Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #12360
| From | jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version |
| Date | 2011-12-11 20:36 +0000 |
| Organization | Public Access Networks Corp. |
| Message-ID | <jc3496$8o7$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <618ba19e-c74f-4fcd-a16a-a6542270c73d@j10g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <6a34e87e-5a2c-4c1a-ad6e-307b4facc507@c13g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <3a4e0e77-735c-4154-b605-bcf2bd637aa1@q11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> <Xns9FB5D491D88E7myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131> |
In article <Xns9FB5D491D88E7myfirstnameosapriee@216.196.109.131>, Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> wrote: >Increasing the stack size should be relatively harmless unless the app has >many threads. That's what gets you... Stack on multi-thread apps is demanding. Even if some memory is needed for a short time, (heap is what the threads need at the same time, stack is what all the threads need some of the time) the heap allocation may be -faster- (because it uses memory efficiently). Also running out of stack is ungraceful... If you call malloc and it returns NULL (oh wait this C++ you know what mean) you can try to restore some semblance of order. Out of stack, blam! Your files, shared memory?? I echo some other posters that we don't know the context of program. Some app you only run yourself? Quasi-real-time where some people die if it fails?
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Ania <anka.stepien@gmail.com> - 2011-12-07 15:48 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-12-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-08 06:30 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Ania <anka.stepien@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 08:25 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-12-08 12:53 -0600
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-12-11 20:36 +0000
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-12-11 15:37 -0600
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Ania <anka.stepien@gmail.com> - 2011-12-11 14:26 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Larry Evans <cppljevans@suddenlink.net> - 2011-12-08 11:58 -0600
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Ania <anka.stepien@gmail.com> - 2011-12-08 11:41 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-09 06:41 +0000
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-09 12:51 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-10 09:54 +0000
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 02:14 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-12-10 10:33 +0000
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 02:41 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-10 02:42 -0800
Re: Converting recursive algorithm to an iterative version Tobias Müller <troplin@bluewin.ch> - 2011-12-10 11:56 +0000
csiph-web