Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #11193
| From | gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Big O |
| Date | 2011-11-02 04:15 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <ee9994de-b82b-4466-9e9a-75c7367ea230@eh5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <j8r6fg$ih7$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Gen wrote: > I have program where the other loop runs 'n' times. > When i is 0 in the outer loop, the inner loop runs n times > When i is 1 in the outer loop, the inner loop runs n/2 times > When i is 2 in the other loop, the inner loop runs n/3 times. > If I understand correctly, the code will run n + n/2 + n/3 + n/4 + ... + 1 times in total (I'm including the fractional parts, which won't make any difference, asymptotically. If you want to be precise, you can put an upper/lower bound on using ceiling() and floor()). This sum is the same n * (1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... 1/n), and the sum of that harmonic series is log(n) + Euler's constant + a term that decays like 1/(2n). So the asymptotic runtime will be n * log(n) + gamma*n + 1/2. or, in Big-O its O(n log n);
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Big O Gen <g@g.com> - 2011-11-02 16:06 +0530
Re: Big O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-02 10:56 +0000
Re: Big O Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-11-02 11:26 +0000
Re: Big O "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-02 11:39 +0000
Re: Big O "Scott Fluhrer" <sfluhrer@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-11-02 10:28 -0400
Re: Big O gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 09:08 -0700
Re: Big O gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2011-11-02 04:15 -0700
Re: Big O Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-11-02 11:16 +0000
Re: Big O Gen <g@g.com> - 2011-11-02 18:43 +0530
csiph-web