Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #6440
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: need argument for try catch blocks |
| Date | 2011-06-09 07:47 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <95a1v7FrnrU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <6527c940-7e6f-4fc8-a3bb-6e08478ae131@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> |
On 06/ 9/11 03:37 AM, Alexei Zakharov wrote: Please don't use the sociopathic "new" google interface, it ruins threading. > On Friday, May 27, 2011 2:40:57 AM UTC-4, Juha Nieminen wrote: >> In general try/catch blocks do not make the code any slower, so an >> efficiency argument is unjustified. > > Try/catch blocks significantly impede optimizations on some compilers. So they effectively make code slower. Care to cite an example where this is true? -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: need argument for try catch blocks Alexei Zakharov <alexeiz@gmail.com> - 2011-06-08 08:37 -0700
Re: need argument for try catch blocks Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-09 07:47 +1200
Re: need argument for try catch blocks "Martin B." <0xCDCDCDCD@gmx.at> - 2011-06-09 14:05 +0200
csiph-web