Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #8489
| From | Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: c++ compiler |
| Date | 2011-08-05 18:41 +0900 |
| Organization | NEC Electronics |
| Message-ID | <buosjpgdwlq.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <j1cdhg$4bk$1@dont-email.me> <12ioeb0ubofum$.dlg@localhost.localdomain> <j1fjli$7ea$2@speranza.aioe.org> <buo1ux0fl9o.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com> <j1gcc0$lbg$1@news.albasani.net> |
BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> writes: >> Hmm, I've found VC's debugger pretty annoying actually. >> >> I suspect (as with most such things) that it depends as much on what >> you're used to, as it does on actual functionality... > > IME, once one gets use to the VS debugger, it is often a lot faster to > actually figure out what has gone on and why than with GDB. Hard to say; I don't use it so often, and even the people here who use it a lot seem to be rather clueless about anything except the simplest functionality... > likewise goes for WinDbg (another graphical debugger from MS, with some > interesting features, but generally more of a hassle to launch). > > the advantage of these graphical debuggers is that one can more often > see what is going on much more quickly, as there is often a lot more > information on screen at the same time, rather then requiring commands > to fetch these details. likewise, many commands are bound to keys, again > saving on typing. Well it's similar to any CLI vs. GUI debate I suppose. The GUI is often easier for raw beginners, for intrinsically graphical or spatial tasks, but slower and more awkward for complex tasks, or tasks that are "language like". My general issue with the VS debugger was that very often there would be cases where you could _see_ interesting data, but not be able to manipulate it, or be able to manipulate it, but only rather awkwardly (o-n-e-s-t-e-p-a-t-a-t-i-m-e... argh!) For complex debugging tasks, this quickly became absolutely miserable With gdb, on the other hand, which is largely based on expression evaluation, while it was harder to visualize data, manipulation of it was vastly faster and easier (and more easily repeatable; often one wants to do the weird manipulation several times). -Miles -- Circus, n. A place where horses, ponies and elephants are permitted to see men, women and children acting the fool.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
c++ compiler krishnakanth <kmanivan82@gmail.com> - 2011-08-03 13:34 -0700
Re: c++ compiler Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-03 17:11 -0400
Re: c++ compiler "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-08-04 21:40 +0200
Re: c++ compiler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-04 15:06 -0700
Re: c++ compiler Qi <no@no.no> - 2011-08-05 10:14 +0800
Re: c++ compiler Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-08-05 15:02 +0900
Re: c++ compiler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-05 02:11 -0700
Re: c++ compiler Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2011-08-05 18:41 +0900
Re: c++ compiler Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-05 07:58 -0400
Re: c++ compiler "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-08-05 21:30 +0200
Re: c++ compiler Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 09:53 +1200
Re: c++ compiler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-05 15:10 -0700
Re: c++ compiler Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 10:20 +1200
Re: c++ compiler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-05 18:30 -0700
Re: c++ compiler Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 15:25 +1200
Re: c++ compiler Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-08-06 10:42 +0200
Re: c++ compiler Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 21:42 +1200
Re: c++ compiler Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2011-08-06 15:38 +0200
Re: c++ compiler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 11:58 -0700
Re: c++ compiler yatremblay@bel1lin202.(none) (Yannick Tremblay) - 2011-08-09 13:28 +0000
Re: c++ compiler Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-07 08:33 +1200
Re: c++ compiler BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-05 12:34 -0700
Re: c++ compiler "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2011-08-05 15:13 -0600
csiph-web