Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #10095
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Memory Leak Detection |
| Date | Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:24:27 +0900 |
| Organization | NEC Electronics |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <buovcsvabfo.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> (permalink) |
| References | <7be371ee-c86c-4686-adbb-d0f3f716cde9@j1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <1073300f-64a0-4665-9e6e-a5000808b407@z7g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> <buo7h5bbv4j.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> <4e70444c$0$4388$7b1e8fa0@news.nbl.fi> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| X-Trace | individual.net LppiIXc9smCqwtMOglFFSgIVWasxyHn83X9afrhYCkreHkO9zc |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:gPyDzJi3dQDZe5xkKKs3kXHipuE= sha1:GSuCl/7b9DfctycXnQDhmFKO7WM= |
| System-Type | x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
| Blat | Foop |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:10095 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes: > Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote: >> [Running valgrind on a program for the first time can be a rude shock >> though, revealing tons of little bugs that you never noticed before!] > > Actually if you have followed the basic rules of RAII and all the > rules that naturally follow from it (such as the so-called rule of > three, never use a raw 'new', use the STL whenever it's suitable, > and so on), such bugs become rarer and rarer. Sure, I do follow those guidelines -- and indeed they help greatly (I've found my programs in "proper" C++ to be much less buggy than my programs in C, or in "non-proper" C++) -- but nonetheless, in any non-trivial program, bugs are present, and valgrind is a _very_ useful tool for finding many of them. -Miles -- If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Memory Leak Detection Christopher <cpisz@austin.rr.com> - 2011-09-13 08:55 -0700
Re: Memory Leak Detection Noah Roberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Memory Leak Detection Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-09-13 12:36 -0500
Re: Memory Leak Detection "AnonMail2005@gmail.com" <anonmail2005@gmail.com> - 2011-09-13 11:45 -0700
Re: Memory Leak Detection Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-14 13:33 +0900
Re: Memory Leak Detection Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-09-14 06:06 +0000
Re: Memory Leak Detection Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-09-14 15:24 +0900
Re: Memory Leak Detection Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-09-14 20:29 +1200
Re: Memory Leak Detection Marc <marc.glisse@gmail.com> - 2011-09-14 20:11 +0000
Re: Memory Leak Detection Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-09-14 00:38 -0700
Re: Memory Leak Detection Christopher <cpisz@austin.rr.com> - 2011-09-14 08:22 -0700
Re: Memory Leak Detection Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-09-15 01:09 -0700
Re: Memory Leak Detection Christopher <cpisz@austin.rr.com> - 2011-09-16 14:30 -0700
csiph-web