Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #9205
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? |
| Date | 2011-08-23 08:57 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <9bfu5gFs5qU4@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <growth-20110822214337@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <9bfqvfFs5qU2@mid.individual.net> <dialog-20110822221621@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <9bft4lFs5qU3@mid.individual.net> <flush-20110822224917@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
On 08/23/11 08:50 AM, Stefan Ram wrote: > Ian Collins<ian-news@hotmail.com> writes: >> That doesn't answer my question, when interacting with a user, have you >> ever seen a case where a flush is detrimental to the operation of a program? > > I have not investigated this question. > > C++ is hard, large, and complex but fast. One uses C++, when > programs need to run fast. Otherwise, other programming languages > are more efficient in terms of programming effort and provide > better security. > > Console dialogs with users do not need a fast programming > language, since they wait for user input most of the time > anyways. > > Since C++ is already optimized to enable the best run-time > efficiency, even when this means, that programming becomes > more difficult, usually a programming styles that cares for > run-time efficiency is more adopted to the language. That's a very long winded way of saying you haven't. So you agree that using std::endl is preferable to '\n' when outputting text to be read by a user? -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? mrc2323@cox.net (Mike Copeland) - 2011-08-20 20:49 -0700
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-08-20 21:12 -0700
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-21 17:21 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-21 17:20 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Eugén Jung <contact@eugenjung.tk> - 2011-08-21 23:19 +0100
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-22 11:38 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 07:34 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-08-22 15:54 -0400
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 08:02 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 08:39 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-23 08:57 +1200
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Paul <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-08-23 02:47 -0700
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-26 08:07 -0700
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-26 08:00 -0700
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-22 06:13 +0000
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-22 10:49 -0700
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-08-23 07:01 +0000
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-08-24 07:11 +0100
Re: cin - Why Does It Require 2 Returns? James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-08-26 08:12 -0700
csiph-web