Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #37071
| Path | csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Concrete classes considered harmful |
| Date | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:35:41 +1200 |
| Lines | 45 |
| Message-ID | <d0isptFflldU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <y42dnfPZC9VKGj3InZ2dnUU78Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <d0dtm9FegarU8@mid.individual.net> <mo0sfb$hgq$3@news.xmission.com> <d0imfgFflldU3@mid.individual.net> <mo1cig$r93$4@news.xmission.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net OtQXYpx8q8odYTmFLZ9TPAvqYybc9rMeW0xwL5Fg7wYwHJR9xd |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:HHft+eSPP99LSP9a34lWWNL14qE= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <mo1cig$r93$4@news.xmission.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c++:37071 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Richard wrote: > [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup] > > Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> spake the secret code > <d0imfgFflldU3@mid.individual.net> thusly: > >> Richard wrote: >>> Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> spake the secret code >>> <d0dtm9FegarU8@mid.individual.net> thusly: >>> >>>> Given the three options of abstract, concrete without non-trivial inline >>>> member functions or Pimpl classes all are equally simple to mock. >>> >>> I'm guessing you're using a lot of link-time mocking? >> >> Yes. A lot of my work is low level system code and down there I'll be >> mocking mainly C libraries. > > OK, given that confirmation, have you looked at cgreen? It's a unit > test framework built specifically around link-time mocking and the use > of C. No, I haven't. I use my own mocking framework that is unit test framework neutral (it's been used with CppUnut, CxxTest and Google Test). I prefer to keep the two coupled so I can use my framework with whatever unit test setup a client uses. > All my TDD work has been in C++ where I could use static or > dynamic polymorphism for mocking out collaborators, so I haven't used > link-time mocking. However, I can see it's usefulness. It's pretty much the only option when you are working with system (or object only third party) libraries. My approach has been to apply the same techniques to pure C++ code and mixed C and C++. This leads to an unconventional approach to pure C++ code where it is the individual class member functions that are mocked, rather than class instances. While this may appear odd, I've found most test cases revolve around checking passed parameter values and responses to returned values. In these cases, being able to use the code generated by the framework rather than having to write mock objects saves a lot of work. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-11 04:04 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-11 15:09 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-11 17:49 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-11 18:10 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-11 13:33 -0500
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-12 09:17 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 01:51 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-12 13:20 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 02:32 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-12 15:48 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 13:46 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-12 16:14 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-13 17:46 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-14 08:52 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-13 22:01 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-13 17:28 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-14 08:47 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-13 22:02 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-14 10:35 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-14 04:52 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-14 19:31 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-15 16:57 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-16 09:49 +1200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-16 15:53 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-08 13:20 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-10-12 20:48 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2015-07-12 11:32 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 13:46 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 13:54 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 14:21 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 14:40 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 14:59 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-13 17:08 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-13 19:59 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-13 20:06 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 05:11 +0200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-07-13 17:10 +0000
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-11 06:07 +0200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2015-07-11 14:12 -0700
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2015-07-11 02:06 -0500
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2015-07-11 08:28 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2015-07-11 15:48 +0800
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Chris Vine <chris@cvine--nospam--.freeserve.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 00:16 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 01:52 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2015-07-12 06:58 -0700
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 15:45 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Mr Flibble <flibble@i42.co.uk> - 2015-07-12 16:30 +0100
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2015-07-12 11:23 -0700
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 21:37 +0200
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful woodbrian77@gmail.com - 2015-07-12 14:34 -0700
Re: Concrete classes considered harmful Luca Risolia <luca.risolia@linux-projects.org> - 2015-07-13 00:38 +0200
csiph-web