Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #71086
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? |
| Date | Fri, 03 Jan 2020 23:56:49 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <87k167odry.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <qup223$eje$1@dont-email.me> <qup3ng$krp$1@dont-email.me> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ae6c07825fe602dea7ed53b20475ec70"; logging-data="5503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+P2TirFS69+my9X41tFNRE" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Al9AVwA5xNMp7CLM+iO/86aGnLQ= sha1:VXACkTC3MVv/mIYpWsuJoJ7e4E0= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c++:71086 |
Show key headers only | View raw
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
[...]
> The actual requirements are in terms of the required range of values
> that each standard integer type must be able to represent, and are
> incorporated by reference from the C standard. I've converted those
> ranges into bit counts to better match your question.
A quibble: the required ranges of values for the standard integer types
are copied from the C standard, but are not incorporated by reference.
> One a 64-bit machine, long is often a 64-bit type, with int being a 32
> bit type.
True, but Microsoft's compiler has 32-bit long even on 64-bit machines.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
[Note updated email address]
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? wolfgang bauer <schutz@gmx.de> - 2020-01-04 04:50 +0100
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-03 23:18 -0500
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? wolfgang bauer <schutz@gmx.de> - 2020-01-04 05:36 +0100
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2020-01-04 00:19 -0600
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2020-01-03 22:29 -0800
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-01-03 23:56 -0800
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-04 09:48 -0500
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-01-04 14:48 -0800
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-04 21:39 -0500
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-01-04 19:43 -0800
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2020-01-05 06:09 +0100
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2020-01-05 20:50 -0500
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-01-04 08:37 +0000
Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-01-04 02:16 -0800
Thank you. (was:Re: uint32_t is not the same as long unsigned int ?) wolfgang bauer <schutz@gmx.de> - 2020-01-04 15:15 +0100
csiph-web