Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #13841
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.erje.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Question about destructors |
| Date | Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:43 +1300 |
| Lines | 13 |
| Message-ID | <9petprFlo4U4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ba1d69e7-bd02-4c9a-9ab0-1f674fb3bc56@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <xn0hu2h1h91v2i4002@news.astraweb.com> <f7b07275-5374-4d4e-a679-44d9eb4cd719@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <xn0hu2k3n9605fz003@news.astraweb.com> <jgrnqu$d87$1@dont-email.me> <2115496.607.1328686761742.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@proa7> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net tmdbFgttt+VA27E7DdK0TAASQxqDgWUTHI4GFOX0PgxRqJUuRh |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:duwvB7P56c5vCON0o3kRImZ6Shg= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/6.0.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <2115496.607.1328686761742.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@proa7> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:13841 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 02/ 8/12 08:39 PM, 88888 Dihedral wrote: > It slows down as the list in other high level languages in basic operations. > > The vector part in C++ offers auto-expansion and the boundary checking mechanism > absent from an array. For a list or a vector in C++ of tens of thousands of objects in non-heavy computing tasks it can save troubles. > > But for digital images and videos of tens of millions of pixels to be processed > the C++ vector adds overheads, too. No more than naked dynamic arrays. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question about destructors Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-07 06:53 -0800
Re: Question about destructors "Fred Zwarts \(KVI\)" <F.Zwarts@KVI.nl> - 2012-02-07 16:11 +0100
Re: Question about destructors "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-07 15:38 +0000
Re: Question about destructors Gus Gassmann <horand.gassmann@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-07 09:13 -0800
Re: Question about destructors "Asger Joergensen" <Junk@Asger-P.dk> - 2012-02-07 17:34 +0000
Re: Question about destructors Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2012-02-07 12:42 -0500
Re: Question about destructors 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-07 23:39 -0800
Re: Question about destructors Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-08 22:32 +1300
Re: Question about destructors Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-08 17:51 +0000
Re: Question about destructors Gert-Jan de Vos <gert-jan.de.vos@onsneteindhoven.nl> - 2012-02-08 10:47 -0800
Re: Question about destructors SG <s.gesemann@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 04:35 -0800
Re: Question about destructors 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-11 08:17 -0800
Re: Question about destructors Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-07 15:12 -0800
Re: Question about destructors Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-02-08 06:38 +0000
Re: Question about destructors Peter Remmers <p.remmers@expires-2011-04-30.arcornews.de> - 2012-02-09 00:30 +0100
Re: Question about destructors Peter Remmers <p.remmers@expires-2011-04-30.arcornews.de> - 2012-02-09 00:56 +0100
Re: Question about destructors Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 14:34 -0800
Re: Question about destructors Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-13 17:48 +0000
csiph-web