35g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <ivr5gb$csh$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2011.07.16.12.53.43@gmail.com> <ivssq2$n3h$1@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | uqlV+6kNo2Z0TnMsKGN6tA.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:7902 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:37:29 -0500, MikeP wrote: > Todd Carnes wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:53:39 -0500, MikeP wrote: >> >>> It depends on what Microsoft decides. >> >> Who cares what Microsoft thinks about anything? > > You misquoted me: you left off the wink emoticon. Sorry about that. It was unintentional. > To answer your > question though, the fact is that MS has a lot of power to affect the > way developers create software because of the omni-presence of its own > software. If MS decides to drop C++ as a viable Windows development tool > (incrementally maybe by creating things like "managed code" and > requiring C++/CLI to use .Net, etc.), it can do so and you can complain > all you want to but if you want to deploy your software on theirs, then > you will just have to grin and bare it. (Another example: No inline > assembler in VC++ for 64-bit Windows :( ). I realize after reviewing my post that I probably came across as an a##hole. My question could have been worded better. Thanks responding. You make some good points. Todd
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-14 02:51 -0300
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-07-14 09:21 +0000
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-07-14 11:52 -0500
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 01:28 -0700
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-15 23:53 -0500
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 12:53 +0000
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-16 15:37 -0500
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-17 03:59 +0000
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> - 2011-07-17 00:20 -0500
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 10:39 +0100
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2011-07-16 04:38 -0700
Re: What's your opinion? "C++ is back..." Surinder Singh <surinder@teranews.com> - 2011-07-20 00:36 +0530
csiph-web