Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121600
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness |
| Date | Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:05:25 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 50 |
| Message-ID | <87tt8yn4qy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <eomnqj9h74qlbaaeh3llfj2cskptgssg2l@4ax.com> <877c5wnixf.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <ne6qqjtnq6r3kcrb7c4k3jjccoce4759bu@4ax.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:05:26 +0100 (CET) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="a242221703c60c2edaebd28191060ef6"; logging-data="2677688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18zO+hwXVZ6DZLJZHn7+BaJ" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:uAuFrVuZ/OS1JnLAKDWQzrG9MY0= sha1:OzM5whsjMg4jZlJOdfRQiHqXqAQ= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c++:121600 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:46:52 -0800, Keith Thompson
> <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> writes:
>>> I hope to achieve neos Turing Completeness in March during a two week
>>> holiday.
>>>
>>> Also, did you know that with neos you can mix code from different
>>> programming languages in the same source code file!
>>
>>That's a remarkable assertion.
>>
>>I presume you're asserting that you can do this *and* the code will
>>execute correctly.
>
> Of course.
>
>>
>>Are you saying that that's possible in your current implementation, or
>>that it's something you intend to implement in the future?
>
> It will be possible in 1.0.
>
>>
>>Does switching from one language to another require some kind of
>>explicit marker, or does neos figure it out? With what granularity?
>
> In 1.0 a marker will be used.
>
>>
>>If the latter, how does it know whether
>>
>> size_t s = sizeof 'a';
>>
>>is C (typically setting s to 4, sizeof (int)) or C++ (setting s to 1)?
I just replied to your followup elsewhere in this thread, where you
indicated that no markers would be needed.
Are you saying that the marker will be unnecessary in later versions?
(If not, why not just say "A marker will be used" without reference to a
release number.)
My questions stand for later releases.
Again, I suggest that speculation from others is not helpful.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-11 23:22 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 15:46 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-12 08:12 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-12 10:53 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-12 10:06 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-12 11:34 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-12 10:55 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 02:47 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-12 11:36 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-12 16:51 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-12 21:58 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 15:00 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-12 12:26 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-13 00:00 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-13 06:46 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 13:58 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-12 22:00 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 15:05 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-13 17:34 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-14 09:48 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-14 13:25 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-15 10:15 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 14:37 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-15 15:50 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 15:53 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-15 16:33 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 16:35 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-15 17:00 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-15 17:47 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 16:52 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-15 17:02 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 17:04 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 14:44 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 22:59 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-16 09:23 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-16 14:13 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-16 13:18 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-16 17:01 +0200
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-16 16:17 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-16 16:44 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-16 16:09 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-16 16:47 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-17 08:11 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-16 16:41 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 15:23 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-17 09:02 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-16 11:30 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-15 23:49 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-15 11:54 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 17:00 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-15 12:20 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 17:24 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-16 09:19 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-15 17:04 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-15 17:16 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-16 14:31 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-16 16:44 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-14 13:40 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-02-14 21:23 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-15 10:09 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-02-16 05:47 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-02-14 15:14 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler (neos) - Turing Completeness Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-14 16:00 +0000
csiph-web