Re: Why your next language better be C++

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.wtal.de!news.tal.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	"Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: Why your next language better be C++
Date	Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:42:05 +0200
Lines	37
Message-ID	<98ra7kFen3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<j01me4$fq6$1@dont-email.me> <0293d8cf-885a-4509-98d4-bbe825413671@h12g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <j07laq$704$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace	individual.net MTxSB3ihgn87TcvbPuhbxgWg9H7spehfooIo1z7h9ZxIaDQ6Ow
Cancel-Lock	sha1:4wDlzvMp0N3yKqGtzsu4qXpF63k=
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109
X-RFC2646	Format=Flowed; Response
X-Antivirus	avast! (VPS 110721-0, 2011-07-21), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status	Clean
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:8049

Show key headers only | View raw

Lynn McGuire wrote:
> On 7/20/2011 3:12 PM, James Kanze wrote:
>> On Jul 18, 5:18 pm, Lynn McGuire<l...@winsim.com>  wrote:
>>> Why your next language better be C++:
>>> 
>>> http://www.i-programmer.info/professional-programmer/i-programmer/267...
>>
>>> "It looks as if the war between C++ and C# is over
>>> and C++ has won."
>>
>> More idiot ramblings.,  There was never a war between C++ and
>> C#, so there can't be any winner or looser.  The languages
>> address different problems: C# isn't actually that bad---for
>> what it is designed to do.  C++ is better, for what it was
>> designed to do (and that's a lot of things) than any of the
>> alternatives; most of the other languages one sees today are
>> designed for much smaller niches, where they're often very good.
>> (We use C++, C#, Java, Python, and Perl, in different places.
>> Not to mention GMake, Solution and project files, etc., etc.)
>>
>> --
>> James Kanze
>
> If you read Microsoft publications then they sure have
> been presenting C# as a successor to C++.  Several of the
> articles implied that the System people were totally
> rewriting Windows in C#.  Looks like the System and
> Office people totally ignored the Language people or won
> all the battles.
>

That's marketing, what does that have to do with anything?


Bo Persson

Thread

Why your next language better be C++ Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-07-18 11:18 -0500
  Re: Why your next language better be C++ "Paul" <pchristor@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-07-18 19:46 +0100
  Re: Why your next language better be C++ Goran <goran.pusic@gmail.com> - 2011-07-19 00:03 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-19 17:19 +0200
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Noah Roberts <dont@email.me> - 2011-07-19 09:39 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-07-19 13:35 -0500
      Re: Why your next language better be C++ James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-07-21 05:31 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-07-19 13:59 -0500
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-07-21 01:42 +0100
  Re: Why your next language better be C++ BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-19 03:00 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-07-21 01:28 +0100
      Re: Why your next language better be C++ BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-21 00:37 -0700
        Re: Why your next language better be C++ Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-07-21 15:53 +0000
          Re: Why your next language better be C++ BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-21 12:31 -0700
            Re: Why your next language better be C++ Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 10:21 +0100
              Re: Why your next language better be C++ BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-22 10:43 -0700
  Re: Why your next language better be C++ James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-07-20 13:12 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ "JBarleycorn" <jbnh2o@newsnet.org> - 2011-07-20 15:52 -0500
      Re: Why your next language better be C++ James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-07-21 05:39 -0700
        Re: Why your next language better be C++ "JBarleycorn" <jbnh2o@newsnet.org> - 2011-07-21 14:54 -0500
          Re: Why your next language better be C++ Noah Roberts <dont@email.me> - 2011-07-21 13:47 -0700
          Re: Why your next language better be C++ Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 10:30 +0100
          Re: Why your next language better be C++ James Kanze <james.kanze@gmail.com> - 2011-07-22 12:35 -0700
          Re: Why your next language better be C++ "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-23 16:30 +0200
            Re: Why your next language better be C++ BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-23 12:04 -0700
            Re: Why your next language better be C++ Werner <werasm@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 00:00 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2011-07-20 17:36 -0500
      Re: Why your next language better be C++ "Bo Persson" <bop@gmb.dk> - 2011-07-21 20:42 +0200
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Ebenezer <woodbrian77@gmail.com> - 2011-07-20 22:36 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ Michael DOUBEZ <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-07-21 04:52 -0700
    Re: Why your next language better be C++ "JBarleycorn" <jbnh2o@newsnet.org> - 2011-07-21 17:54 -0500

csiph-web