Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #11172

Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading?

From "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading?
Date 2011-11-01 08:28 +0100
Organization Mojito.pl
Message-ID <g8s5dm1t39do.dlg@localhost.localdomain> (permalink)
References <2u8yuf1f8xnx$.dlg@localhost.localdomain> <46010469-4b5a-4c7c-bc88-f202f3df0841@q13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT), Goran wrote:
> I think both C and C++ languages have no notion whatsoever of
> libraries, *.so or *.lib, including latest C++ spec.

It looks so, yes.

> I personally think they should never get that. C-level
> "interoperability" on library level works primarily because C is so
> simple.
For instance, Python is a little bit more complex and yet it tries
to address inter-operability. Of course, C++ and P. are completely
different beasts and I'm far from trying any flaming whatsoever.


> He who needs something more than that, C, should reach for
> some integration tech that defines needed binary-level compatibility.
> I find it amazing that virtually no such tech, that is cross-platform
> and in wide use, exist today. 

For C++, due to non-standarized name mangling, it's not a trivial thing.
That's why I hoped something has changed recently. Seems like it didn't.
Oh, well... :-)

Best regards,
Waldek

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Anything new on run-time libraries loading? "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-10-31 18:54 +0100
  Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-10-31 12:34 -0700
    Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2011-11-01 05:28 +0000
      Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-11-01 19:49 +1300
      Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-11-01 20:30 +0100
        Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-02 06:08 +0000
          Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 10:03 +0100
            Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-11-02 19:38 +0100
            Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-11-03 18:26 +0000
              Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 20:07 +0100
    Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-11-01 08:28 +0100
    Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-11-01 11:28 +0100
  Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-11-01 16:34 -0500
    Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 10:01 +0100
      Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-11-02 17:03 -0500
        Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> - 2011-11-03 20:40 +0100
        Re: Anything new on run-time libraries loading? "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-11-03 21:06 +0100

csiph-web