Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #13568
| From | "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Another C++ performance article |
| Date | 2012-01-24 23:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9o8osfFhfvU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jfmvpn$6k9$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cholo Lennon wrote:
> May be this post is a bit off topic:
>
> Do you think this article is fair with C++?
>
> http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/304935/Operation-Performance-Evaluation
Any C++ benchmark starting like this
int main()
{
int* A = new int[SIZE];
int* B = new int[SIZE];
int* C = new int[SIZE];
is obviously not serious. LOL!Bo Persson
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Another C++ performance article Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 16:13 -0300
Re: Another C++ performance article Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-01-24 20:05 +0000
Re: Another C++ performance article "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-24 15:27 -0600
Re: Another C++ performance article Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 19:10 -0300
Re: Another C++ performance article "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2012-01-24 23:15 +0100
Re: Another C++ performance article Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-25 06:17 +0000
Re: Another C++ performance article Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2012-01-25 06:44 +0000
csiph-web