Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #85669

Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"?

Show all headers | View raw

Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> writes:
> In another forum I was discussing string literals and char arrays.
> During the conversation this question occurred to me:
> In an array initialization like this:
>
>     char str[] = "hello";
>
> can that "hello" even be considered a "string literal", or should it
> be classified as something else?

It's a string literal.

A string literal is a syntactic construct, a sequence of characters
in a source file.  "hello" unquestionably meets the definition of
*string-literal* given in the C++ grammar.

A char array is an object that can exist during program execution.

> The question arose because an (actual) string literal has a type of
> array-of-const-char (of a size needed to store the contents of the
> string literal). So for example the type of "hello" is const char[6].

Yes.

> However, you can't initialize an array with another array. Given that
> fact, that would mean that the "hello" in
>
>     char str[] = "hello";
>
> is not a const char[6] (because you can't initialize 'str' with one).

There's a specific rule that allows a char array to be initialized with
a string literal.  See [dcl.init.string] in the standard.

The string literal "hello" is always of type `const char[6]`.
In most contexts, it "decays" to a pointer expression of type `const
char*` which evaluates to the address of the initial character
of the array.  A string literal used as an initializer for a
character array object is one of the exceptions, where it does not
"decay".  The array value is used to initialize the array object.
(Another exception is the operand of `sizeof`.)

> It's something else. In fact, the above is essentially just syntactic
> sugar for:
>
>     char str[] = { 'h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o', '\0' };
>
> Thus, should that "hello", in this context, be considered an initializer
> list rather than a "string literal"?

No, it's a string literal.  The fact that it happens to be equivalent to
some other syntactic construct does not change that fact.

> (Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if the standard still calls it a "string
> literal". But even standards are flawed and ambiguous sometimes. No
> standard is absolutely perfect.)

Yes, standards are flawed and ambiguous, but this is not a flaw or an
ambiguity.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-26 07:57 +0000
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-07-26 08:03 +0000
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-07-26 01:51 -0700
    Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-26 10:07 +0000
      Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-07-26 05:10 -0700
        Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-07-26 06:18 -0700
        Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-26 16:03 +0000
          Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 18:18 +0200
            Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-27 07:40 +0000
              Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-07-27 01:17 -0700
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2022-07-26 11:11 +0200
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 02:30 -0700
    Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-26 10:19 +0000
    Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 12:03 -0700
      Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 01:56 -0700
        Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 11:02 -0700
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 11:36 +0200
    Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-07-26 10:22 +0000
      Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 16:50 +0200
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 12:13 -0700
  Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-07-26 17:56 -0700
    Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-26 19:24 -0700
      Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-07-27 13:05 -0700
        Re: Is a char array initializer a "string literal"? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-07-27 15:38 -0700

csiph-web