Re: Why use C++?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed2.atman.pl!newsfeed.atman.pl!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Duga Chernobyl" <duga_c3@gmx.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Why use C++?
Date	Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:37:20 +0200
Organization	ATMAN - ATM S.A.
Lines	33
Message-ID	<op.v0xb0iik42vrml@debian> (permalink)
References	<28bced55-7cfb-4bb0-9743-6ded548853ef@s2g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <ca23c1cb-982d-43a5-b1e7-4044474a11c7@x11g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	user-109-243-100-255.play-internet.pl
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding	Quoted-Printable
X-Trace	node2.news.atman.pl 1314535038 31451 109.243.100.255 (28 Aug 2011 12:37:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	usenet@atman.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:37:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	Opera Mail/11.50 (Linux)
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:9397

Show key headers only | View raw

Dnia 27-08-2011 o 21:38:55 Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com>  
napisał(a):

> On Aug 6, 2:00 pm, Miro <nickbergeronsem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Don't get me wrong, I don't dislike C++, nor am I trying to rile up
>> the great gurus among us, however, I fail to see a practical reason to
>> use this language much as I go about my hacking life.
>
> Hackers should stay away from C++.  They'll just hurt themselves.  Let
> the developers, engineers, and other adults do the C++.  Stick to Perl
> or something where what you're making isn't expected to be readable by
> anyone anyway, including yourself in 3 days.

For hackers is pure assembler ;-)

Anyway: c is structural, c++ is object oriented. You choose want you want.  
C is not worse than c++. In c you can do as much as in c++. It is only  
different way of thinking and programming. C - callbacks, C++  
constructor/destructors ;-)

Assembler is procedural ;-) (but some compilers f.e. nasm supports  
structures)

Thread

Why use C++? Miro <nickbergeronsemail@gmail.com> - 2011-08-06 14:00 -0700
  Re: Why use C++? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-08-06 22:29 +0000
  Re: Why use C++? SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2011-08-12 02:11 -0700
    Re: Why use C++? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-21 16:44 -0700
      Re: Why use C++? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 01:47 -0700
        Re: Why use C++? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-08-23 20:01 +0200
          Re: Why use C++? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-01 02:08 -0700
        Re: Why use C++? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-26 08:25 -0700
          Re: Why use C++? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-01 02:43 -0700
            Re: Why use C++? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-09-01 15:51 -0700
  Re: Why use C++? Krice <paulkp@mbnet.fi> - 2011-08-13 01:09 -0700
    Re: Why use C++? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 02:08 -0700
    Re: Why use C++? Michael DOUBEZ <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-08-23 03:33 -0700
  Re: Why use C++? Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-08-27 12:38 -0700
    Re: Why use C++? "Duga Chernobyl" <duga_c3@gmx.com> - 2011-08-28 14:37 +0200
      Re: Why use C++? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 04:11 -0700
        Re: Why use C++? Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 16:25 -0700
          Re: Why use C++? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-30 05:57 +0000
      Re: Why use C++? Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-01 02:45 -0700
    Re: Why use C++? Alexei Zakharov <alexeiz+usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-08-28 17:52 -0400
      Re: Why use C++? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-29 07:06 +0100
        Re: Why use C++? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-29 04:17 -0700

csiph-web