Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #15129
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? |
| Date | 2012-04-02 18:12 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <9tsu9hFfaaU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jl8d4h$hbf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4f788f56$0$4347$7b1e8fa0@news.nbl.fi> <jlbekq$693$1@speranza.aioe.org> <9tst77FfaaU3@mid.individual.net> <jlbf5d$8ae$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 04/ 2/12 05:57 PM, Qi wrote: > On 2012-4-2 13:53, Ian Collins wrote: >> >> Then why don't you just write "int main()"? > > "main" function is only the one in my sample code. > I have a lot of functions that can't omit the parameters > completely... > >> If the parameter isn't used (and named), why would the reader look for it? > > Because the parameter name can help readability and help to > understand the function, IMHO. Surly the argument about how to comment out the name is evidence that simply omitting the name is the best documentation for a parameter that isn't used? I've yet to see a case where clutter helps readability. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Any way to defer template function overloading? Qi <no@no.no> - 2012-04-01 10:05 +0800
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-01 16:06 +1200
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Qi <no@no.no> - 2012-04-01 13:53 +0800
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-01 17:24 +0000
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2012-04-02 00:40 +0200
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-02 11:02 +1200
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-02 05:29 +0000
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 13:48 +0800
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-02 17:53 +1200
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 13:57 +0800
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-02 18:12 +1200
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-04-02 15:32 +0900
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> - 2012-04-02 14:58 +0900
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-04-02 10:11 +0000
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 19:04 +0800
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? Qi <no@no.com> - 2012-04-02 19:17 +0800
Re: Any way to defer template function overloading? jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-04-02 14:41 +0000
csiph-web