Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #13114
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:07:36 -0600 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: C++ Memory Management Question |
| References | <nn4uf7hmc7c5r5jac8cq8qjhsguk8alh77@4ax.com> |
| From | Simon Quinn <sq@nospam.com> |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Date | Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:54:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m31ure1t5h.fsf@btinternet.com> (permalink) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:nigiktKlLX4tIYchSLrPUUnw8kk= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Lines | 20 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-AuthenticatedUsername | NoAuthUser |
| X-Trace | sv3-QpzMNhr/AkR20YpayZVqVc+GQ3Cjq4NHmIBz/q4yBPzV9Lfi0H6QHe+jJZI9KtYXzqUaGPmApF3SVWq!6ziwoCn8ScefLP+fgwxuLUCWPDiDiWh3ehF74JuQmUDFUI0+hEqLMby2TdZ/3A== |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1767 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:13114 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> writes: > .. c)Hopefully the memory released by free() would be enough to allow the > program to exit gracefully (rather than a sudden less controlled > exit). > > Is this sane? Is there a better way? That sounds fine in principle, I think. I'd expect malloc() & free() to allocate from the same heap as new & delete. But if you were concerned, you could always new -- rather than malloc() -- a large array at start-up & then delete that once the memory got low. Scott Meyers has something to say about this in "Effective C++" -- I have edition-II, in which this appears in Item 7: Be prepared for out-of-memory conditions. -- s.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C++ Memory Management Question Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 08:56 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-31 09:44 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 10:17 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-31 12:56 -0600
Re: C++ Memory Management Question jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2011-12-31 19:05 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Carlo Milanesi <carlo.nospam.milanesi@libero.it> - 2011-12-31 18:18 +0100
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-31 13:04 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Carlo Milanesi <carlo.nospam.milanesi@libero.it> - 2011-12-31 19:42 +0100
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-12-31 23:25 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-01-01 09:39 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-01-01 08:20 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-01 19:05 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-01 19:36 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-01 19:49 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 11:26 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 14:32 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 15:54 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 16:26 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 16:58 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 21:14 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-03 11:11 +1300
Re: C++ Memory Management Question scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2012-01-03 20:53 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-03 21:21 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-04 12:15 +1300
Re: C++ Memory Management Question gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 08:20 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 22:24 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 22:55 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 23:27 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-10 01:01 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-02 21:45 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-01-03 00:32 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "Paul" <pchrist<nospam>or@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-01-03 17:34 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-10 00:47 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question BCFD36 <bcfd36@cruzio.com> - 2012-01-10 22:57 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-03 09:31 +1300
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-02 21:02 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-03 11:09 +1300
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Leigh Johnston <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2012-01-01 18:57 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-01-01 22:04 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Carlo Milanesi <carlo.nospam.milanesi@libero.it> - 2012-01-02 00:37 +0100
Re: C++ Memory Management Question yatremblay@bel1lin202.(none) (Yannick Tremblay) - 2012-01-09 17:41 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Carlo Milanesi <carlo.milanesi@libero.it> - 2012-01-13 08:14 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-01 18:05 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-31 07:25 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Torsten Mueller <dev-null@shared-files.de> - 2011-12-31 16:41 +0100
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-01-01 09:16 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 16:48 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-01-03 00:02 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2012-01-03 12:53 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-01-03 19:46 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2012-01-04 00:11 -0800
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-01-04 09:30 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-04 19:28 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-01-04 22:09 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-05 11:43 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2012-01-01 18:13 +0100
Re: C++ Memory Management Question "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-01-01 20:11 +0100
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Datesfat Chicks <datesfat.chicks@gmail.com> - 2012-01-02 16:51 -0500
Re: C++ Memory Management Question Simon Quinn <sq@nospam.com> - 2012-01-05 07:54 +0000
Re: C++ Memory Management Question darylew@gmail.com - 2012-01-10 10:19 -0800
csiph-web